Network meta-analysis of first-line systemic regimens for older patients with advanced NSCLC.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anti-Cancer Drugs Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000001602
Andrea Luciani, Lorenzo Dottorini, Elena Battaiotto, Fausto Petrelli
{"title":"Network meta-analysis of first-line systemic regimens for older patients with advanced NSCLC.","authors":"Andrea Luciani, Lorenzo Dottorini, Elena Battaiotto, Fausto Petrelli","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various immunotherapy treatments have received approval for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as standalone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, contingent upon the extent of PD-L1 expression. These treatments are commonly utilized in clinical practice. However, a specific gap exists in direct comparisons of these regimens in elderly patients. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to examine the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, either alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, as the initial treatment for elderly patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC. We extensively searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to gather randomized clinical trials that utilized PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC. By means of Bayesian NMA, we conducted an analysis on hazard ratios (HRs) related to overall survival (OS). A total of 5240 patients were included in the 21 trials. Across all studies, cemiplimab exhibited a noteworthy superiority to chemotherapy in terms of OS [HR = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-0.77]. In the subgroup analysis, it was observed that patients with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher experienced the greatest OS benefit from cemiplimab (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.3-0.77). Conversely, the cohort with unselected PD-L1 scores (>1 or any score) exhibited the greatest OS benefit when treated with pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, as indicated by a HR of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.9). Chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab and cemiplimab monotherapy may represent the reference regimens for older patients with NSCLC with unselected and >50% PD-L1 expression, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"576-583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various immunotherapy treatments have received approval for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), either as standalone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, contingent upon the extent of PD-L1 expression. These treatments are commonly utilized in clinical practice. However, a specific gap exists in direct comparisons of these regimens in elderly patients. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to examine the effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, either alone or in conjunction with chemotherapy, as the initial treatment for elderly patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC. We extensively searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to gather randomized clinical trials that utilized PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC. By means of Bayesian NMA, we conducted an analysis on hazard ratios (HRs) related to overall survival (OS). A total of 5240 patients were included in the 21 trials. Across all studies, cemiplimab exhibited a noteworthy superiority to chemotherapy in terms of OS [HR = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.3-0.77]. In the subgroup analysis, it was observed that patients with PD-L1 expression of 50% or higher experienced the greatest OS benefit from cemiplimab (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.3-0.77). Conversely, the cohort with unselected PD-L1 scores (>1 or any score) exhibited the greatest OS benefit when treated with pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy, as indicated by a HR of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.9). Chemotherapy combined with pembrolizumab and cemiplimab monotherapy may represent the reference regimens for older patients with NSCLC with unselected and >50% PD-L1 expression, respectively.

老年晚期 NSCLC 患者一线系统治疗方案的网络荟萃分析。
各种免疫疗法已被批准用于治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),可根据 PD-L1 的表达程度单独使用或与化疗联合使用。这些疗法在临床实践中得到了普遍应用。然而,在老年患者中对这些治疗方案进行直接比较却存在特定的空白。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在研究 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂单独或与化疗联合使用,作为确诊为晚期 NSCLC 的老年患者的初始治疗方案的有效性。我们广泛检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆,收集了使用 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂作为晚期 NSCLC 一线疗法的随机临床试验。通过贝叶斯近似模型,我们对与总生存期(OS)相关的危险比(HRs)进行了分析。21 项试验共纳入了 5240 例患者。在所有研究中,就OS而言,cemiplimab明显优于化疗[HR = 0.48,95%置信区间(CI):0.3-0.77]。在亚组分析中观察到,PD-L1表达达到或超过50%的患者从塞米普利单抗中获得的OS获益最大(HR = 0.48,95% CI:0.3-0.77)。相反,未选择PD-L1评分(>1或任何评分)的组群在接受pembrolizumab联合化疗治疗时的OS获益最大,HR为0.69(95% CI:0.52-0.9)。化疗联合pembrolizumab和cemiplimab单药治疗可能分别代表了未选择和PD-L1表达>50%的老年NSCLC患者的参考方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信