Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6200915
Dina Mahmoud Fakhry, Hatem ElMoutaz Mahmoud, Dina Yehia Kassim, Hebatallah NegmEldeen AbdElAzeem
{"title":"Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study.","authors":"Dina Mahmoud Fakhry, Hatem ElMoutaz Mahmoud, Dina Yehia Kassim, Hebatallah NegmEldeen AbdElAzeem","doi":"10.1155/2024/6200915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the attention paid to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and postoperative analgesia has increased.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the current study was to compare the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) upon providing relief to patients with postoperative pain who underwent laparoscopic resection for CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, comparative, and randomized study, the authors considered a total of 60 patients who chose to undergo laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. The total number of patients was randomly divided into two groups (such as ESPB and TQLB) so that each group had a total of 30 patients. For the former group, i.e., the ESPB group, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered at each side for bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block, while the latter group received the same dose of medicine for bilateral ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB). The researchers recorded the first time to rescue an analgesic, the whole amount of rescue analgesia under consumption in the first 24 hours after the surgical procedure, and associated adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the groups considered, the ESPB group took a significantly lengthy time to raise a first request for rescue analgesic (280 ± 15.5 min) in comparison with the TQLB group (260 ± 13.8 min). Likewise, the consumption of overall nalbuphine was remarkably lesser in the ESPB group during the first 24 hours (24 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the TQLB group (30.5 ± 1.55 mg).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analgesic efficacy of ESPB was better when compared to TQLB in terms of time to rescue analgesia and overall opioid consumption during the first 24 hours. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 10/10/2022 (registration number: NCT05574283).</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6200915"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10963107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6200915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, the attention paid to colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and postoperative analgesia has increased.

Objective: The objective of the current study was to compare the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) upon providing relief to patients with postoperative pain who underwent laparoscopic resection for CRC.

Methods: In this prospective, comparative, and randomized study, the authors considered a total of 60 patients who chose to undergo laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. The total number of patients was randomly divided into two groups (such as ESPB and TQLB) so that each group had a total of 30 patients. For the former group, i.e., the ESPB group, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered at each side for bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block, while the latter group received the same dose of medicine for bilateral ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB). The researchers recorded the first time to rescue an analgesic, the whole amount of rescue analgesia under consumption in the first 24 hours after the surgical procedure, and associated adverse events.

Results: Among the groups considered, the ESPB group took a significantly lengthy time to raise a first request for rescue analgesic (280 ± 15.5 min) in comparison with the TQLB group (260 ± 13.8 min). Likewise, the consumption of overall nalbuphine was remarkably lesser in the ESPB group during the first 24 hours (24 ± 2.5 mg) compared to the TQLB group (30.5 ± 1.55 mg).

Conclusion: The analgesic efficacy of ESPB was better when compared to TQLB in terms of time to rescue analgesia and overall opioid consumption during the first 24 hours. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 10/10/2022 (registration number: NCT05574283).

腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术后镇痛的脊肌平面阻滞与腰四肌阻滞:前瞻性随机研究
背景:近年来,人们对结直肠癌(CRC)手术和术后镇痛的关注与日俱增:本研究旨在比较超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)和经肌四腰肌阻滞(TQLB)对缓解腹腔镜下 CRC 术后疼痛患者的影响:在这项前瞻性、对比性和随机研究中,作者共考虑了 60 名选择接受腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的患者。研究人员将所有患者随机分为两组(ESPB 和 TQLB),每组各 30 名患者。前一组,即 ESPB 组,每侧注射 20 毫升 0.25% 布比卡因,进行超声引导下的双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞,而后一组则接受相同剂量的药物,进行超声引导下的双侧经肌四腰肌阻滞(TQLB)。研究人员记录了首次抢救镇痛剂的时间、手术后 24 小时内抢救镇痛剂的总用量以及相关不良事件:结果:在所有研究组中,ESPB组首次请求镇痛的时间(280±15.5分钟)明显长于TQLB组(260±13.8分钟)。同样,与TQLB组(30.5±1.55毫克)相比,ESPB组在最初24小时内的纳布啡总用量明显较少(24±2.5毫克):结论:与TQLB相比,ESPB在前24小时内的镇痛疗效更好,在镇痛时间和阿片类药物的总用量方面也更胜一筹。本研究于 2022 年 10 月 10 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册(注册号:NCT05574283)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信