Law enforcement and auditors' roles, responses, and complicated relationships in accounting fraud?

Darti Djuharni, Nursaid Nursaid, Sonhaji Sonhaji
{"title":"Law enforcement and auditors' roles, responses, and complicated relationships in accounting fraud?","authors":"Darti Djuharni, Nursaid Nursaid, Sonhaji Sonhaji","doi":"10.61650/rjme.v1i2.469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial statement falsification or fraud that directly affects financial statements. The most extreme financial statement manipulation is accounting fraud. Beyond financial losses, fraud affects employees, industry, the environment, and society (International Public Sector Fraud Forum, 2020). Fraud causes corporate bankruptcy, reducing family income. Fraud distorts markets by giving fraudulent companies an advantage over legal ones. Accounting fraud can cause controversies that impact society and stakeholders. Regulators, practitioners, and researchers prioritize preventing these potentially dangerous events. Corporate activity monitoring has improved, but severe accounting fraud remains in ostensibly robust and diverse institutional environments. Accounting literature on auditor-law enforcement fraud coordination is examined in this study. This literature review uses a mixed methods research synthesis to analyze accounting journal articles from 2014 to 2024 using keywords like \"Auditors,\" \"Enforcement,\" \"Accounting fraud,\" \"responses,\" and \"complicated relationships.\" Auditor and law enforcement roles, leading fraud indicators, and stages will be studied. Use Publish or Perish (PoP) and SLR 7P to collect data from SINTA, SEMANTIC Scholar, and Google Scholar. The investigations show the range of fraud terminologies and concepts, quantitative measurement discrepancy, and shallow fraud analysis. This study suggests more law enforcement-auditor case studies. This work will inform fraud accounting research. This paper underlines the need for academic, political, and practitioner cooperation to limit fraud's economic and social harms in a complex and interrelated system. This study examines how the accounting literature addresses law enforcement-auditor relationships in accounting fraud rather than monitoring systems or broad fraud discussions. Law enforcement actions have a significant impact on auditor-client relationships and information disclosure. Customers' perceptions of auditor quality and risks will be examined in the essay.","PeriodicalId":517673,"journal":{"name":"Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61650/rjme.v1i2.469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Financial statement falsification or fraud that directly affects financial statements. The most extreme financial statement manipulation is accounting fraud. Beyond financial losses, fraud affects employees, industry, the environment, and society (International Public Sector Fraud Forum, 2020). Fraud causes corporate bankruptcy, reducing family income. Fraud distorts markets by giving fraudulent companies an advantage over legal ones. Accounting fraud can cause controversies that impact society and stakeholders. Regulators, practitioners, and researchers prioritize preventing these potentially dangerous events. Corporate activity monitoring has improved, but severe accounting fraud remains in ostensibly robust and diverse institutional environments. Accounting literature on auditor-law enforcement fraud coordination is examined in this study. This literature review uses a mixed methods research synthesis to analyze accounting journal articles from 2014 to 2024 using keywords like "Auditors," "Enforcement," "Accounting fraud," "responses," and "complicated relationships." Auditor and law enforcement roles, leading fraud indicators, and stages will be studied. Use Publish or Perish (PoP) and SLR 7P to collect data from SINTA, SEMANTIC Scholar, and Google Scholar. The investigations show the range of fraud terminologies and concepts, quantitative measurement discrepancy, and shallow fraud analysis. This study suggests more law enforcement-auditor case studies. This work will inform fraud accounting research. This paper underlines the need for academic, political, and practitioner cooperation to limit fraud's economic and social harms in a complex and interrelated system. This study examines how the accounting literature addresses law enforcement-auditor relationships in accounting fraud rather than monitoring systems or broad fraud discussions. Law enforcement actions have a significant impact on auditor-client relationships and information disclosure. Customers' perceptions of auditor quality and risks will be examined in the essay.
执法部门和审计人员在会计欺诈中的角色、应对措施和复杂关系?
财务报表造假或直接影响财务报表的欺诈行为。最极端的财务报表操纵就是会计欺诈。除财务损失外,欺诈还会影响员工、行业、环境和社会(国际公共部门欺诈论坛,2020 年)。欺诈导致企业破产,减少家庭收入。欺诈使欺诈公司比合法公司更具优势,从而扭曲了市场。会计欺诈会引起争议,影响社会和利益相关者。监管机构、从业人员和研究人员都将预防这些潜在的危险事件放在首位。对公司活动的监督已有所改善,但在表面上健全和多样化的制度环境中,严重的会计欺诈仍然存在。本研究审查了有关审计师-执法人员欺诈协调的会计文献。本文献综述采用混合研究综合法,使用 "审计师"、"执法"、"会计欺诈"、"应对措施 "和 "复杂关系 "等关键词,对 2014 年至 2024 年的会计期刊论文进行分析。将研究审计师和执法部门的作用、主要欺诈指标和阶段。使用 "出版或毁灭"(PoP)和 SLR 7P 从 SINTA、SEMANTIC Scholar 和 Google Scholar 收集数据。调查显示了欺诈术语和概念的范围、定量测量的差异以及浅层次的欺诈分析。本研究建议开展更多执法-审计人员案例研究。这项工作将为欺诈会计研究提供参考。本文强调了学术界、政界和从业人员合作的必要性,以限制欺诈在复杂而相互关联的系统中造成的经济和社会危害。本研究探讨了会计文献如何处理会计欺诈中的执法与审计关系,而非监督系统或广泛的欺诈讨论。执法行动对审计师-客户关系和信息披露有重大影响。文中还将探讨客户对审计师质量和风险的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信