Efficiency at Heart: Navigating the Hybrid Single-Ventricle Pathway

{"title":"Efficiency at Heart: Navigating the Hybrid Single-Ventricle Pathway","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.02.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Single-ventricle cardiac defects (SVCDs) are among of the most health care resource–intensive congenital diseases. Although SVCDs are traditionally palliated using the Norwood pathway, in the last 2 decades select programs have used the hybrid strategy, which redistributes the operative and interstage risks. This study sought to characterize resource use for a cohort of patients with hybrid-palliated SVCD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients with SVCDs who underwent palliation with the hybrid strategy and who were followed up exclusively at our institution from January 2008 to December 2021 were included. End points were death, Norwood conversion, orthotopic heart transplantation, 6 months post-Fontan status, or 4 years of age in those patients who had not completed staged palliation. Primary end points included total days hospitalized, number of cardiology visits, echocardiograms, catheterizations, and advanced imaging performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 135 patients with a diagnosis of SVCD, 72 survived for 6 months after the Fontan procedure. By patient-year for the entirety of the pathway, patients had a median hospital length of stay of 16 days (interquartile range [IQR], 12-25 days), 7 cardiology visits (IQR, 6-9), 8 echocardiograms (IQR, 7-10), and 0.7 catheterizations (IQR, 0.4-1.1). The interstage 1 period had the heaviest resource burden requiring intense cardiology follow-up and echocardiography surveillance. Cardiac catheterizations and advanced imaging were most prevalent during interstage 2 period, with a median of 2 (IQR, 1-2) catheterizations and 36 (40%) patients undergoing advanced imaging. The total median number of hospital days per patient was 63 days (IQR, 47-98.5 days).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Resource use for the care of patients with SVCDs is significant. The intensity of surveillance decreases as patients progress through the pathway. In comparison with published Norwood pathway data, resource intensity and use patterns in hybrid palliation are comparable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001207/pdfft?md5=db6251d56d2acf091e6fb6b0c45ce16f&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001207-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Single-ventricle cardiac defects (SVCDs) are among of the most health care resource–intensive congenital diseases. Although SVCDs are traditionally palliated using the Norwood pathway, in the last 2 decades select programs have used the hybrid strategy, which redistributes the operative and interstage risks. This study sought to characterize resource use for a cohort of patients with hybrid-palliated SVCD.

Methods

All patients with SVCDs who underwent palliation with the hybrid strategy and who were followed up exclusively at our institution from January 2008 to December 2021 were included. End points were death, Norwood conversion, orthotopic heart transplantation, 6 months post-Fontan status, or 4 years of age in those patients who had not completed staged palliation. Primary end points included total days hospitalized, number of cardiology visits, echocardiograms, catheterizations, and advanced imaging performed.

Results

Of 135 patients with a diagnosis of SVCD, 72 survived for 6 months after the Fontan procedure. By patient-year for the entirety of the pathway, patients had a median hospital length of stay of 16 days (interquartile range [IQR], 12-25 days), 7 cardiology visits (IQR, 6-9), 8 echocardiograms (IQR, 7-10), and 0.7 catheterizations (IQR, 0.4-1.1). The interstage 1 period had the heaviest resource burden requiring intense cardiology follow-up and echocardiography surveillance. Cardiac catheterizations and advanced imaging were most prevalent during interstage 2 period, with a median of 2 (IQR, 1-2) catheterizations and 36 (40%) patients undergoing advanced imaging. The total median number of hospital days per patient was 63 days (IQR, 47-98.5 days).

Conclusions

Resource use for the care of patients with SVCDs is significant. The intensity of surveillance decreases as patients progress through the pathway. In comparison with published Norwood pathway data, resource intensity and use patterns in hybrid palliation are comparable.

高效心脏:单心室混合路径导航
背景单心室心脏缺损(SVCD)是最耗费医疗资源的先天性疾病之一。虽然单心室心脏缺损传统上采用诺伍德路径进行姑息治疗,但在过去的二十年中,一些项目采用了混合策略,重新分配了手术风险和阶段间风险。本研究试图描述混合姑息治疗 SVCD 患者队列的资源使用情况。方法纳入所有接受混合策略姑息治疗的 SVCD 患者,这些患者于 2008 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院接受了独家随访。终点为死亡、诺伍德转归、正位心脏移植、方丹术后6个月或未完成分期姑息治疗的患者年满4岁。主要终点包括住院总天数、心脏科就诊次数、超声心动图检查次数、导管检查次数和高级成像检查次数。在整个治疗过程中,按患者年计算,患者的中位住院时间为16天(四分位数间距[IQR]为12-25天),接受了7次心脏科检查(IQR为6-9次)、8次超声心动图检查(IQR为7-10次)和0.7次导管检查(IQR为0.4-1.1次)。第一阶段间期的资源负担最重,需要密集的心脏病学随访和超声心动图监测。心导管检查和高级成像在第 2 阶段间期最为普遍,中位数为 2 次(IQR,1-2),36(40%)名患者接受了高级成像检查。每位患者住院总天数的中位数为 63 天(IQR,47-98.5 天)。随着患者病情的进展,监护强度也在降低。与已公布的诺伍德路径数据相比,混合姑息治疗的资源强度和使用模式具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信