Detection of predefined bacterial species in the Vaginal Microbiota in SARS-COV-2-Positive Patients

M. Kovachev, M. Kunchev, S. Kovachev
{"title":"Detection of predefined bacterial species in the Vaginal Microbiota in SARS-COV-2-Positive Patients","authors":"M. Kovachev, M. Kunchev, S. Kovachev","doi":"10.2478/amb-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be found in the vagina of infected women remains unclear; moreover, the impact of the virus on the normal vaginal microbiota is not known.\n \n \n of our study was to identify the vaginal presence of SARS-CoV-2 and detection of predefined bacterial species changes in the vaginal flora of women that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection.\n \n \n \n This prospective study included 40 women, aged 24-47 years, tested for SARS-CoV-2 via nasopharyngeal and vaginal culture (TaqPath ™COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR), and vaginally tested for changes in the vaginal microbiota using the Femoflor® 16 REAL-TIME PCR Detection Kit.\n \n \n \n No one of women in this study was tested positive for vaginal presence of SARS-CoV-2. Three (7.5%) women with sexually transmitted disease were excluded. Irregularities were observed in the vaginal microbiota of 8 (21.6%) out of 37 patients included in the study: 3 (8.1%) from the SARS-CoV-2-positive group and 5 (13.5%) from the SARS-CoV-2-negative group. The remaining 29 (78.4%) women had normal vaginal flora; lactobacilli were found to be dominant. Although results revealed a difference in the vaginal microbiota between the two groups, the differences were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05).\n \n \n \n Even though it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 invades the vagina of infected women, there is no significant evidence to suggest that it causes a more frequent disturbance in the vaginal microbiota of infected women compared to that in healthy women.\n","PeriodicalId":503338,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","volume":"25 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/amb-2024-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be found in the vagina of infected women remains unclear; moreover, the impact of the virus on the normal vaginal microbiota is not known. of our study was to identify the vaginal presence of SARS-CoV-2 and detection of predefined bacterial species changes in the vaginal flora of women that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This prospective study included 40 women, aged 24-47 years, tested for SARS-CoV-2 via nasopharyngeal and vaginal culture (TaqPath ™COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR), and vaginally tested for changes in the vaginal microbiota using the Femoflor® 16 REAL-TIME PCR Detection Kit. No one of women in this study was tested positive for vaginal presence of SARS-CoV-2. Three (7.5%) women with sexually transmitted disease were excluded. Irregularities were observed in the vaginal microbiota of 8 (21.6%) out of 37 patients included in the study: 3 (8.1%) from the SARS-CoV-2-positive group and 5 (13.5%) from the SARS-CoV-2-negative group. The remaining 29 (78.4%) women had normal vaginal flora; lactobacilli were found to be dominant. Although results revealed a difference in the vaginal microbiota between the two groups, the differences were not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05). Even though it remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 invades the vagina of infected women, there is no significant evidence to suggest that it causes a more frequent disturbance in the vaginal microbiota of infected women compared to that in healthy women.
检测 SARS-COV-2 阳性患者阴道微生物群中的预定细菌种类
严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)是否会出现在受感染妇女的阴道中仍不清楚;此外,病毒对正常阴道微生物群的影响也不清楚。 我们的研究旨在确定阴道中是否存在 SARS-CoV-2 并检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染阳性妇女阴道菌群中预定义细菌种类的变化。 这项前瞻性研究包括 40 名年龄在 24-47 岁之间的妇女,她们通过鼻咽和阴道培养(TaqPath ™COVID-19 CE-IVD RT-PCR)检测是否感染了 SARS-CoV-2,并使用 Femoflor® 16 REAL-TIME PCR 检测试剂盒检测阴道微生物群的变化。 在这项研究中,没有一名妇女的阴道 SARS-CoV-2 检测结果呈阳性。3名(7.5%)患有性传播疾病的妇女被排除在外。在 37 名患者中,有 8 人(21.6%)的阴道微生物群出现异常:其中 3 人(8.1%)来自 SARS-CoV-2 阳性组,5 人(13.5%)来自 SARS-CoV-2 阴性组。其余 29 名(78.4%)妇女的阴道菌群正常,其中以乳酸杆菌为主。尽管结果显示两组妇女的阴道微生物群存在差异,但差异不具有统计学意义(P ≥ 0.05)。 尽管目前还不清楚 SARS-CoV-2 是否会入侵受感染妇女的阴道,但没有明显证据表明,与健康妇女相比,SARS-CoV-2 会更频繁地扰乱受感染妇女的阴道微生物群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信