Management of sporadic intracranial vascular malformations in pregnancy: a retrospective analysis

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
S.J. Ellwood, A.A. Mootz, J.M. Carabuena, M.K. Farber, S.C. Reale
{"title":"Management of sporadic intracranial vascular malformations in pregnancy: a retrospective analysis","authors":"S.J. Ellwood,&nbsp;A.A. Mootz,&nbsp;J.M. Carabuena,&nbsp;M.K. Farber,&nbsp;S.C. Reale","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.103989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sporadic intracranial vascular malformations can pose significant risk to parturients, and additional reports of management may inform patient care. Here we describe the peripartum management of parturients with intracranial vascular malformations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>After Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective analysis of parturients with a known sporadic intracranial vascular malformation including cavernous malformation, developmental venous anomaly, or arteriovenous malformation who delivered at our institution between 2007 and 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 10 parturients (five cavernous malformations, three developmental venous anomalies, and two arteriovenous malformations) with 16 deliveries. Among all deliveries, 13 (81.3%) were cesarean deliveries without trial of labor; 11 of these (84.6%) received a single-shot spinal and two (15.4%) received an epidural for surgical anesthesia. Two deliveries (12.5%) began with attempted trial of labor but ultimately required cesarean delivery for failure to progress; one of these cases received epidural anesthesia and the other received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. One delivery was via spontaneous vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia. Overall, our study’s cesarean delivery rate was 93.8% and spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was 6.2%.</p><p>Three of 16 pregnancies were complicated by seizure, obstructive hydrocephalus, or intracranial hemorrhage. There were no intensive care unit admissions or maternal deaths.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our case series of 16 deliveries, there were no complications directly resulting from neuraxial procedures. It remains unclear whether intracranial developmental venous anomalies or unruptured arteriovenous malformations impart increased risk during pregnancy. Antepartum planning with a multidisciplinary team approach enables risk stratification and optimal management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24000244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sporadic intracranial vascular malformations can pose significant risk to parturients, and additional reports of management may inform patient care. Here we describe the peripartum management of parturients with intracranial vascular malformations.

Methods

After Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective analysis of parturients with a known sporadic intracranial vascular malformation including cavernous malformation, developmental venous anomaly, or arteriovenous malformation who delivered at our institution between 2007 and 2020.

Results

We identified 10 parturients (five cavernous malformations, three developmental venous anomalies, and two arteriovenous malformations) with 16 deliveries. Among all deliveries, 13 (81.3%) were cesarean deliveries without trial of labor; 11 of these (84.6%) received a single-shot spinal and two (15.4%) received an epidural for surgical anesthesia. Two deliveries (12.5%) began with attempted trial of labor but ultimately required cesarean delivery for failure to progress; one of these cases received epidural anesthesia and the other received combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. One delivery was via spontaneous vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia. Overall, our study’s cesarean delivery rate was 93.8% and spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was 6.2%.

Three of 16 pregnancies were complicated by seizure, obstructive hydrocephalus, or intracranial hemorrhage. There were no intensive care unit admissions or maternal deaths.

Conclusions

In our case series of 16 deliveries, there were no complications directly resulting from neuraxial procedures. It remains unclear whether intracranial developmental venous anomalies or unruptured arteriovenous malformations impart increased risk during pregnancy. Antepartum planning with a multidisciplinary team approach enables risk stratification and optimal management.

妊娠期散发性颅内血管畸形的处理:回顾性分析
背景散发性颅内血管畸形会给产妇带来巨大风险,更多的管理报告可为患者护理提供参考。方法经机构审查委员会批准后,我们对 2007 年至 2020 年期间在本机构分娩的已知散发性颅内血管畸形(包括海绵状畸形、发育性静脉异常或动静脉畸形)的产妇进行了回顾性分析。结果 我们确定了 10 名产妇(5 名海绵畸形、3 名发育静脉畸形和 2 名动静脉畸形),共分娩 16 次。在所有分娩中,13 例(81.3%)是未经试产的剖宫产;其中 11 例(84.6%)接受了单针脊髓麻醉,2 例(15.4%)接受了硬膜外手术麻醉。有两例分娩(12.5%)开始时尝试试产,但最终因没有进展而需要剖宫产;其中一例接受了硬膜外麻醉,另一例接受了脊柱-硬膜外联合麻醉。其中一例是在硬膜外镇痛的情况下经阴道自然分娩。总体而言,本研究的剖宫产率为 93.8%,自然阴道分娩率为 6.2%。16 例孕妇中有 3 例因癫痫发作、梗阻性脑积水或颅内出血而并发症。结论 在我们的 16 例分娩系列病例中,没有因神经经颅手术直接导致的并发症。颅内发育性静脉畸形或未破裂的动静脉畸形是否会增加孕期风险,目前仍不清楚。通过多学科团队的产前规划,可以进行风险分层和优化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信