Open Education and Alternative Digital Credentials in Europe

Dai Griffiths, Daniel Burgos, Stefania Aceto
{"title":"Open Education and Alternative Digital Credentials in Europe","authors":"Dai Griffiths, Daniel Burgos, Stefania Aceto","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learners who learn from OER often cannot have their learning assessed or receive a credential. Open credentials offer a potential solution to this problem, combining badges or micro-credentials with competence frameworks and digital seals. This study identified the current situation of open credentials in post-secondary education in Europe, the main themes of the discourse, and the points of agreement and divergence surrounding them. The data comprised a corpus of transcriptions from 12 expert interviews and a focus group. Qualitative text analysis identified the principal themes. Findings included the following: (a) few assessments are available as open content; (b) linking OER and credentials requires detailed and expensive work on learning outcomes and assessment; (c) the aggregation of open credentials to create higher-level qualifications is a widely accepted ambition; (d) the European Union’s infrastructure to support open credentials is appropriate and effective and can foster trust; (e) the outstanding challenges are organisational and practical, not technological; (f) assessment and content provisions should belong to separate organisational functions; and finally, (g) funding and support for open credentials in professional accreditation are essential for further progress.","PeriodicalId":22544,"journal":{"name":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learners who learn from OER often cannot have their learning assessed or receive a credential. Open credentials offer a potential solution to this problem, combining badges or micro-credentials with competence frameworks and digital seals. This study identified the current situation of open credentials in post-secondary education in Europe, the main themes of the discourse, and the points of agreement and divergence surrounding them. The data comprised a corpus of transcriptions from 12 expert interviews and a focus group. Qualitative text analysis identified the principal themes. Findings included the following: (a) few assessments are available as open content; (b) linking OER and credentials requires detailed and expensive work on learning outcomes and assessment; (c) the aggregation of open credentials to create higher-level qualifications is a widely accepted ambition; (d) the European Union’s infrastructure to support open credentials is appropriate and effective and can foster trust; (e) the outstanding challenges are organisational and practical, not technological; (f) assessment and content provisions should belong to separate organisational functions; and finally, (g) funding and support for open credentials in professional accreditation are essential for further progress.
欧洲的开放教育和替代性数字证书
从开放式教育资源中学习的学员往往无法对其学习进行评估或获得证书。开放式证书是解决这一问题的潜在办法,它将徽章或微型证书与能力框架和数字印章结合在一起。本研究确定了欧洲中学后教育中开放式证书的现状、讨论的主要议题以及围绕这些议题的共识和分歧点。数据包括 12 个专家访谈和一个焦点小组的文字记录。定性文本分析确定了主要的主题。研究结果如下(a) 作为开放内容提供的评估很少;(b) 将开放式教育资源和证书联系起来需要在学习成果和评估方面开展细致而昂贵的工作;(c) 整合开放式证书以创建更高级别的资格证书是一个被广泛接受的目标;(d) 欧盟支持开放式证书的基础设施是适当而有效的,可以促进信任;(e) 悬而未决的挑战是组织和实践方面的,而不是技术方面的;(f) 评估和内容规定 应属于不同的组织职能;最后,(g) 为专业认证中的开放式证书提供资金和支持对取得进 一步进展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信