Clinical Implications of a Formulary Conversion From Budesonide/formoterol to Fluticasone/salmeterol at a VA Medical Center

Lindsay Hoke
{"title":"Clinical Implications of a Formulary Conversion From Budesonide/formoterol to Fluticasone/salmeterol at a VA Medical Center","authors":"Lindsay Hoke","doi":"10.12788/fp.0459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disorder associated with chronic and slowly progressive systemic inflammation. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommends a combination inhaler of a long-acting β -2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid for patients with a history of frequent exacerbations. In 2021, the US Department of Veterans Affairs transitioned patients who were prescribed budesonide/formoterol inhaler to a fluticasone/ salmeterol inhaler. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes including COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations 6 months before vs 6 months after the inhaler transition. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, treatment failure, tobacco use, and antimicrobial/systemic corticosteroid use. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a prescription for a budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol inhalers between February 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022, at the Hershel “Woody” Williams Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Huntington, West Virginia. Results: In a convenience sample of 100 patients who transitioned from the budesonide/formoterol inhaler to the fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler, exacerbations increased from 24 before the transition to 29 after the transition, which was not a statistically significant change ( P = .56). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary endpoints including active tobacco use. Three patients had adverse reactions to fluticasone/ salmeterol, while 18 patients experienced a therapeutic failure to fluticasone/salmeterol. Conclusions: Patients with COPD that transitioned from budesonide/formoterol to fluticasone/salmeterol during the formulary conversion yield no clinical or statistically significant change in their clinical outcomes. Switching between these inhalers in the same therapeutic class may not impact clinical efficacy of the therapy for veterans with COPD but some intolerances and treatment failures should be expected.","PeriodicalId":513268,"journal":{"name":"Federal Practitioner","volume":"102 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal Practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a respiratory disorder associated with chronic and slowly progressive systemic inflammation. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease recommends a combination inhaler of a long-acting β -2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid for patients with a history of frequent exacerbations. In 2021, the US Department of Veterans Affairs transitioned patients who were prescribed budesonide/formoterol inhaler to a fluticasone/ salmeterol inhaler. Methods: The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes including COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations 6 months before vs 6 months after the inhaler transition. Secondary outcomes included adverse effects, treatment failure, tobacco use, and antimicrobial/systemic corticosteroid use. A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with a prescription for a budesonide/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol inhalers between February 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022, at the Hershel “Woody” Williams Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Huntington, West Virginia. Results: In a convenience sample of 100 patients who transitioned from the budesonide/formoterol inhaler to the fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler, exacerbations increased from 24 before the transition to 29 after the transition, which was not a statistically significant change ( P = .56). There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary endpoints including active tobacco use. Three patients had adverse reactions to fluticasone/ salmeterol, while 18 patients experienced a therapeutic failure to fluticasone/salmeterol. Conclusions: Patients with COPD that transitioned from budesonide/formoterol to fluticasone/salmeterol during the formulary conversion yield no clinical or statistically significant change in their clinical outcomes. Switching between these inhalers in the same therapeutic class may not impact clinical efficacy of the therapy for veterans with COPD but some intolerances and treatment failures should be expected.
退伍军人医疗中心将处方中的布地奈德/福莫特罗转换为氟替卡松/沙美特罗的临床意义
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种与慢性、缓慢进展的全身性炎症相关的呼吸系统疾病。慢性阻塞性肺病全球倡议》建议有频繁加重病史的患者使用长效β-2受体激动剂和吸入皮质类固醇的联合吸入剂。2021 年,美国退伍军人事务部将处方布地奈德/福莫特罗吸入剂的患者转为使用氟替卡松/沙美特罗吸入剂。研究方法本研究的主要目的是比较吸入器过渡前 6 个月和过渡后 6 个月的临床结果,包括慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重和住院情况。次要结果包括不良反应、治疗失败、吸烟和抗菌药/系统性皮质类固醇的使用。该研究对西弗吉尼亚州亨廷顿市赫谢尔-威廉姆斯退伍军人事务医疗中心(Hershel "Woody" Williams Veterans Affairs Medical Center)2021年2月1日至2022年5月30日期间开具布地奈德/福莫特罗或氟替卡松/沙美特罗吸入剂处方的患者进行了回顾性病历审查。研究结果在从布地奈德/福莫特罗吸入剂过渡到氟替卡松/沙美特罗吸入剂的100名患者中,病情恶化从过渡前的24例增加到过渡后的29例,变化无统计学意义(P = .56)。包括主动吸烟在内的次要终点差异无统计学意义。3名患者对氟替卡松/沙美特罗产生了不良反应,18名患者对氟替卡松/沙美特罗治疗失败。结论在处方转换过程中,从布地奈德/福莫特罗过渡到氟替卡松/沙美特罗的慢性阻塞性肺病患者的临床结果没有发生临床或统计学意义上的显著变化。在同一治疗类别的吸入剂之间进行转换可能不会影响慢性阻塞性肺病退伍军人的临床疗效,但预计会出现一些不耐受和治疗失败的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信