How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

E. M. L. van der Does de Willebois, Vittoria Bellato, M. Duijvestein, Susan van Dieren, S. Danese, Pierpaolo Sileri, C. Buskens, Andrea Vignali, Willem Bemelman
{"title":"How Reliable Is Endoscopic Scoring of Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn Disease?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"E. M. L. van der Does de Willebois, Vittoria Bellato, M. Duijvestein, Susan van Dieren, S. Danese, Pierpaolo Sileri, C. Buskens, Andrea Vignali, Willem Bemelman","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications.\n \n \n \n A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208.\n \n \n \n Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively.\n \n \n \n This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guidelines advise to perform endoscopic surveillance following ileocolic resection (ICR) in Crohn disease (CD) for timely diagnosis of recurrence. This study aims to assess the variation in endoscopic recurrence (ER) rates in patients after ICR for CD using the most commonly used classification systems, the Rutgeerts score (RS) and modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) classifications. A systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies describing ER < 12 months after an ICR for CD were included. Animal studies, reviews, case reports (<30 included patients), pediatric studies, and letters were excluded. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and Cochrane Collaboration’s tool were used to assess risk of bias. Main outcome was the range of ER rates within 12 months postoperatively, defined as RS ≥ i2 and/or mRS ≥ i2b. A proportional meta-analysis was performed. The final search was performed on January 4, 2022. The study was registered at PROSPERO, CRD42022363208. Seventy-six studies comprising 7751 patients were included. The weighted mean of ER rates in all included studies was 44.0% (95% confidence interval, 43.56–44.43). The overall range was 5.0% to 93.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 29.2–59.0]. The weighted means for RS and mRS were 44.0% and 41.1%, respectively. The variation in ER rates for RS and mRS were 5.0% to 93.0% (IQR, 29.0–59.5) and 19.8% to 62.9% (IQR, 37.3–46.5), respectively. Within studies reporting both RS and mRS, the weighted means for ER were 61.3% and 40.6%, respectively. This study demonstrates a major variation in ER rates after ICR for CD, suggesting a high likelihood of inadequate diagnosis of disease recurrence, with potentially impact on quality of life and health care consumption. Therefore, there is an important need to improve endoscopic scoring of recurrent disease.
克罗恩病术后复发的内镜评分有多可靠?系统回顾与元分析
指南建议在克罗恩病(CD)的回结肠切除术(ICR)后进行内镜监测,以便及时诊断复发。本研究旨在使用最常用的分类系统,即鲁格尔茨评分(RS)和改良鲁格尔茨评分(mRS)分类,评估克罗恩病(CD)ICR术后患者内镜复发(ER)率的变化。 我们使用 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。纳入的文献包括随机对照试验和队列研究,这些研究描述了 CD ICR 后 12 个月内的 ER 情况。动物研究、综述、病例报告(纳入患者<30例)、儿科研究和信件均被排除在外。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表和 Cochrane 协作工具评估偏倚风险。主要结果是术后12个月内的ER率范围,定义为RS≥i2和/或mRS≥i2b。进行了比例荟萃分析。最终检索于2022年1月4日完成。该研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,编号为 CRD42022363208。 共纳入 76 项研究,包括 7751 名患者。所有纳入研究的急诊室率加权平均值为 44.0%(95% 置信区间,43.56-44.43)。总体范围为 5.0% 至 93.0% [四分位数间距 (IQR),29.2-59.0]。RS和mRS的加权平均值分别为44.0%和41.1%。RS和mRS的ER率差异分别为5.0%至93.0%(IQR,29.0-59.5)和19.8%至62.9%(IQR,37.3-46.5)。在同时报告 RS 和 mRS 的研究中,ER 的加权平均值分别为 61.3% 和 40.6%。 这项研究表明,CD 患者在接受 ICR 治疗后的 ER 率存在很大差异,这表明疾病复发诊断不充分的可能性很高,可能会对生活质量和医疗消耗产生影响。因此,亟需改进对复发疾病的内镜评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信