Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la anemia perioperatoria en España

IF 2.3 4区医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

Revista clinica espanola Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rce.2024.02.001

M. Muñoz , S. Aragón , M. Ballesteros , E. Bisbe-Vives , C. Jericó , P. Llamas-Sillero , H.M. Meijide-Míguez , E. Rayó-Martin , M.J. Rodríguez-Suárez

{"title":"Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso sobre el manejo de la anemia perioperatoria en España","authors":"M. Muñoz , S. Aragón , M. Ballesteros , E. Bisbe-Vives , C. Jericó , P. Llamas-Sillero , H.M. Meijide-Míguez , E. Rayó-Martin , M.J. Rodríguez-Suárez","doi":"10.1016/j.rce.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Perioperative anemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, conceptual, logistical and administrative barriers persist that hinder the widespread implementation of protocols for their management. The project coordinator convened a multidisciplinary group of 9 experienced professionals to develop perioperative anemia management algorithms, based on a series of key points (KPs) related to its prevalence, consequences, diagnosis and treatment. These KPs were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, from “strongly disagree [1]” to “strongly agree [5]”. For each KP, consensus was reached when receiving a score of 4 or 5 from at least 7 participants (>75%). Based on the 36 KPs agreed upon, diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms were developed that we believe can facilitate the implementation of programs for early identification and adequate management of perioperative anemia, adapted to the characteristics of the different institutions in our country.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21223,"journal":{"name":"Revista clinica espanola","volume":"224 4","pages":"Pages 225-232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000390/pdfft?md5=4a5ed55b6bbc33f0b8e8faeab052bdf7&pid=1-s2.0-S0014256524000390-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista clinica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014256524000390","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative anemia is an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, conceptual, logistical and administrative barriers persist that hinder the widespread implementation of protocols for their management. The project coordinator convened a multidisciplinary group of 9 experienced professionals to develop perioperative anemia management algorithms, based on a series of key points (KPs) related to its prevalence, consequences, diagnosis and treatment. These KPs were assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, from “strongly disagree [1]” to “strongly agree [5]”. For each KP, consensus was reached when receiving a score of 4 or 5 from at least 7 participants (>75%). Based on the 36 KPs agreed upon, diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms were developed that we believe can facilitate the implementation of programs for early identification and adequate management of perioperative anemia, adapted to the characteristics of the different institutions in our country.

查看原文本刊更多论文

西班牙围手术期贫血管理共识文件执行摘要

围手术期贫血是导致术后发病率和死亡率的一个独立风险因素。然而，概念、后勤和行政方面的障碍依然存在，阻碍了其管理规程的广泛实施。项目协调人召集了一个由 9 位经验丰富的专业人士组成的多学科小组，根据与围术期贫血的发病率、后果、诊断和治疗相关的一系列关键点（KPs），制定围术期贫血管理算法。这些关键点采用 5 点李克特量表进行评估，从 "非常不同意[1]"到 "非常同意[5]"。对于每项关键绩效，如果至少有 7 位参与者（75%）打出 4 分或 5 分，则达成共识。根据已达成共识的 36 项 KP，我们制定了诊断-治疗算法，我们相信这些算法有助于实施早期识别和适当管理围手术期贫血的计划，并适合我国不同机构的特点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Revista clinica espanola 医学-医学：内科

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

6.90%

发文量

审稿时长

28 days

期刊介绍： Revista Clínica Española published its first issue in 1940 and is the body of expression of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI). The journal fully endorses the goals of updating knowledge and facilitating the acquisition of key developments in internal medicine applied to clinical practice. Revista Clínica Española is subject to a thorough double blind review of the received articles written in Spanish or English. Nine issues are published each year, including mostly originals, reviews and consensus documents.