{"title":"The right to freedom of expression and its limitations according to Albanian legislation","authors":"Anton Gera","doi":"10.2478/ajbals-2024-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The right to freedom of expression, not without purpose provided for in the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, is one of the main basic rights on which modern democratic states were founded. The enjoyment of this freedom is closely related to a series of other equally basic rights, such as freedom of belief, freedom of organization, the right not to be harassed for personal opinions, the freedom to be attached to a certain political party, etc (Salvatore, 2019). The right to freedom of expression is one of the oldest freedoms that arose as a result of freedom of religion, mentioned by the first Christian writers during the II-III century, and then during the conflicts between Catholics and Protestants in the centuries XVI-XVII.\n On the other hand, it was encouraged and elaborated by the great theorists of the freedom of scientific research (just think of Descartes and Galileo) and of political freedom (such as Milton). Later, the right of Freedom of Expression was elaborated by philosophers of the XVIII-XIX centuries such as Voltaire, Fichte, Benthan. In this sense, John Stuart Mill said that freedom of expression protects us from corrupt power, tyranny, and this freedom is one of the basic guarantees for an open and pluralistic society (Mihajllova, Bacovaska and Shekerxhiev, 2013). Since the circulation of ideas is a prerequisite for the communication of thought, the freedom of expression or manifestation of thought has always been considered by Italian constitutional jurisprudence as the cornerstone of the democratic system (Bin and Pitruzzella, 2012). Main objective of this manuscript is the analysis of the Albanian legislation and jurisprudence about the freedom of expression.","PeriodicalId":358300,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","volume":"487 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ajbals-2024-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The right to freedom of expression, not without purpose provided for in the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, is one of the main basic rights on which modern democratic states were founded. The enjoyment of this freedom is closely related to a series of other equally basic rights, such as freedom of belief, freedom of organization, the right not to be harassed for personal opinions, the freedom to be attached to a certain political party, etc (Salvatore, 2019). The right to freedom of expression is one of the oldest freedoms that arose as a result of freedom of religion, mentioned by the first Christian writers during the II-III century, and then during the conflicts between Catholics and Protestants in the centuries XVI-XVII.
On the other hand, it was encouraged and elaborated by the great theorists of the freedom of scientific research (just think of Descartes and Galileo) and of political freedom (such as Milton). Later, the right of Freedom of Expression was elaborated by philosophers of the XVIII-XIX centuries such as Voltaire, Fichte, Benthan. In this sense, John Stuart Mill said that freedom of expression protects us from corrupt power, tyranny, and this freedom is one of the basic guarantees for an open and pluralistic society (Mihajllova, Bacovaska and Shekerxhiev, 2013). Since the circulation of ideas is a prerequisite for the communication of thought, the freedom of expression or manifestation of thought has always been considered by Italian constitutional jurisprudence as the cornerstone of the democratic system (Bin and Pitruzzella, 2012). Main objective of this manuscript is the analysis of the Albanian legislation and jurisprudence about the freedom of expression.
美利坚合众国宪法第一修正案不无道理地规定了言论自由权,这是现代民主国家赖 以建立的主要基本权利之一。享有这一自由与其他一系列同样基本的权利密切相关,如信仰自由、组织自由、不因个人观点受到骚扰的权利、加入某一政党的自由等(Salvatore,2019)。表达自由权是因宗教自由而产生的最古老的自由之一,最早的基督教作家在二至三世纪时就提到过,后来在十六至十七世纪天主教与新教冲突期间也提到过。另一方面,科学研究自由的伟大理论家(想想笛卡尔和伽利略)和政治自由的伟大理论家(如弥尔顿)鼓励并阐述了这一权利。后来,十八至十九世纪的哲学家们,如伏尔泰、费希特和本坦,对表达自由权进行了阐述。在这个意义上,约翰-斯图尔特-米尔(John Stuart Mill)说,表达自由保护我们不受腐败权力和暴政的侵害,这种自由是开放和多元化社会的基本保障之一(Mihajllova, Bacovaska and Shekerxhiev, 2013)。由于思想的流通是思想交流的先决条件,意大利宪法判例一直将表达或表现思想的自由视为民主制度的基石(Bin and Pitruzzella, 2012)。本手稿的主要目的是分析阿尔巴尼亚有关表达自由的立法和判例。