Desire, Reason, and Intellect in Nicomachean Ethics 6

Patrick Corry
{"title":"Desire, Reason, and Intellect in Nicomachean Ethics 6","authors":"Patrick Corry","doi":"10.1353/rvm.2024.a922069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article proposes a via media between intellectualism and nonrationalism on the question of how, according to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , a virtuous person determines the goal ( telos ) for action ( praxis ). The author argues that, according to Aristotle, the goal is set neither by discursive reasoning nor by well-formed nonrational desires but, rather, by practical intellect ( nous ), which is a capacity for nondiscursive perception ( aisthēsis ) of a singular action as choiceworthy in itself. He argues that for Aristotle the activity of nous completes and perfects the operation of prudence ( phronēsis ) or excellent practical thinking, and that this operation essentially includes a distinctively intellectual desire, which is required both for the correct perception of final actions and for the movement of the deliberating agent to act.","PeriodicalId":507479,"journal":{"name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"22 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Review of Metaphysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rvm.2024.a922069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This article proposes a via media between intellectualism and nonrationalism on the question of how, according to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , a virtuous person determines the goal ( telos ) for action ( praxis ). The author argues that, according to Aristotle, the goal is set neither by discursive reasoning nor by well-formed nonrational desires but, rather, by practical intellect ( nous ), which is a capacity for nondiscursive perception ( aisthēsis ) of a singular action as choiceworthy in itself. He argues that for Aristotle the activity of nous completes and perfects the operation of prudence ( phronēsis ) or excellent practical thinking, and that this operation essentially includes a distinctively intellectual desire, which is required both for the correct perception of final actions and for the movement of the deliberating agent to act.
尼各马可伦理学》中的欲望、理性和理智 6
摘要:本文就亚里士多德的《尼各马可伦理学》中 "有德行的人如何确定行动(实践)的目标(telos)"这一问题,提出了一种介于理智主义和非理智主义之间的媒介。作者认为,根据亚里士多德的观点,目标既不是通过辨证推理也不是通过形成良好的非理性欲望确定的,而是通过实践智慧(nous)确定的,实践智慧是一种非辨证的感知能力(aisthēsis),这种感知能力认为一个独特的行动本身是值得选择的。他认为,在亚里士多德看来,"智 "的活动完成并完善了 "审慎"(phronēsis)或卓越的实践思维的运作,而这一运作本质上包括一种独特的智性欲望,它既是对最终行动的正确认知所必需的,也是慎思者行动的动力所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信