Comprehensive Study of Soil Subgrade Reaction Using Different Constitutive Soil Models

Mohammed AbdelAziz
{"title":"Comprehensive Study of Soil Subgrade Reaction Using Different Constitutive Soil Models","authors":"Mohammed AbdelAziz","doi":"10.21608/fuje.2024.343759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oftentimes, static analysis of a slab supported by vertical uncoupled Winkler springs is frequently utilized in the structural design of shallow foundations. Many structural designers typically simulate the soil beneath the footing and the raft as a collection of springs with stiffness coefficient estimated based on the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks). Therefore, various approaches for determining ks are compared and reviewed in this work . The main objective of this study is to estimate the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) of the shallow foundation rested on sandy layer adopting three constitutive soil models (Elastic, Mohr-Coulomb and Hardening soil) utilizing 3D Plaxis analysis. Two parametric studies have been implemented (isolated footing and raft) taking into consideration the effects of foundation thickness and soil constitutive model on ks . The results outlined in this paper show that a thicker footing typically has a lower soil subgrade reaction than one that is thinner; and the estimation of ks based on empirical formulas is being convenient in case of isolated footing. On the other side, the distribution of ks is non-uniform through the raft for all adopted soil models analyses. ks (when considering soil plasticity) is lesser than ks estimated using elastic soil analysis. Using non-linear finite element analysis (considering the soil plasticity) is very important to get more accurate ks and do not depend only on the empirical formulas to evaluate ks of the raft .","PeriodicalId":267155,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Journal of Engineering","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fuje.2024.343759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oftentimes, static analysis of a slab supported by vertical uncoupled Winkler springs is frequently utilized in the structural design of shallow foundations. Many structural designers typically simulate the soil beneath the footing and the raft as a collection of springs with stiffness coefficient estimated based on the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks). Therefore, various approaches for determining ks are compared and reviewed in this work . The main objective of this study is to estimate the modulus of subgrade reaction (ks) of the shallow foundation rested on sandy layer adopting three constitutive soil models (Elastic, Mohr-Coulomb and Hardening soil) utilizing 3D Plaxis analysis. Two parametric studies have been implemented (isolated footing and raft) taking into consideration the effects of foundation thickness and soil constitutive model on ks . The results outlined in this paper show that a thicker footing typically has a lower soil subgrade reaction than one that is thinner; and the estimation of ks based on empirical formulas is being convenient in case of isolated footing. On the other side, the distribution of ks is non-uniform through the raft for all adopted soil models analyses. ks (when considering soil plasticity) is lesser than ks estimated using elastic soil analysis. Using non-linear finite element analysis (considering the soil plasticity) is very important to get more accurate ks and do not depend only on the empirical formulas to evaluate ks of the raft .
利用不同的土壤组成模型全面研究土壤路基反力
在浅基础的结构设计中,通常会对由垂直无耦合温克勒弹簧支撑的楼板进行静力分析。许多结构设计师通常将基底和筏板下的土壤模拟为一系列弹簧,其刚度系数根据基底反力模量(ks)估算。因此,本研究对确定 ks 的各种方法进行了比较和审查。本研究的主要目的是利用三维 Plaxis 分析,采用三种土壤构成模型(弹性土、莫尔-库仑土和硬化土)估算砂层上浅层地基的基底反力模量(ks)。考虑到地基厚度和土构成模型对 ks 的影响,进行了两项参数研究(孤立基脚和筏基)。本文概述的结果表明,与较薄的地基相比,较厚的地基通常具有较低的土基反力;在孤立地基的情况下,根据经验公式估算 ks 比较方便。另一方面,在所有采用的土壤模型分析中,ks 在筏上的分布都是不均匀的。ks(考虑土壤塑性时)小于采用弹性土壤分析估算的 ks。使用非线性有限元分析(考虑土壤塑性)对获得更精确的 ks 非常重要,而不能仅依赖经验公式来评估筏的 ks。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信