Environmental Assessment/Evaluation of 3D Printing and 3D Printing with Wood-PLA Composites - Case Study

Teja Bizjak Govedič, Daša Krapež Tomec, Manja Kitek Kuzman, L. Oblak, B. Glavonjić
{"title":"Environmental Assessment/Evaluation of 3D Printing and 3D Printing with Wood-PLA Composites - Case Study","authors":"Teja Bizjak Govedič, Daša Krapež Tomec, Manja Kitek Kuzman, L. Oblak, B. Glavonjić","doi":"10.5552/drvind.2024.0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, additive manufacturing has become a regular process in various industries, and consequently there is an increasing need to evaluate the environmental aspects of this technology and its associated materials. In this paper, comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments between a conventional product and a 3D-printed alternative made of polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA-wood material were investigated based on the standard ISO 14044:2006. The environmental impact of each product was quantified for 18 categories. The goal of life cycle assessment (LCA) was to determine whether the use of 3D printed PLA/PLA-wood products can be a sustainable alternative to traditional metal products. The paper presents a case study in which a comparative LCA was conducted. The results show that a metal part manufactured using conventional subtractive processes (milling, drilling, welding, etc.) has a higher environmental impact compared to 3D-printed alternatives made from renewable materials. However, there are many sub-issues that need to be adequately addressed.","PeriodicalId":503192,"journal":{"name":"Drvna industrija","volume":"35 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drvna industrija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5552/drvind.2024.0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, additive manufacturing has become a regular process in various industries, and consequently there is an increasing need to evaluate the environmental aspects of this technology and its associated materials. In this paper, comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessments between a conventional product and a 3D-printed alternative made of polylactic acid (PLA) and PLA-wood material were investigated based on the standard ISO 14044:2006. The environmental impact of each product was quantified for 18 categories. The goal of life cycle assessment (LCA) was to determine whether the use of 3D printed PLA/PLA-wood products can be a sustainable alternative to traditional metal products. The paper presents a case study in which a comparative LCA was conducted. The results show that a metal part manufactured using conventional subtractive processes (milling, drilling, welding, etc.) has a higher environmental impact compared to 3D-printed alternatives made from renewable materials. However, there are many sub-issues that need to be adequately addressed.
三维打印和使用木材-PLA 复合材料进行三维打印的环境评估/评价 - 案例研究
近年来,增材制造已成为各行各业的常规工艺,因此越来越有必要对该技术及其相关材料的环境方面进行评估。本文根据 ISO 14044:2006 标准,对传统产品与由聚乳酸(PLA)和聚乳酸木质材料制成的 3D 打印替代产品进行了 "从摇篮到坟墓 "生命周期比较评估。每种产品对环境的影响被量化为 18 个类别。生命周期评估(LCA)的目的是确定使用三维打印聚乳酸/聚乳酸木材产品能否成为传统金属产品的可持续替代品。本文介绍了一项进行生命周期评估比较的案例研究。结果表明,使用传统减法工艺(铣削、钻孔、焊接等)制造的金属零件与使用可再生材料制造的 3D 打印替代品相比,对环境的影响更大。然而,还有许多子问题需要充分解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信