Rejection of malathion by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes exposed to foulant and two clean-in-place procedures

Water Supply Pub Date : 2024-03-02 DOI:10.2166/ws.2024.043
A. Mikelonis, Christopher J. Orme, Amit S. Nilkar, Jeffrey G. Szabo, Stephen J. Reese
{"title":"Rejection of malathion by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes exposed to foulant and two clean-in-place procedures","authors":"A. Mikelonis, Christopher J. Orme, Amit S. Nilkar, Jeffrey G. Szabo, Stephen J. Reese","doi":"10.2166/ws.2024.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This research tested the treatment efficacy of an ESNA1-LF nanofiltration (NF) and an ESPA2 reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for removing malathion from water. Both membranes are of composite polyamide construction. The study included measuring malathion rejection using both pristine membranes and membranes exposed to a simulated secondary wastewater effluent foulant before and after two types of clean-in-place procedures. Across all conditions studied, malathion rejection ranged from 84 to 95% for the ESNA1-LF NF membrane and 77 to 94% for the ESPA2 RO membrane. Contact angle measurements were also collected for each membrane exposure condition. While the contact angle measurements indicated changes to the hydrophobicity of the selective layer of the membranes, they did not correlate to changes in the performance of malathion rejection. As expected, it was observed that malathion rejection improved with the introduction of foulant. Also, the clean-in-place procedures helped restore flux while maintaining malathion rejection.","PeriodicalId":23725,"journal":{"name":"Water Supply","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Supply","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2024.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research tested the treatment efficacy of an ESNA1-LF nanofiltration (NF) and an ESPA2 reverse osmosis (RO) membrane for removing malathion from water. Both membranes are of composite polyamide construction. The study included measuring malathion rejection using both pristine membranes and membranes exposed to a simulated secondary wastewater effluent foulant before and after two types of clean-in-place procedures. Across all conditions studied, malathion rejection ranged from 84 to 95% for the ESNA1-LF NF membrane and 77 to 94% for the ESPA2 RO membrane. Contact angle measurements were also collected for each membrane exposure condition. While the contact angle measurements indicated changes to the hydrophobicity of the selective layer of the membranes, they did not correlate to changes in the performance of malathion rejection. As expected, it was observed that malathion rejection improved with the introduction of foulant. Also, the clean-in-place procedures helped restore flux while maintaining malathion rejection.
纳滤膜和反渗透膜对暴露在污物中的马拉硫磷的排斥以及两种就地清洁程序
这项研究测试了 ESNA1-LF 纳滤膜和 ESPA2 反渗透膜去除水中马拉硫磷的处理效果。这两种膜都是复合聚酰胺结构。研究包括使用原始膜和暴露于模拟二级废水污水污物的膜,在两种类型的就地清洁程序之前和之后测量马拉硫磷的去除率。在所有研究条件下,ESNA1-LF NF 膜的马拉硫磷去除率为 84% 至 95%,ESPA2 RO 膜的去除率为 77% 至 94%。还收集了每种膜暴露条件下的接触角测量值。虽然接触角测量结果表明膜选择层的疏水性发生了变化,但它们与马拉硫磷去除性能的变化并不相关。不出所料,随着污垢剂的引入,马拉硫磷的去除效果有所改善。此外,就地清洁程序有助于恢复通量,同时保持马拉硫磷去除率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信