Relevant dimensions to give meaning to pension decisions

Jelle Strikwerda, B. Holleman, Hans Hoeken
{"title":"Relevant dimensions to give meaning to pension decisions","authors":"Jelle Strikwerda, B. Holleman, Hans Hoeken","doi":"10.1093/workar/waae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Pension participants face complex decisions. Information about the decision alternatives often contains the exact monetary amounts associated with the alternatives. Grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), we argue that informed decision making requires participants to (accurately) understand meaningful differences between decision alternatives, rather than to rely on purely numerical differences in amounts. The objective of this study was to identify, for three decisions Dutch participants can make regarding their old-age pension, what dimensions participants take into account when giving meaning to the decision alternatives. We conducted 39 semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch pension participants in which we discussed the considerations of participants to choose for the decision alternatives. These interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Our analysis shows that a number of dimensions are taken into account, partially overlapping for the three decisions: life expectancy, (in)sufficient income, financial maximization, work–life balance, and job satisfaction. According to FTT, participants can be supported in extracting meaningful representations by providing cues about the dimensions that might be affected by the various decision alternatives. The dimensions identified in this paper can serve as a useful starting point for such support.","PeriodicalId":513098,"journal":{"name":"Work, Aging and Retirement","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work, Aging and Retirement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pension participants face complex decisions. Information about the decision alternatives often contains the exact monetary amounts associated with the alternatives. Grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory (FTT), we argue that informed decision making requires participants to (accurately) understand meaningful differences between decision alternatives, rather than to rely on purely numerical differences in amounts. The objective of this study was to identify, for three decisions Dutch participants can make regarding their old-age pension, what dimensions participants take into account when giving meaning to the decision alternatives. We conducted 39 semi-structured in-depth interviews with Dutch pension participants in which we discussed the considerations of participants to choose for the decision alternatives. These interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Our analysis shows that a number of dimensions are taken into account, partially overlapping for the three decisions: life expectancy, (in)sufficient income, financial maximization, work–life balance, and job satisfaction. According to FTT, participants can be supported in extracting meaningful representations by providing cues about the dimensions that might be affected by the various decision alternatives. The dimensions identified in this paper can serve as a useful starting point for such support.
赋予养老金决策意义的相关方面
养老金参与者面临着复杂的决策。有关备选决策方案的信息往往包含与备选方案相关的确切货币金额。基于模糊跟踪理论(FTT),我们认为,知情决策要求参与者(准确)理解决策备选方案之间有意义的差异,而不是依赖于纯粹的金额数字差异。本研究的目的是确定荷兰参与者可以就其养老金问题做出的三项决策,即参与者在赋予决策选择意义时会考虑哪些因素。我们对荷兰养老金参保人进行了 39 次半结构式深度访谈,讨论了参保人在选择决策备选方案时的考虑因素。我们采用主题分析法对这些访谈进行了分析。我们的分析表明,在三个决策中,参与者考虑了多个方面,其中部分方面是重叠的:预期寿命、(不)充足的收入、财务最大化、工作与生活的平衡以及工作满意度。根据公平贸易条约,可以通过提供可能受各种决策备选方案影响的维度线索,帮助参与者提取有意义的表征。本文所确定的维度可以作为提供此类支持的有用起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信