Comparison of Pressure-Based and Skin Friction-based Methods for the Determination of Flow Separation of a Circular Cylinder with Roundness
Imperfection
{"title":"Comparison of Pressure-Based and Skin Friction-based Methods for the Determination of Flow Separation of a Circular Cylinder with Roundness\nImperfection","authors":"Ran Wang, Shaohong Cheng, David S.-K. Ting","doi":"10.2174/0122102981289400240228182937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nA delayed detached eddy simulation in OpenFOAM was performed to\nstudy flow separation of a circular cylinder with roundness imperfection up to 4% of its diameter\nat Reynolds numbers of 100, 3900, and 10! in normal flow.\n\n\n\nThe flow was considered to be Newtonian and incompressible. The separation position\nwas determined independently based on surface pressure distribution and skin friction.\n\n\n\nResults show that the patterns of these distributions depend on both Reynolds number and\nroundness imperfection level, and flow separation in an imperfectly round cylinder may be induced\nby either an adverse pressure gradient or a Gentle Bend (GB) introduced by the roughness.\nFor the separation point determined by the pressure-based method, its accuracy can be affected by\nthe characteristic of pressure distribution near the separation point at low Reynolds numbers, and,\nthus, its physical validity needs to be verified by flow visualization at high Reynolds numbers.\n\n\n\nThe skin friction-based method can accurately predict separation point for both perfectly\nand imperfectly round cylinders without additional information. When the roundness imperfection\nratio reaches 2% and the Reynolds number reaches 3900, both approaches indicate that the\nflow separation point converges to the location of GB on the cylinder surface and the two sets of\npredicted separation points agree well.\n","PeriodicalId":184819,"journal":{"name":"Current Chinese Science","volume":"25 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Chinese Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0122102981289400240228182937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A delayed detached eddy simulation in OpenFOAM was performed to
study flow separation of a circular cylinder with roundness imperfection up to 4% of its diameter
at Reynolds numbers of 100, 3900, and 10! in normal flow.
The flow was considered to be Newtonian and incompressible. The separation position
was determined independently based on surface pressure distribution and skin friction.
Results show that the patterns of these distributions depend on both Reynolds number and
roundness imperfection level, and flow separation in an imperfectly round cylinder may be induced
by either an adverse pressure gradient or a Gentle Bend (GB) introduced by the roughness.
For the separation point determined by the pressure-based method, its accuracy can be affected by
the characteristic of pressure distribution near the separation point at low Reynolds numbers, and,
thus, its physical validity needs to be verified by flow visualization at high Reynolds numbers.
The skin friction-based method can accurately predict separation point for both perfectly
and imperfectly round cylinders without additional information. When the roundness imperfection
ratio reaches 2% and the Reynolds number reaches 3900, both approaches indicate that the
flow separation point converges to the location of GB on the cylinder surface and the two sets of
predicted separation points agree well.