Awareness Dental Specialists about Different Treatment Modalities to Replace Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisors

Aiman Elmabruk, Ahmed Mhanni, Hisham Shembesh, Abdulghani Alarabi
{"title":"Awareness Dental Specialists about Different Treatment Modalities to Replace Congenitally Missing Lateral Incisors","authors":"Aiman Elmabruk, Ahmed Mhanni, Hisham Shembesh, Abdulghani Alarabi","doi":"10.47705/kjdmr.248106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the dentists' and dental experts' knowledge of orthodontic closure vs. replacement as treatment options for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Methods. A cross-sectional study involving 185 dentists from several areas was carried out between September and October of 2023. A set of twenty-four multiple-choice questions was developed. Microsoft Excel 2010 was used for data collection, while SPSS version 26 was used for analysis utilising descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. Results. A study of 185 questionnaires found that the majority of participants were general practitioners, with 56.6% working in private and government-funded clinics. Most participants exhibited an elevated incidence of lateral incisor tooth absence, a trend frequently identified through routine diagnostic procedures. A dentist with over ten years of experience identified a growing occurrence of lateral incisor tooth absence, calling for a specialised treatment approach. Participants generally preferred dental implants over orthodontics, fixed prostheses, and removable prostheses. Most general practitioners, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, and orthodontists preferred implant replacement for long-term aesthetic and functional results. The study found significantly those general practitioners and oral surgeons mostly stay updated on missing lateral incisor treatment through continuing education courses, while orthodontists and prosthodontists prefer reading professional journals. Conclusion. It is evident that the prevalence of tooth agenesis has increased, leading to a heightened demand for specialised dental treatment. Management of this anomaly requires comprehensive planning, considering self-consciousness, aesthetics, and malocclusion. The study emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of missing lateral incisors to ensure optimal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":436335,"journal":{"name":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47705/kjdmr.248106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the dentists' and dental experts' knowledge of orthodontic closure vs. replacement as treatment options for congenitally missing lateral incisors. Methods. A cross-sectional study involving 185 dentists from several areas was carried out between September and October of 2023. A set of twenty-four multiple-choice questions was developed. Microsoft Excel 2010 was used for data collection, while SPSS version 26 was used for analysis utilising descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests. Results. A study of 185 questionnaires found that the majority of participants were general practitioners, with 56.6% working in private and government-funded clinics. Most participants exhibited an elevated incidence of lateral incisor tooth absence, a trend frequently identified through routine diagnostic procedures. A dentist with over ten years of experience identified a growing occurrence of lateral incisor tooth absence, calling for a specialised treatment approach. Participants generally preferred dental implants over orthodontics, fixed prostheses, and removable prostheses. Most general practitioners, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, and orthodontists preferred implant replacement for long-term aesthetic and functional results. The study found significantly those general practitioners and oral surgeons mostly stay updated on missing lateral incisor treatment through continuing education courses, while orthodontists and prosthodontists prefer reading professional journals. Conclusion. It is evident that the prevalence of tooth agenesis has increased, leading to a heightened demand for specialised dental treatment. Management of this anomaly requires comprehensive planning, considering self-consciousness, aesthetics, and malocclusion. The study emphasises the need for a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of missing lateral incisors to ensure optimal outcomes.
提高牙科专家对替换先天性缺失侧切牙的不同治疗方式的认识
研究目的本研究旨在了解牙医和牙科专家对正畸封闭与替换作为先天性侧切牙缺失治疗方案的认识。研究方法。在 2023 年 9 月至 10 月期间进行了一项横断面研究,涉及多个地区的 185 名牙医。研究编制了一套 24 道选择题。数据收集使用 Microsoft Excel 2010,分析使用 SPSS 26 版本的描述性统计和卡方检验。研究结果对 185 份问卷的研究发现,大多数参与者是全科医生,其中 56.6% 在私人和政府资助的诊所工作。大多数参与者的侧切牙缺失率较高,这一趋势经常通过常规诊断程序发现。一位有十多年经验的牙医发现,侧切牙缺失的发生率越来越高,这就需要采取专门的治疗方法。与正畸、固定义齿和活动义齿相比,与会者普遍更倾向于种植牙。大多数全科医生、口腔外科医生、口腔修复医生和口腔正畸医生更倾向于种植体替代,以获得长期的美观和功能效果。研究发现,全科医生和口腔外科医生大多通过继续教育课程了解侧切牙缺失治疗的最新进展,而正畸医生和修复医生则更喜欢阅读专业期刊。结论牙齿缺失症的发病率明显增加,导致对专业牙科治疗的需求增加。处理这种异常情况需要全面的规划,考虑到自我意识、美观和咬合不正等因素。这项研究强调,在治疗侧切牙缺失时需要采用多学科方法,以确保取得最佳疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信