Relation of organic fractions in fresh and stored fecal sludge and foodwaste to biogas production

Nida Maqbool, S. Sam, Sher Jamal Khan, L. Strande
{"title":"Relation of organic fractions in fresh and stored fecal sludge and foodwaste to biogas production","authors":"Nida Maqbool, S. Sam, Sher Jamal Khan, L. Strande","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2024.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There is limited understanding of the potential for anaerobic digestion and biogas production from fecal sludge. In this study, biomethane potential (BMP) tests from fresh, stored, and dewatered fecal sludge, together with co-digestion with fresh foodwaste, revealed that fresh fecal sludge produced similar cumulative biogas (CBG) to fresh foodwaste (615–627 mL/gVS), while stored fecal sludge showed a wide range of gas production (13–449 mL/gVS). Co-digestion significantly enhanced the CBG production of fresh (1.2×), dewatered (1.5×), and stored (29–36×) fecal sludge. In BMP tests with the higher range of gas production, a biphasic CBG production was observed, with degradation of readily biodegradable organics occurring during the first week. The first-order rate coefficients indicated hydrolysis limitation, which was also confirmed by the presence of slow-growing methanogens (Halobacterota). Priming with co-digestion significantly enhanced CBG from stored fecal sludge. The physical–chemical metrics VS/TS and TOC/TN were not predictors of biogas production, while BOD/COD and sCOD were better indicators, suggesting that metrics of stabilization representing biologically available fractions are more representative than metrics of entire pools of organic matter. This study suggests that biogas production from anaerobic digestion is viable for fresh fecal sludge, whereas for stored fecal sludge, this requires co-treatment or pretreatment.","PeriodicalId":516652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2024.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is limited understanding of the potential for anaerobic digestion and biogas production from fecal sludge. In this study, biomethane potential (BMP) tests from fresh, stored, and dewatered fecal sludge, together with co-digestion with fresh foodwaste, revealed that fresh fecal sludge produced similar cumulative biogas (CBG) to fresh foodwaste (615–627 mL/gVS), while stored fecal sludge showed a wide range of gas production (13–449 mL/gVS). Co-digestion significantly enhanced the CBG production of fresh (1.2×), dewatered (1.5×), and stored (29–36×) fecal sludge. In BMP tests with the higher range of gas production, a biphasic CBG production was observed, with degradation of readily biodegradable organics occurring during the first week. The first-order rate coefficients indicated hydrolysis limitation, which was also confirmed by the presence of slow-growing methanogens (Halobacterota). Priming with co-digestion significantly enhanced CBG from stored fecal sludge. The physical–chemical metrics VS/TS and TOC/TN were not predictors of biogas production, while BOD/COD and sCOD were better indicators, suggesting that metrics of stabilization representing biologically available fractions are more representative than metrics of entire pools of organic matter. This study suggests that biogas production from anaerobic digestion is viable for fresh fecal sludge, whereas for stored fecal sludge, this requires co-treatment or pretreatment.
新鲜和储存的粪便污泥和食物垃圾中的有机成分与沼气生产的关系
人们对粪便污泥厌氧消化和生产沼气的潜力了解有限。在这项研究中,对新鲜、贮存和脱水粪便污泥的生物甲烷潜力(BMP)以及与新鲜食物垃圾的协同消化进行了测试,结果表明,新鲜粪便污泥产生的累积沼气(CBG)与新鲜食物垃圾相似(615-627 mL/gVS),而贮存粪便污泥的产气量范围较广(13-449 mL/gVS)。协同消化大大提高了新鲜污泥(1.2 倍)、脱水污泥(1.5 倍)和储存污泥(29-36 倍)的 CBG 产量。在产气量范围较高的生物处理厂试验中,观察到双相 CBG 产气量,易生物降解有机物的降解发生在第一周。一阶速率系数表明水解受到限制,生长缓慢的甲烷菌(Halobacterota)的存在也证实了这一点。通过协同消化进行预处理,可显著提高贮存粪便污泥的 CBG。物理化学指标 VS/TS 和 TOC/TN 不能预测沼气产量,而 BOD/COD 和 sCOD 则是更好的指标,这表明代表生物可用部分的稳定化指标比整个有机物池的指标更具代表性。这项研究表明,厌氧消化产生沼气对新鲜粪便污泥是可行的,而对储存的粪便污泥则需要协同处理或预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信