Pollinator responses to farmland habitat features: one-size does not fit all

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Stephanie Maher, Ruth Kelly, S. Hodge, Ellen O'Hora, S. Ruas, Roser Rotchés‐Ribalta, Alan Lee, Blanaid White, Mike Gormally, James Moran, D. Ó hUallacháin, Jane C Stout
{"title":"Pollinator responses to farmland habitat features: one-size does not fit all","authors":"Stephanie Maher, Ruth Kelly, S. Hodge, Ellen O'Hora, S. Ruas, Roser Rotchés‐Ribalta, Alan Lee, Blanaid White, Mike Gormally, James Moran, D. Ó hUallacháin, Jane C Stout","doi":"10.26786/1920-7603(2024)753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nGlobally, pollinating insects face significant pressure, largely due to intensively managed agricultural systems. There has been considerable focus on the provision of resources for pollinators in agricultural landscapes, but without understanding how existing farmland habitats affect pollinators there is a risk these conservation actions could fail.\nThe aim of this study was to explore the relationships between the quantity, diversity, and quality of on-farm habitats with pollinator communities. To meet this aim, pollinator, floral and habitat features were assessed at twenty-nine sites, encompassing both livestock and crop systems, at a range of farming intensities, in two regions of Ireland.\nResults showed that the three main taxonomic pollinator groups (hoverflies, social bees, and solitary bees) were inconsistent in their responses to habitat and environmental variables. Hoverflies were negatively associated with farms with increasing amounts of linear feature and fewer drainage ditches, whereas bumblebees were positively associated with crop farms and the number of grassy margins, drainage ditches and hedgerows at a site. Solitary bees were negatively associated with crop farms and positively associated with high floral species richness. At a species level, community analysis showed that within taxonomic groups, individual species responded differently to environmental variables.\nThis study demonstrates that different farm types and habitat features impact pollinator groups differently. One-size does not fit all, thus on-farm conservation actions should be designed with knowledge of taxon-specific responses to maximise benefits. The quantity and diversity of essential habitats are important along with the quality of those features in terms of their capacity to provide sufficient resources for pollinators.\n","PeriodicalId":30194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","volume":"20 S6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pollination Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2024)753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, pollinating insects face significant pressure, largely due to intensively managed agricultural systems. There has been considerable focus on the provision of resources for pollinators in agricultural landscapes, but without understanding how existing farmland habitats affect pollinators there is a risk these conservation actions could fail. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between the quantity, diversity, and quality of on-farm habitats with pollinator communities. To meet this aim, pollinator, floral and habitat features were assessed at twenty-nine sites, encompassing both livestock and crop systems, at a range of farming intensities, in two regions of Ireland. Results showed that the three main taxonomic pollinator groups (hoverflies, social bees, and solitary bees) were inconsistent in their responses to habitat and environmental variables. Hoverflies were negatively associated with farms with increasing amounts of linear feature and fewer drainage ditches, whereas bumblebees were positively associated with crop farms and the number of grassy margins, drainage ditches and hedgerows at a site. Solitary bees were negatively associated with crop farms and positively associated with high floral species richness. At a species level, community analysis showed that within taxonomic groups, individual species responded differently to environmental variables. This study demonstrates that different farm types and habitat features impact pollinator groups differently. One-size does not fit all, thus on-farm conservation actions should be designed with knowledge of taxon-specific responses to maximise benefits. The quantity and diversity of essential habitats are important along with the quality of those features in terms of their capacity to provide sufficient resources for pollinators.
授粉昆虫对农田生境特征的反应:一刀切的做法不可取
在全球范围内,授粉昆虫面临着巨大的压力,这主要是由于集约化管理的农业系统造成的。为农业景观中的传粉昆虫提供资源一直是人们关注的焦点,但如果不了解现有的农田栖息地如何影响传粉昆虫,这些保护行动就有可能失败。为了实现这一目标,我们在爱尔兰两个地区的 29 个地点评估了传粉昆虫、花卉和栖息地特征,这些地点既包括畜牧业系统,也包括农作物系统,而且耕作强度各不相同。结果显示,三个主要的传粉昆虫分类群(食蚜蝇、社会蜂和独居蜂)对栖息地和环境变量的反应不一致。食蚜蝇与线性特征越来越多、排水沟越来越少的农场呈负相关,而熊蜂则与农作物农场、草地边缘、排水沟和绿篱的数量呈正相关。孤蜂与农作物种植园呈负相关,与花卉物种丰富度高呈正相关。在物种层面,群落分析表明,在分类群中,各个物种对环境变量的反应不同。一刀切并不适合所有情况,因此在设计农场保护行动时应了解分类群的具体反应,以实现效益最大化。重要栖息地的数量和多样性以及这些特征的质量都很重要,因为它们有能力为授粉昆虫提供充足的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pollination Ecology
Journal of Pollination Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信