Advancing a Major U.S. Airline’s Practice in Flight-level Checked Baggage Prediction

Shijie Chen, Chiwoo Park, Qianwen Guo, Yanshuo Sun
{"title":"Advancing a Major U.S. Airline’s Practice in Flight-level Checked Baggage Prediction","authors":"Shijie Chen, Chiwoo Park, Qianwen Guo, Yanshuo Sun","doi":"10.1093/iti/liae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we aim to address a relevant estimation problem that aviation professionals encounter in their daily operations. Specifically, aircraft load planners require information on the expected number of checked bags for a flight several hours prior to its scheduled departure to properly palletize and load the aircraft. However, the checked baggage prediction problem has not been sufficiently studied in the literature, particularly at the flight level. Existing prediction approaches have not properly accounted for the different impacts of overestimating and underestimating checked baggage volumes on airline operations. Therefore, we propose a custom loss function, in the form of a piecewise quadratic function, which aligns with airline operations practice and utilizes machine learning algorithms to optimize checked baggage predictions incorporating the new loss function. We consider multiple linear regression, LightGBM, and XGBoost, as supervised learning algorithms. We apply our proposed methods to baggage data from a major airline and additional data from various U.S. government agencies. We compare the performance of the three customized supervised learning algorithms. We find that the two gradient boosting methods (i.e., LightGBM and XGBoost) yield higher accuracy than the multiple linear regression; XGBoost outperforms LightGBM while LightGBM requires much less training time than XGBoost. We also investigate the performance of XGBoost on samples from different categories and provide insights for selecting an appropriate prediction algorithm to improve baggage prediction practices. Our modeling framework can be adapted to address other prediction challenges in aviation, such as predicting the number of standby passengers or no-shows.","PeriodicalId":191628,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Transportation Infrastructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/iti/liae001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to address a relevant estimation problem that aviation professionals encounter in their daily operations. Specifically, aircraft load planners require information on the expected number of checked bags for a flight several hours prior to its scheduled departure to properly palletize and load the aircraft. However, the checked baggage prediction problem has not been sufficiently studied in the literature, particularly at the flight level. Existing prediction approaches have not properly accounted for the different impacts of overestimating and underestimating checked baggage volumes on airline operations. Therefore, we propose a custom loss function, in the form of a piecewise quadratic function, which aligns with airline operations practice and utilizes machine learning algorithms to optimize checked baggage predictions incorporating the new loss function. We consider multiple linear regression, LightGBM, and XGBoost, as supervised learning algorithms. We apply our proposed methods to baggage data from a major airline and additional data from various U.S. government agencies. We compare the performance of the three customized supervised learning algorithms. We find that the two gradient boosting methods (i.e., LightGBM and XGBoost) yield higher accuracy than the multiple linear regression; XGBoost outperforms LightGBM while LightGBM requires much less training time than XGBoost. We also investigate the performance of XGBoost on samples from different categories and provide insights for selecting an appropriate prediction algorithm to improve baggage prediction practices. Our modeling framework can be adapted to address other prediction challenges in aviation, such as predicting the number of standby passengers or no-shows.
推进美国一家大型航空公司在航班托运行李预测方面的实践
本文旨在解决航空专业人员在日常工作中遇到的一个相关估计问题。具体来说,飞机装载计划人员需要在航班预定起飞前几个小时获得航班托运行李预期数量的信息,以便对飞机进行适当的托运和装载。然而,文献中对托运行李预测问题的研究并不充分,尤其是在航班层面。现有的预测方法没有适当考虑高估和低估托运行李量对航空公司运营的不同影响。因此,我们提出了一种符合航空公司运营实践的片断二次函数形式的自定义损失函数,并利用机器学习算法来优化包含新损失函数的托运行李预测。我们将多元线性回归、LightGBM 和 XGBoost 视为监督学习算法。我们将所提出的方法应用于一家大型航空公司的行李数据和美国各政府机构的其他数据。我们比较了三种定制的监督学习算法的性能。我们发现,两种梯度提升方法(即 LightGBM 和 XGBoost)比多元线性回归的准确率更高;XGBoost 的性能优于 LightGBM,而 LightGBM 所需的训练时间比 XGBoost 少得多。我们还研究了 XGBoost 在不同类别样本上的性能,为选择合适的预测算法以改进行李预测实践提供了启示。我们的建模框架可用于解决航空领域的其他预测难题,如预测候补乘客或未到乘客的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信