Public--Private Cooperation Funding Juxtaposed of University--Community Engagement in Europe: Systematic Review

Andi Sri Wahyuni
{"title":"Public--Private Cooperation Funding Juxtaposed of University--Community Engagement in Europe: Systematic Review","authors":"Andi Sri Wahyuni","doi":"10.18502/keg.v6i1.15433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the utilization of public–private funding models in European universities and its implications for community empowerment initiatives, particularly University–Community Engagement (UCE) projects. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the Scopus database, screening 50 articles relating to public–private funding models in European universities. The study reveals that while public–private funding models have gained traction in the academic sphere, they primarily focus on supporting applied science research projects. In contrast, the funding of projects solely oriented toward community empowerment remains limited, with only one article addressing this potential. The findings highlight the challenges associated with employing public–private funding for UCE projects with a strong emphasis on community empowerment. Public–private funding, typically sourced from industry partners, tends to prioritize product innovations and productivity enhancements, posing a mismatch with the social justice-oriented nature of UCE. This discrepancy underscores a significant research gap in UCE and calls for innovative approaches to develop supportive funding frameworks that can effectively sustain UCE initiatives. \nKeywords: public–private funding, university–community engagement, European University","PeriodicalId":106635,"journal":{"name":"KnE Engineering","volume":"26 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KnE Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v6i1.15433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the utilization of public–private funding models in European universities and its implications for community empowerment initiatives, particularly University–Community Engagement (UCE) projects. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the Scopus database, screening 50 articles relating to public–private funding models in European universities. The study reveals that while public–private funding models have gained traction in the academic sphere, they primarily focus on supporting applied science research projects. In contrast, the funding of projects solely oriented toward community empowerment remains limited, with only one article addressing this potential. The findings highlight the challenges associated with employing public–private funding for UCE projects with a strong emphasis on community empowerment. Public–private funding, typically sourced from industry partners, tends to prioritize product innovations and productivity enhancements, posing a mismatch with the social justice-oriented nature of UCE. This discrepancy underscores a significant research gap in UCE and calls for innovative approaches to develop supportive funding frameworks that can effectively sustain UCE initiatives. Keywords: public–private funding, university–community engagement, European University
欧洲大学与社区参与的公私合作并行资助:系统性综述
本文探讨了欧洲大学利用公私资助模式的情况及其对社区赋权计划,特别是大学-社区参与(UCE)项目的影响。我们利用 Scopus 数据库进行了系统的文献综述(SLR),筛选了 50 篇与欧洲大学公私资助模式有关的文章。研究结果表明,虽然公私合作资助模式在学术领域得到了推广,但它们主要侧重于支持应用科学研究项目。与此相反,仅针对社区赋权项目的资助仍然有限,只有一篇文章论述了这一潜力。研究结果突显了在欧洲经委会项目中采用公私合作资助方式所面临的挑战,这些项目非常重视社区赋权。公私资金通常来自行业合作伙伴,往往优先考虑产品创新和提高生产率,与欧洲经委会以社会正义为导向的性质不匹配。这种差异凸显了欧洲经委会在研究方面的巨大差距,并呼吁采取创新方法,制定能够有效维持欧洲经委会各项举措的支持性资助框架。关键词:公私资助;大学-社区参与;欧洲大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信