Comparative study of riemann integral and lebesgue integral in calculus

Qiuran Dong, Yifan He
{"title":"Comparative study of riemann integral and lebesgue integral in calculus","authors":"Qiuran Dong, Yifan He","doi":"10.54254/2753-8818/31/20240731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research paper is to provide a comprehensive comparison between Riemann integral and Lebesgue integral. Integration is described as the inverse process of differentiation, which is used to determine the original function. Riemann integration is a specific type of definite integral applied to find the exact area under a function graph between two limits in a closed interval. Lebesgue integration, on the other hand, provides a more generalized framework for integration theory. Integrals are essential in mathematical modelling and analysis tools. Studying and comparing the similarities and differences between these two integration methods can help us better understand the essence and properties of integrals, so as to more accurately apply integration methods to solve practical problems. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the basics, definitions, concepts, and properties of Riemann integral and Lebesgue integral. Reasoning, proofs, and examples are consolidated to explain the properties and characteristics of these two integral methods. Finally, this paper explores the strengths and limitations of each integration methods, summarising their advantages and applicability to practical problems and providing insights into their respective computational methods and applicability in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":506830,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Natural Science","volume":"6 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Natural Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/31/20240731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research paper is to provide a comprehensive comparison between Riemann integral and Lebesgue integral. Integration is described as the inverse process of differentiation, which is used to determine the original function. Riemann integration is a specific type of definite integral applied to find the exact area under a function graph between two limits in a closed interval. Lebesgue integration, on the other hand, provides a more generalized framework for integration theory. Integrals are essential in mathematical modelling and analysis tools. Studying and comparing the similarities and differences between these two integration methods can help us better understand the essence and properties of integrals, so as to more accurately apply integration methods to solve practical problems. This paper provides a systematic analysis of the basics, definitions, concepts, and properties of Riemann integral and Lebesgue integral. Reasoning, proofs, and examples are consolidated to explain the properties and characteristics of these two integral methods. Finally, this paper explores the strengths and limitations of each integration methods, summarising their advantages and applicability to practical problems and providing insights into their respective computational methods and applicability in different contexts.
微积分中的里曼积分和勒贝格积分的比较研究
本研究论文旨在对黎曼积分和勒贝格积分进行全面比较。积分被描述为微分的逆过程,用于确定原始函数。黎曼积分是一种特定类型的定积分,用于求封闭区间内两个极限之间函数图形下的精确面积。Lebesgue 积分则为积分理论提供了一个更广泛的框架。积分在数学建模和分析工具中是必不可少的。研究和比较这两种积分方法的异同,有助于我们更好地理解积分的本质和特性,从而更准确地应用积分方法解决实际问题。本文系统地分析了黎曼积分和勒贝格积分的基础知识、定义、概念和性质。本文综合了推理、证明和实例,解释了这两种积分方法的性质和特点。最后,本文探讨了每种积分方法的优势和局限性,总结了它们在实际问题中的优势和适用性,并对它们各自的计算方法和在不同情况下的适用性提出了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书