A Comparison of the Results from Artificial Intelligence-based and Human-based Transport-related Thematic Analysis

Findings Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI:10.32866/001c.94401
Thiago Carvalho, Hisham Negm, A. El-geneidy
{"title":"A Comparison of the Results from Artificial Intelligence-based and Human-based Transport-related Thematic Analysis","authors":"Thiago Carvalho, Hisham Negm, A. El-geneidy","doi":"10.32866/001c.94401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) tools (in particular Large Language Models) have the potential to reduce the time needed to perform thematic analysis. To better understand their potential in the transportation field, we compare human-based to AI-based outcomes. Our findings indicate that AI tools, such as ChatGPT, could synthetize and summarize major topics present in our dataset regardless of previous user exposure to the subject or not. Nonetheless, caution is required as results might miss the nuance of less frequent themes. These tools could be used to accelerate the process under the supervision of researchers and practitioners given responder consent and the following of ethical practices.","PeriodicalId":508951,"journal":{"name":"Findings","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.94401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools (in particular Large Language Models) have the potential to reduce the time needed to perform thematic analysis. To better understand their potential in the transportation field, we compare human-based to AI-based outcomes. Our findings indicate that AI tools, such as ChatGPT, could synthetize and summarize major topics present in our dataset regardless of previous user exposure to the subject or not. Nonetheless, caution is required as results might miss the nuance of less frequent themes. These tools could be used to accelerate the process under the supervision of researchers and practitioners given responder consent and the following of ethical practices.
人工智能与人工交通专题分析结果比较
人工智能(AI)工具(尤其是大型语言模型)有可能缩短进行专题分析所需的时间。为了更好地了解这些工具在交通领域的应用潜力,我们比较了人工智能和人工智能的成果。我们的研究结果表明,人工智能工具(如 ChatGPT)可以综合并概括我们数据集中的主要话题,无论用户以前是否接触过该主题。不过,由于结果可能会忽略不常见主题的细微差别,因此需要谨慎对待。在征得应答者同意并遵守道德规范的情况下,可以在研究人员和从业人员的监督下使用这些工具来加快进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信