To Determine the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment Versus Appendectomy in the Management of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Mian Anwar Zeb, Muhammad Usman, Farooq Khan, Siyab Ahmad, Liaqat Ali, Adnan Badar
{"title":"To Determine the Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment Versus Appendectomy in the Management of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis.","authors":"Mian Anwar Zeb, Muhammad Usman, Farooq Khan, Siyab Ahmad, Liaqat Ali, Adnan Badar","doi":"10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.1.797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The vermiform appendix is considered to be a vestigial organ by the most. Its importance in surgery results only from its tendency for inflammation that results in a clinical syndrome known as acute appendicitis. It is the most common indication for emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute abdomen with a crude annual incidence of 26 per 10,000 populations.Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of Conservative Treatment Versus appendectomy in the management of AcuteUncomplicated Appendicitis.Material and Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted in Department of General Surgery Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital Saidu sharif, from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022. A total of 96 cases were enrolled, that were divided into two groups. Informed written consent was taken from each patient. Patients in Group A were subjected to non-operative management with antibiotics while patients in Group B were subjected to appendectomy. Patients in both groups were evaluated for various parameters such as age, gender, pre- and post-operative duration of pain (group B), Alvarado score. Post stratification chi-square test was applied keeping P Value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Mean and SD for Age, Duration of Stay, Pre & Post Treatment Abdominal Score and Pre and Post Treatment Alvarado Score in Group A was recorded as 35±10.60, 3.0±0.24, 7.0±0.49, 3.0±0.20, 9.0±0.41 and 3.0±1.62 respectively. In the same manner, Mean and SD for Group B was 35±12.53, 5.0±0.41, 7.0±0.35, 3.0±0.35, 3.0±0.20, 9.0±0.41, and 2.5±1.5, respectively. Success rate in Group A was 26 (52%) whereas in Group B it was 36 (72%) patients. Conclusion: Conservative treatment can be applied safely in the majority of cases of the first attack of uncomplicated acute appendicitis, therefore, avoiding appendectomy and its associated morbidity and mortality. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Alvarado Score, Antibiotic treatment, Acute uncomplicated appendicitis, Success rate.","PeriodicalId":326561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Saidu Medical College, Swat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52206/jsmc.2024.14.1.797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The vermiform appendix is considered to be a vestigial organ by the most. Its importance in surgery results only from its tendency for inflammation that results in a clinical syndrome known as acute appendicitis. It is the most common indication for emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute abdomen with a crude annual incidence of 26 per 10,000 populations.Objectives: To determine the effectiveness of Conservative Treatment Versus appendectomy in the management of AcuteUncomplicated Appendicitis.Material and Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted in Department of General Surgery Saidu Group of Teaching Hospital Saidu sharif, from 1st January 2022 to 31st December 2022. A total of 96 cases were enrolled, that were divided into two groups. Informed written consent was taken from each patient. Patients in Group A were subjected to non-operative management with antibiotics while patients in Group B were subjected to appendectomy. Patients in both groups were evaluated for various parameters such as age, gender, pre- and post-operative duration of pain (group B), Alvarado score. Post stratification chi-square test was applied keeping P Value < 0.05 as significant. Results: Mean and SD for Age, Duration of Stay, Pre & Post Treatment Abdominal Score and Pre and Post Treatment Alvarado Score in Group A was recorded as 35±10.60, 3.0±0.24, 7.0±0.49, 3.0±0.20, 9.0±0.41 and 3.0±1.62 respectively. In the same manner, Mean and SD for Group B was 35±12.53, 5.0±0.41, 7.0±0.35, 3.0±0.35, 3.0±0.20, 9.0±0.41, and 2.5±1.5, respectively. Success rate in Group A was 26 (52%) whereas in Group B it was 36 (72%) patients. Conclusion: Conservative treatment can be applied safely in the majority of cases of the first attack of uncomplicated acute appendicitis, therefore, avoiding appendectomy and its associated morbidity and mortality. Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Alvarado Score, Antibiotic treatment, Acute uncomplicated appendicitis, Success rate.
确定保守治疗与阑尾切除术在治疗急性无并发症阑尾炎中的效果。
背景:大多数人认为蚯蚓状阑尾是一个附属器官。它在外科手术中的重要性仅仅是因为它容易发炎,从而导致一种被称为急性阑尾炎的临床综合征。急性阑尾炎是急腹症患者最常见的急腹症手术指征,其粗略年发病率为万分之 26:材料与方法:这项随机对照试验于 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日在赛都沙里夫教学医院赛都集团普外科进行。共有 96 个病例入选,分为两组。每位患者均已获得知情的书面同意。A 组患者接受抗生素非手术治疗,B 组患者接受阑尾切除术。两组患者均接受了各种参数评估,如年龄、性别、术前术后疼痛持续时间(B 组)、Alvarado 评分。分层后采用卡方检验,以 P 值小于 0.05 为显著。结果A 组的年龄、住院时间、治疗前后腹部评分和治疗前后 Alvarado 评分的平均值和标码分别为 35±10.60、3.0±0.24、7.0±0.49、3.0±0.20、9.0±0.41 和 3.0±1.62。同样,B 组的平均值和标定值分别为 35±12.53、5.0±0.41、7.0±0.35、3.0±0.35、3.0±0.20、9.0±0.41 和 2.5±1.5。A 组患者的成功率为 26(52%),而 B 组患者的成功率为 36(72%)。结论保守治疗可安全地用于大多数首次发作的无并发症急性阑尾炎病例,从而避免阑尾切除术及其相关的发病率和死亡率。关键词急性阑尾炎 阿尔瓦拉多评分 抗生素治疗 急性无并发症阑尾炎 成功率
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信