Recent Stressful Experiences and Electronic Nicotine Product Use Among Young Adults

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Anda Gherghe, Kalina M L Fahey, Anita Cservenka
{"title":"Recent Stressful Experiences and Electronic Nicotine Product Use\nAmong Young Adults","authors":"Anda Gherghe, Kalina M L Fahey, Anita Cservenka","doi":"10.2174/0126660822288158240228094043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe goal of the current study was to examine how\nspecific recent stressors are related to electronic nicotine product use among young adults.\nDespite increases in electronic nicotine product use among adults, stressors shaping the use\nof these products remain largely unknown. The current study examined the types and average severity of stressors endorsed between young adults with past 30-day electronic nicotine product use and young adults with no lifetime use, as well as the association between\nfrequency of recent electronic nicotine product use and average severity of stressors.\n\n\n\n175 current electronic nicotine product users and 333 lifetime abstainers of electronic nicotine products and cigarettes reported recent stressful experiences that occurred\nin the past six months, as well as lifetime and past 30-day substance use. Chi-square, independent samples t-test, and regression analyses were performed.\n\n\n\nThere were no significant group differences in the primary type of stressor experienced (p = 0.320) or average stress of the three recent stressful experiences reported (p =\n0.246). There was no significant relationship between electronic nicotine product use and\naverage stress of the three recent stressful experiences, controlling for demographic and\nsubstance use covariates (p = 0.150). Both current electronic nicotine product users and\nlifetime abstainers endorsed school, family, and romantic relationship stressors most frequently as their top stressors.\n\n\n\nTo our knowledge, this is the first study to examine group differences in specific stressor categories and perceived stress between current electronic nicotine product\nusers and lifetime abstainers of these products. Given the novel assessment of stressor\ntypes, the current study provides a critical starting point for research on this timely topic.\nIn addition, due to the high overlap between stress and nicotine use, future studies should\ninvestigate different populations of electronic nicotine product users and other methods to\nassess stressful experiences.\n","PeriodicalId":36711,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126660822288158240228094043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine how specific recent stressors are related to electronic nicotine product use among young adults. Despite increases in electronic nicotine product use among adults, stressors shaping the use of these products remain largely unknown. The current study examined the types and average severity of stressors endorsed between young adults with past 30-day electronic nicotine product use and young adults with no lifetime use, as well as the association between frequency of recent electronic nicotine product use and average severity of stressors. 175 current electronic nicotine product users and 333 lifetime abstainers of electronic nicotine products and cigarettes reported recent stressful experiences that occurred in the past six months, as well as lifetime and past 30-day substance use. Chi-square, independent samples t-test, and regression analyses were performed. There were no significant group differences in the primary type of stressor experienced (p = 0.320) or average stress of the three recent stressful experiences reported (p = 0.246). There was no significant relationship between electronic nicotine product use and average stress of the three recent stressful experiences, controlling for demographic and substance use covariates (p = 0.150). Both current electronic nicotine product users and lifetime abstainers endorsed school, family, and romantic relationship stressors most frequently as their top stressors. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine group differences in specific stressor categories and perceived stress between current electronic nicotine product users and lifetime abstainers of these products. Given the novel assessment of stressor types, the current study provides a critical starting point for research on this timely topic. In addition, due to the high overlap between stress and nicotine use, future studies should investigate different populations of electronic nicotine product users and other methods to assess stressful experiences.
最近的压力经历与年轻人使用电子尼古丁产品的情况
尽管电子尼古丁产品的使用在成年人中有所增加,但影响这些产品使用的压力因素在很大程度上仍不为人所知。本研究调查了过去 30 天使用过电子尼古丁产品的年轻成年人和终生未使用过电子尼古丁产品的年轻成年人所认可的压力源类型和平均严重程度,以及近期使用电子尼古丁产品的频率与压力源平均严重程度之间的关系。175 名目前使用电子尼古丁产品的人和 333 名终生不使用电子尼古丁产品和香烟的人报告了过去六个月中发生的近期压力经历,以及终生和过去 30 天的药物使用情况。在所经历的主要压力类型(p = 0.320)或所报告的最近三次压力经历的平均压力(p = 0.246)方面,没有明显的群体差异。电子尼古丁产品的使用与最近三次压力经历的平均压力之间没有明显关系,控制了人口统计学和物质使用协变量(p = 0.150)。据我们所知,这是第一项研究,考察了电子尼古丁产品使用者和终生禁用者在特定压力类别和感知压力方面的群体差异。此外,由于压力和尼古丁使用之间存在高度重叠,未来的研究应该调查不同的电子尼古丁产品使用者群体,并采用其他方法来评估压力体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews
Current Psychiatry Research and Reviews Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信