Gastrointestinal tolerability of organic infant formula compared to traditional ‎infant formula: A systematic review

Mohammed Al-Beltagi, N. Saeed, A. Bediwy, Reem Elbeltagi, Mohamed Basiony Hamza‎
{"title":"Gastrointestinal tolerability of organic infant formula compared to traditional ‎infant formula: A systematic review","authors":"Mohammed Al-Beltagi, N. Saeed, A. Bediwy, Reem Elbeltagi, Mohamed Basiony Hamza‎","doi":"10.5409/wjcp.v13.i1.88783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Infants' nutrition significantly influences their growth, development, and overall well-being. With the increasing demand for organic infant formula driven by the perception of health benefits and growing awareness of natural feeding options, it is crucial to conduct a comparative analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability between organic and traditional infant formulas.\n AIM\n To provide a concise and precise analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic infant formula compared to traditional infant formula. Due to limited direct comparisons, the review synthesizes available literature on each formula type, presenting insights into their potential effects on infants' digestive health.\n METHODS\n An extensive literature search was conducted, compiling studies on organic and traditional infant formulas, their compositions, and reported effects on gastrointestinal tolerability. We searched academic databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar and specialized ‎nutrition, paediatrics, and infant health journals using relevant keywords till October 1, 2023. ‎\n RESULTS\n Although specific comparative studies are scarce and formula heterogeneity is a significant limitation, this systematic review provides an in-depth understanding of organic infant formulas' composition and potential benefits. While scientific evidence directly comparing gastrointestinal tolerability is limited, organic formulas strive to use carefully selected organic ingredients to imitate breast milk composition. Potential benefits include improved lipid profiles, higher methionine content, and decreased antibiotic-resistant bacteria levels. Understanding the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic and traditional infant formulas is crucial for parents and healthcare providers to make informed decisions.\n CONCLUSION\n Despite limitations in direct comparisons, this systematic review provides insights into the composition and potential benefits of organic infant formulas. It emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate their gastrointestinal effects comprehensively.","PeriodicalId":75338,"journal":{"name":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","volume":"232 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of clinical pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v13.i1.88783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Infants' nutrition significantly influences their growth, development, and overall well-being. With the increasing demand for organic infant formula driven by the perception of health benefits and growing awareness of natural feeding options, it is crucial to conduct a comparative analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability between organic and traditional infant formulas. AIM To provide a concise and precise analysis of the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic infant formula compared to traditional infant formula. Due to limited direct comparisons, the review synthesizes available literature on each formula type, presenting insights into their potential effects on infants' digestive health. METHODS An extensive literature search was conducted, compiling studies on organic and traditional infant formulas, their compositions, and reported effects on gastrointestinal tolerability. We searched academic databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar and specialized ‎nutrition, paediatrics, and infant health journals using relevant keywords till October 1, 2023. ‎ RESULTS Although specific comparative studies are scarce and formula heterogeneity is a significant limitation, this systematic review provides an in-depth understanding of organic infant formulas' composition and potential benefits. While scientific evidence directly comparing gastrointestinal tolerability is limited, organic formulas strive to use carefully selected organic ingredients to imitate breast milk composition. Potential benefits include improved lipid profiles, higher methionine content, and decreased antibiotic-resistant bacteria levels. Understanding the gastrointestinal tolerability of organic and traditional infant formulas is crucial for parents and healthcare providers to make informed decisions. CONCLUSION Despite limitations in direct comparisons, this systematic review provides insights into the composition and potential benefits of organic infant formulas. It emphasizes the need for further research to elucidate their gastrointestinal effects comprehensively.
有机婴儿配方奶粉与传统婴儿配方奶粉的胃肠道耐受性比较:系统综述
背景婴儿的营养对其生长、发育和整体健康有着重要影响。随着人们对有机婴儿配方奶粉健康益处的认识以及对天然喂养选择的日益增长的意识,对有机婴儿配方奶粉和传统婴儿配方奶粉的胃肠道耐受性进行比较分析至关重要。目的 对有机婴儿配方奶粉与传统婴儿配方奶粉的胃肠道耐受性进行简明、准确的分析。由于直接比较有限,本综述综合了有关每种配方奶粉的现有文献,深入分析了它们对婴儿消化系统健康的潜在影响。方法 我们进行了广泛的文献检索,汇编了有关有机和传统婴儿配方奶粉、其成分以及对胃肠道耐受性影响的研究报告。截至 2023 年 10 月 1 日,我们使用相关关键词检索了 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 等学术数据库以及营养学、儿科学和婴幼儿健康专业期刊。结果 虽然具体的比较研究很少,配方的异质性也是一个重要的限制因素,但本系统综述提供了对有机婴儿配方奶粉成分和潜在益处的深入了解。虽然直接比较胃肠道耐受性的科学证据有限,但有机配方奶粉努力使用精心挑选的有机成分来模仿母乳成分。其潜在益处包括改善脂质概况、提高蛋氨酸含量和降低抗生素耐药菌水平。了解有机配方奶粉和传统婴儿配方奶粉的胃肠道耐受性对于父母和医疗保健提供者做出明智的决定至关重要。结论 尽管在直接比较方面存在局限性,但本系统综述提供了有关有机婴儿配方奶粉成分和潜在益处的见解。它强调了进一步研究以全面阐明其胃肠道影响的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信