Impact of Haptic Feedback in High Latency Teleoperation for Space Applications

Joe Louca, Kerstin Eder, J. Vrublevskis, Antonia Tzemanaki
{"title":"Impact of Haptic Feedback in High Latency Teleoperation for Space Applications","authors":"Joe Louca, Kerstin Eder, J. Vrublevskis, Antonia Tzemanaki","doi":"10.1145/3651993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote manipulation is a key enabler for upcoming space activities such as in-orbit servicing and manufacture (IOSM). However, due to the large distances involved, these systems encounter unavoidable signal delays which can lead to poor performance and users adopting a disjointed, ‘move-and-wait’ style of operation. We use a robot arm teleoperated with a haptic controller to test the impact of haptic feedback on delayed (up to 2.6 s: Earth-Moon communications) teleoperation performance for two example IOSM-style tasks.\n This user study showed that increased latency reduced performance in all of metrics recorded. In real-time teleoperation, haptic feedback showed improvements in success rate, accuracy, contact force, velocity, and trust, but, of these, only the improvements to contact forces and moving velocity were also seen at higher latencies. Accuracy and trust improvements were lost, or even reversed, at higher latencies. Results varied between the two tasks, highlighting the need for further research into the range of task types to be encountered in teleoperated space activities. This study also provides a framework by which to explore how features other than haptic feedback can impact both performance and trust in delayed teleoperation.","PeriodicalId":504644,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3651993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote manipulation is a key enabler for upcoming space activities such as in-orbit servicing and manufacture (IOSM). However, due to the large distances involved, these systems encounter unavoidable signal delays which can lead to poor performance and users adopting a disjointed, ‘move-and-wait’ style of operation. We use a robot arm teleoperated with a haptic controller to test the impact of haptic feedback on delayed (up to 2.6 s: Earth-Moon communications) teleoperation performance for two example IOSM-style tasks. This user study showed that increased latency reduced performance in all of metrics recorded. In real-time teleoperation, haptic feedback showed improvements in success rate, accuracy, contact force, velocity, and trust, but, of these, only the improvements to contact forces and moving velocity were also seen at higher latencies. Accuracy and trust improvements were lost, or even reversed, at higher latencies. Results varied between the two tasks, highlighting the need for further research into the range of task types to be encountered in teleoperated space activities. This study also provides a framework by which to explore how features other than haptic feedback can impact both performance and trust in delayed teleoperation.
触觉反馈在空间应用高延迟远程操作中的影响
远程操纵是即将开展的空间活动(如在轨服务和制造(IOSM))的关键推动因素。然而,由于涉及的距离较远,这些系统会遇到不可避免的信号延迟,从而导致系统性能不佳,用户也会采用脱节的 "移动-等待 "式操作。我们在两个 IOSM 类型的任务示例中,使用带有触觉控制器的机械臂远程操作,测试触觉反馈对延迟(长达 2.6 秒:地月通信)远程操作性能的影响。这项用户研究表明,延迟的增加降低了所有记录指标的性能。在实时远程操作中,触觉反馈在成功率、准确性、接触力、速度和信任度方面都有所改善,但其中只有接触力和移动速度的改善在更高的延迟时间内也能看到。准确率和信任度的提高在更高的延迟时间内消失,甚至出现逆转。两项任务的结果各不相同,这说明有必要进一步研究远程操作空间活动中可能遇到的各种任务类型。这项研究还提供了一个框架,用于探索触觉反馈以外的其他特征如何影响延迟远程操作的性能和信任度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信