The Effects of Goal-setting on Learning Outcomes and Self-Regulated Learning Processes

Kelsey Urgo, Jaime Arguello
{"title":"The Effects of Goal-setting on Learning Outcomes and Self-Regulated Learning Processes","authors":"Kelsey Urgo, Jaime Arguello","doi":"10.1145/3627508.3638348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a user study ( 𝑁 = 40) that investigated the role of goal-setting on learning during search. To this end, we developed a tool called the Subgoal Manager (SM). The SM was designed to help searchers break apart a learning-oriented search task into smaller subgoals. The tool enabled participants to add, delete, and modify subgoals; take notes with respect to subgoals; and mark subgoals as completed. During the study, participants completed a single learning-oriented search task and were assigned to one of two sub-goal conditions. In the Subgoals condition, participants had access to the SM; were instructed to develop at least three subgoals before the search session; and could add, delete, and modify subgoals during the search session. In the NoSubgoals condition, participants were not instructed to set subgoals and were simply provided with a text editor to take notes. We investigate the effects of the subgoal condition on: ( RQ1 ) learning and retention and ( RQ2 ) the extent to which participants engaged in specific self-regulated learning (SRL) processes during the search session. Our results found two important trends. First, participants in the Subgoals condition had better learning outcomes, especially with respect to retention. Second, based on a qualitative analysis of participants’ search sessions, participants in the Subgoals condition engaged in more self-regulated learning (SRL) processes. Combined, our results suggest that goal-setting improves learning during search by encouraging and supporting greater engagement with SRL processes.","PeriodicalId":220434,"journal":{"name":"Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"53 7","pages":"278-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3627508.3638348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a user study ( 𝑁 = 40) that investigated the role of goal-setting on learning during search. To this end, we developed a tool called the Subgoal Manager (SM). The SM was designed to help searchers break apart a learning-oriented search task into smaller subgoals. The tool enabled participants to add, delete, and modify subgoals; take notes with respect to subgoals; and mark subgoals as completed. During the study, participants completed a single learning-oriented search task and were assigned to one of two sub-goal conditions. In the Subgoals condition, participants had access to the SM; were instructed to develop at least three subgoals before the search session; and could add, delete, and modify subgoals during the search session. In the NoSubgoals condition, participants were not instructed to set subgoals and were simply provided with a text editor to take notes. We investigate the effects of the subgoal condition on: ( RQ1 ) learning and retention and ( RQ2 ) the extent to which participants engaged in specific self-regulated learning (SRL) processes during the search session. Our results found two important trends. First, participants in the Subgoals condition had better learning outcomes, especially with respect to retention. Second, based on a qualitative analysis of participants’ search sessions, participants in the Subgoals condition engaged in more self-regulated learning (SRL) processes. Combined, our results suggest that goal-setting improves learning during search by encouraging and supporting greater engagement with SRL processes.
目标设定对学习成果和自我调节学习过程的影响
我们介绍了一项用户研究(𝑁 = 40),该研究调查了目标设定在搜索过程中对学习的作用。为此,我们开发了一个名为 "子目标管理器"(Subgoal Manager,SM)的工具。子目标管理器旨在帮助搜索者将以学习为导向的搜索任务分解成更小的子目标。通过该工具,参与者可以添加、删除和修改子目标;对子目标进行记录;并将子目标标记为已完成。在研究过程中,参与者完成一项以学习为导向的搜索任务,并被分配到两个子目标条件之一。在 "子目标 "条件下,被试可以使用 SM;被要求在搜索前制定至少三个子目标;在搜索过程中可以添加、删除和修改子目标。在 "无子目标 "条件下,参与者不需要接受设定子目标的指导,他们只需使用文本编辑器做笔记。我们将研究子目标条件对以下方面的影响:(问题 1)学习和保持,以及(问题 2)参与者在搜索过程中参与特定自我调节学习(SRL)过程的程度。我们的结果发现了两个重要趋势。首先,"子目标 "条件下的参与者学习效果更好,尤其是在保持率方面。其次,根据对参与者搜索过程的定性分析,子目标条件下的参与者参与了更多的自我调节学习(SRL)过程。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,通过鼓励和支持参与者更多地参与自律学习过程,目标设定可以改善搜索过程中的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信