Comparative study of costs of belts and trucks for the transportation of mineral in surface mining [Estudio comparativo de costos de fajas y camiones para el transporte de mineral en minera superficial]

Alex Erik Fernandez Vasquez, Jherson Edwing Rodriguez Julca, Erica Edith Gomez Vasquez
{"title":"Comparative study of costs of belts and trucks for the transportation of mineral in surface mining [Estudio comparativo de costos de fajas y camiones para el transporte de mineral en minera superficial]","authors":"Alex Erik Fernandez Vasquez, Jherson Edwing Rodriguez Julca, Erica Edith Gomez Vasquez","doi":"10.32829/sej.v8i1.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on making a detailed description of the unit costs associated with the transportation of minerals in mining operations. The hypothesis proposed suggests that, when carrying out an economic evaluation, conveyor belts exhibit a lower present value compared to the use of trucks. The research is characterized by being applied, non-experimental and descriptive. The conclusion drawn indicates that, when contrasting these two options through an economic analysis, the conveyor belt has a reduced present value of 119 million dollars, which represents an advantage over trucks that have a present value of 164 million dollars. reflecting a difference of 39% indicating that the conveyor belt is positioned as the most beneficial option for its construction. To carry out this project, it would be necessary to have 13 trucks, as well as a stacker, a front loader and a material crusher. In contrast, an option to use trucks would require a quantity of 22 units, with a demand of 50% in present value terms compared to the conveyor belt approach.","PeriodicalId":512166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sciences and Engineering","volume":"56 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32829/sej.v8i1.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on making a detailed description of the unit costs associated with the transportation of minerals in mining operations. The hypothesis proposed suggests that, when carrying out an economic evaluation, conveyor belts exhibit a lower present value compared to the use of trucks. The research is characterized by being applied, non-experimental and descriptive. The conclusion drawn indicates that, when contrasting these two options through an economic analysis, the conveyor belt has a reduced present value of 119 million dollars, which represents an advantage over trucks that have a present value of 164 million dollars. reflecting a difference of 39% indicating that the conveyor belt is positioned as the most beneficial option for its construction. To carry out this project, it would be necessary to have 13 trucks, as well as a stacker, a front loader and a material crusher. In contrast, an option to use trucks would require a quantity of 22 units, with a demand of 50% in present value terms compared to the conveyor belt approach.
表层采矿中运输矿物的皮带和卡车成本比较研究
本研究的重点是详细描述采矿作业中与矿物运输相关的单位成本。提出的假设表明,在进行经济评估时,与使用卡车相比,传送带的现值较低。这项研究的特点是应用性、非实验性和描述性。得出的结论表明,在通过经济分析对这两种方案进行对比时,传送带的现值减少了 1.19 亿美元,比现值为 1.64 亿美元的卡车更具优势,两者相差 39%,表明传送带被定位为最有利的施工方案。要实施该项目,需要 13 辆卡车、一台堆垛机、一台前端装载机和一台材料破碎机。相比之下,如果选择使用卡车,则需要 22 辆卡车,按现值计算,需求量比输送带方式减少 50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信