Silencing Voices: Indigenous day schools and the education section of the 1958 Hawthorn report for British Columbia

Pub Date : 2024-03-11 DOI:10.3828/bjcs.2024.2
Emilie Jones, Veronika Larsen, Stefan Dollinger
{"title":"Silencing Voices: Indigenous day schools and the education section of the 1958 Hawthorn report for British Columbia","authors":"Emilie Jones, Veronika Larsen, Stefan Dollinger","doi":"10.3828/bjcs.2024.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In 1954, the Department of Citizenship and Immigration commissioned anthropologist Harry Hawthorn to investigate problems faced by Indigenous people in British Columbia. This article focuses on Hawthorn’s report,\n The Indians of British Columbia\n (1958) and compares its recommendations with the original source questionnaire responses found at the University of British Columbia’s Archives and Special Collections. The responses examined, collected near the peak of day school enrollment in British Columbia, offer new insights directly from educators about their perspectives on the problems faced by Indigenous children attending day schools, and more broadly Indigenous communities as a whole. Key changes apparent in the questionnaire responses and 1958 report showcase the absence of Indigenous voices in any of the questionnaires and a lack of interest from educators in the communities, though such interest is claimed in the report. Both the questionnaires and Hawthorn’s resulting report recommend a consistent antithetical juxtaposition of Indigenous versus western, the discouragement of family ties, and the limitation of formal education to school-aged children. Such findings work to balance Hawthorn’s status as an advocate of Indigenous rights with the damaging realities indicated through and supported by his report. Through this analysis, we aim to further understandings of the impact of day schools on communities in British Columbia, and to view kinship within a reality of resilience and survival.\n","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/bjcs.2024.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1954, the Department of Citizenship and Immigration commissioned anthropologist Harry Hawthorn to investigate problems faced by Indigenous people in British Columbia. This article focuses on Hawthorn’s report, The Indians of British Columbia (1958) and compares its recommendations with the original source questionnaire responses found at the University of British Columbia’s Archives and Special Collections. The responses examined, collected near the peak of day school enrollment in British Columbia, offer new insights directly from educators about their perspectives on the problems faced by Indigenous children attending day schools, and more broadly Indigenous communities as a whole. Key changes apparent in the questionnaire responses and 1958 report showcase the absence of Indigenous voices in any of the questionnaires and a lack of interest from educators in the communities, though such interest is claimed in the report. Both the questionnaires and Hawthorn’s resulting report recommend a consistent antithetical juxtaposition of Indigenous versus western, the discouragement of family ties, and the limitation of formal education to school-aged children. Such findings work to balance Hawthorn’s status as an advocate of Indigenous rights with the damaging realities indicated through and supported by his report. Through this analysis, we aim to further understandings of the impact of day schools on communities in British Columbia, and to view kinship within a reality of resilience and survival.
分享
查看原文
压制声音:土著日校与 1958 年不列颠哥伦比亚省山楂树报告中的教育部分
1954 年,公民与移民部委托人类学家哈里-霍索恩 (Harry Hawthorn) 调查不列颠哥伦比亚省土著居民面临的问题。本文重点介绍霍索恩的报告《不列颠哥伦比亚省的印第安人》(1958 年),并将报告中的建议与不列颠哥伦比亚大学档案与特别收藏馆中的原始问卷答复进行比较。所研究的问卷是在不列颠哥伦比亚省走读学校入学高峰期附近收集的,这些问卷直接从教育工作者的视角出发,对走读学校的土著儿童以及更广泛意义上的整个土著社区所面临的问题提出了新的见解。问卷答复和 1958 年报告中明显的主要变化表明,任何问卷中都没有土著人的声音,社区中的教育工作者也缺乏兴趣,尽管报告中声称他们有兴趣。调查问卷和霍桑的报告都建议将土著人与西方人对立起来,不鼓励家庭关系,并将正规教育局限于学龄儿童。这些发现有助于平衡霍桑作为土著权利倡导者的身份与他的报告所指出和支持的破坏性现实之间的关系。通过这一分析,我们旨在进一步了解日校对不列颠哥伦比亚省社区的影响,并在复原和生存的现实中看待亲情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信