A Comparative Cohort Study of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for the Treatment of Iranian Endometrial Cancer Patients

IF 0.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Sahar Khoshravesh, Malieheh Arab, Nasim Nouri, B. Nouri, Zanbagh Pirastehfar, B. Ghavami
{"title":"A Comparative Cohort Study of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy for the Treatment of Iranian Endometrial Cancer Patients","authors":"Sahar Khoshravesh, Malieheh Arab, Nasim Nouri, B. Nouri, Zanbagh Pirastehfar, B. Ghavami","doi":"10.5812/ijcm-141894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In recent decades, laparoscopy and robotic surgery are mostly used for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Laparoscopic surgery's popularity has grown due to rapid postoperative recovery and reduced post-surgical morbidity and complications compared with open surgery. Objectives: This study aimed to compare laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in terms of their advantages and disadvantages for treating early-stage endometrial cancer in a population of Iranian patients in a referral center of gyneco-oncology. Methods: In this cohort study at Imam Hossein Medical Center in Tehran, Iran, from 2019 to 2022, early-stage endometrial cancer patients were included. Advanced disease, patients with medical comorbidity not suitable for laparoscopy, previous surgery for endometrial cancer, and prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for treatment of the endometrial cancer were excluded from the study. The study compared two groups regarding operative findings, including FIGO stage, grade, postoperative complications, and hospitalization days. Results: The study included 17 patients in the laparoscopic group with a mean age of 56(+ 12.5) years old and 44 patients in the laparotomy group with a mean age of 57(+ 10.2) years old. Two groups were well-matched in terms of body mass index and menopausal status. The median intraoperative blood loss was significantly in terms of statistical less in the laparoscopic group (200 ml versus 500 ml, P = 0.001). Four (23.5%) patients in the laparoscopic group needed intraoperative blood transfusion versus 22 (50.0%) in the laparotomy group, P = 0.061. Hospital stay days were shorter in the laparoscopic group, with a median of three versus six days (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, the minimally invasive operation caused less blood loss, hospital stay, and blood transfusion in comparison to laparotomy in Iranian endometrial cancer patients, confirming the preferred method of laparoscopy in these patients.","PeriodicalId":44764,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm-141894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent decades, laparoscopy and robotic surgery are mostly used for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Laparoscopic surgery's popularity has grown due to rapid postoperative recovery and reduced post-surgical morbidity and complications compared with open surgery. Objectives: This study aimed to compare laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in terms of their advantages and disadvantages for treating early-stage endometrial cancer in a population of Iranian patients in a referral center of gyneco-oncology. Methods: In this cohort study at Imam Hossein Medical Center in Tehran, Iran, from 2019 to 2022, early-stage endometrial cancer patients were included. Advanced disease, patients with medical comorbidity not suitable for laparoscopy, previous surgery for endometrial cancer, and prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for treatment of the endometrial cancer were excluded from the study. The study compared two groups regarding operative findings, including FIGO stage, grade, postoperative complications, and hospitalization days. Results: The study included 17 patients in the laparoscopic group with a mean age of 56(+ 12.5) years old and 44 patients in the laparotomy group with a mean age of 57(+ 10.2) years old. Two groups were well-matched in terms of body mass index and menopausal status. The median intraoperative blood loss was significantly in terms of statistical less in the laparoscopic group (200 ml versus 500 ml, P = 0.001). Four (23.5%) patients in the laparoscopic group needed intraoperative blood transfusion versus 22 (50.0%) in the laparotomy group, P = 0.061. Hospital stay days were shorter in the laparoscopic group, with a median of three versus six days (P < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, the minimally invasive operation caused less blood loss, hospital stay, and blood transfusion in comparison to laparotomy in Iranian endometrial cancer patients, confirming the preferred method of laparoscopy in these patients.
治疗伊朗子宫内膜癌患者的腹腔镜手术与开腹手术队列比较研究
背景:近几十年来,腹腔镜手术和机器人手术主要用于治疗子宫内膜癌。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜手术术后恢复快,术后发病率和并发症少,因此越来越受欢迎。研究目的本研究旨在比较腹腔镜手术和开腹手术在治疗早期子宫内膜癌方面的优缺点,研究对象为一家妇科肿瘤转诊中心的伊朗患者。研究方法这项队列研究于 2019 年至 2022 年在伊朗德黑兰伊玛目侯赛因医疗中心进行,纳入了早期子宫内膜癌患者。研究排除了晚期疾病、患有不适合腹腔镜手术的合并症、曾接受过子宫内膜癌手术、曾接受过化疗或放疗治疗子宫内膜癌的患者。研究比较了两组患者的手术结果,包括 FIGO 分期、分级、术后并发症和住院天数。研究结果腹腔镜组有 17 名患者,平均年龄为 56(+ 12.5)岁;开腹手术组有 44 名患者,平均年龄为 57(+ 10.2)岁。两组患者的体重指数和绝经状态完全匹配。据统计,腹腔镜组的术中出血量明显较少(200 毫升对 500 毫升,P = 0.001)。腹腔镜组有4名患者(23.5%)需要术中输血,而开腹手术组有22名患者(50.0%)需要输血,P = 0.061。腹腔镜组的住院天数较短,中位数为 3 天,而开腹手术组为 6 天(P < 0.001)。结论:总之,与开腹手术相比,微创手术对伊朗子宫内膜癌患者造成的失血量、住院时间和输血量更少,证实了腹腔镜手术是这些患者的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: International Journal of Cancer Management (IJCM) publishes peer-reviewed original studies and reviews on cancer etiology, epidemiology and risk factors, novel approach to cancer management including prevention, diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and issues regarding cancer survivorship and palliative care. The scope spans the spectrum of cancer research from the laboratory to the clinic, with special emphasis on translational cancer research that bridge the laboratory and clinic. We also consider original case reports that expand clinical cancer knowledge and convey important best practice messages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信