Combined Efficacy of Advanced Oral Hygiene 
Aids and Active Reminders in Maintaining 
the Oral Hygiene of Patients with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized 
Clinical Trial

Shalini Rathore, Zarina Bali, Vikas Sehgal, Rajiv Gupta
{"title":"Combined Efficacy of Advanced Oral Hygiene \u2028Aids and Active Reminders in Maintaining \u2028the Oral Hygiene of Patients with Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Randomized \u2028Clinical Trial","authors":"Shalini Rathore, Zarina Bali, Vikas Sehgal, Rajiv Gupta","doi":"10.1177/03015742241234428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of water irrigating devices, powered toothbrushes, and active repeated oral hygiene reminders on oral hygiene of fixed orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind clinical trial involving fixed orthodontic appliance patients. Patients were recruited within six months of bonding on both the arches. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to four groups; groups 1 and 3 subjects received standard oral hygiene procedures and used manual orthodontic toothbrushes, and subjects in groups 2 and 4 used powered toothbrushes and water irrigators for oral hygiene maintenance during the study period. In addition, repeated oral hygiene reminders via SMS were sent to subjects in groups 1 and 2, whereas groups 3 and 4 subjects received only oral motivation. The principal investigator assessed the plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) at baseline (T0) and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, that is, T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Results: Group 2 and group 4 subjects showed statistically significant reduction in PI ( p < .001) and GI ( p < .001) scores at the end of study interval; however, the magnitude of decrease was less in group 4 in comparison to group 2. Intergroup comparisons between group 1 versus group 3 and group 2 versus group 4 were made to evaluate the efficacy of reminders. Statistically significant reduction was observed in group 2 as compared to group 4 at T4 ( p < .001) when compared to T1 ( p < .87). Conclusion: Using powered toothbrushes and oral irrigators resulted in a statistically more significant reduction in plaque and gingivitis scores than conventional procedures. Active reminders had a catalytic effect in improving the oral hygiene.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742241234428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of water irrigating devices, powered toothbrushes, and active repeated oral hygiene reminders on oral hygiene of fixed orthodontic patients. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind clinical trial involving fixed orthodontic appliance patients. Patients were recruited within six months of bonding on both the arches. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to four groups; groups 1 and 3 subjects received standard oral hygiene procedures and used manual orthodontic toothbrushes, and subjects in groups 2 and 4 used powered toothbrushes and water irrigators for oral hygiene maintenance during the study period. In addition, repeated oral hygiene reminders via SMS were sent to subjects in groups 1 and 2, whereas groups 3 and 4 subjects received only oral motivation. The principal investigator assessed the plaque index (PI) and gingival index (GI) at baseline (T0) and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, that is, T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Results: Group 2 and group 4 subjects showed statistically significant reduction in PI ( p < .001) and GI ( p < .001) scores at the end of study interval; however, the magnitude of decrease was less in group 4 in comparison to group 2. Intergroup comparisons between group 1 versus group 3 and group 2 versus group 4 were made to evaluate the efficacy of reminders. Statistically significant reduction was observed in group 2 as compared to group 4 at T4 ( p < .001) when compared to T1 ( p < .87). Conclusion: Using powered toothbrushes and oral irrigators resulted in a statistically more significant reduction in plaque and gingivitis scores than conventional procedures. Active reminders had a catalytic effect in improving the oral hygiene.
高级口腔卫生辅助工具和主动提醒在保持固定正畸矫治器患者口腔卫生方面的综合功效:随机临床试验
目的评估水冲洗装置、电动牙刷和主动重复口腔卫生提醒对固定正畸患者口腔卫生的影响。材料与方法这是一项随机、考官盲法临床试验,涉及固定矫治器患者。患者在两个牙弓粘结后六个月内被招募。80 名患者被随机分配到四组;第一组和第三组受试者接受标准口腔卫生程序并使用手动正畸牙刷,第二组和第四组受试者在研究期间使用电动牙刷和水冲洗器进行口腔卫生维护。此外,研究人员还通过短信向第 1 组和第 2 组受试者反复发送口腔卫生提醒信息,而第 3 组和第 4 组受试者只接受口腔激励。主要研究人员分别在基线(T0)和 2、4、8 和 12 周后(即 T1、T2、T3 和 T4)评估牙菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈指数(GI)。结果第 2 组和第 4 组受试者的 PI(P < .001)和 GI(P < .001)评分在研究间隔结束时均有统计学意义上的显著下降;但与第 2 组相比,第 4 组的下降幅度较小。与 T1(P < .87)相比,在 T4(P < .001),观察到第 2 组与第 4 组的数据明显减少。结论与传统方法相比,使用电动牙刷和口腔冲洗器能显著降低牙菌斑和牙龈炎评分。主动提醒对改善口腔卫生有促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信