Building the status of teaching-focused positions as prestigious roles to improve teaching quality

Birgit Loch, D. Horey, Brianna Julien, Christopher Bridge, Belinda Thompson
{"title":"Building the status of teaching-focused positions as prestigious roles to improve teaching quality","authors":"Birgit Loch, D. Horey, Brianna Julien, Christopher Bridge, Belinda Thompson","doi":"10.59197/asrhe.v5i1.8145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teaching-focused roles provide an ideal opportunity to improve the quality of teaching in higher education. However, such roles are commonly presented as pragmatic solutions for academics not fulfilling research expectations rather than quality improvement interventions. Workload allocations can be shifted to ensure that unproductive researchers are not counted as research-active in university ranking assessments and, at the same time, help balance salary budgets. These measures to address underperforming researchers have shifted focus from the potential to improve teaching quality that teaching-focused roles promised. We argue that a successful implementation of a supported approach for teaching-focused academics can help to foster a culture of excellence in teaching that should deliver career development and associated benefits for those in teaching-focused roles. This paper discusses a considered approach to improving teaching in higher education by supporting teaching-focused roles in an Australian university. Strategies to raise the profile of teaching-focused academics included a high-level champion, a merit-based application process, and a development program. These strategies aimed to address mis-focused perceptions and stigma related to teaching-focused positions and contribute to a culture of excellence in teaching. We put this approach forward as a model for institutions wanting to improve teaching quality, implement or enhance teaching-focused career paths or review existing models.","PeriodicalId":470188,"journal":{"name":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","volume":"100 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59197/asrhe.v5i1.8145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teaching-focused roles provide an ideal opportunity to improve the quality of teaching in higher education. However, such roles are commonly presented as pragmatic solutions for academics not fulfilling research expectations rather than quality improvement interventions. Workload allocations can be shifted to ensure that unproductive researchers are not counted as research-active in university ranking assessments and, at the same time, help balance salary budgets. These measures to address underperforming researchers have shifted focus from the potential to improve teaching quality that teaching-focused roles promised. We argue that a successful implementation of a supported approach for teaching-focused academics can help to foster a culture of excellence in teaching that should deliver career development and associated benefits for those in teaching-focused roles. This paper discusses a considered approach to improving teaching in higher education by supporting teaching-focused roles in an Australian university. Strategies to raise the profile of teaching-focused academics included a high-level champion, a merit-based application process, and a development program. These strategies aimed to address mis-focused perceptions and stigma related to teaching-focused positions and contribute to a culture of excellence in teaching. We put this approach forward as a model for institutions wanting to improve teaching quality, implement or enhance teaching-focused career paths or review existing models.
提高以教学为重点的职位的地位,使其成为有声望的职位,从而提高教学质量
以教学为中心的角色为提高高等教育的教学质量提供了一个理想的机会。然而,这种角色通常被视为学术界未达到研究预期的实用解决方案,而不是提高质量的干预措施。可以转移工作量分配,以确保在大学排名评估中不把没有成果的研究人员算作研究活跃人员,同时帮助平衡工资预算。这些针对表现不佳的研究人员的措施,转移了人们对以教学为中心的角色所承诺的提高教学质量潜力的关注。我们认为,针对以教学为中心的学者成功实施一种支持性方法,有助于培养一种卓越的教学文化,从而为那些以教学为中心的学者带来职业发展和相关利益。本文讨论了澳大利亚一所大学通过支持以教学为中心的角色来改进高等教育教学的一种经过深思熟虑的方法。提升以教学为重点的学者形象的策略包括:高层领导、择优申请程序和发展计划。这些策略旨在解决与教学型职位相关的误解和污名化问题,并促进卓越教学文化的形成。我们将这种方法作为一种模式,供希望提高教学质量、实施或加强以教学为重点的职业发展途径或审查现有模式的院校借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信