Digital health interventions for suicide prevention among LGBTQ: A narrative review

Kiran Paudel, Kamal Gautam, Prashamsa Bhandari, Sangam Shah, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Bibhav Acharya, S. Sapkota, Samir Kumar Adhikari, P. Baral, Archana Shrestha, Roman Shrestha
{"title":"Digital health interventions for suicide prevention among LGBTQ: A narrative review","authors":"Kiran Paudel, Kamal Gautam, Prashamsa Bhandari, Sangam Shah, Jeffrey A Wickersham, Bibhav Acharya, S. Sapkota, Samir Kumar Adhikari, P. Baral, Archana Shrestha, Roman Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/hprospect.v23i1.62795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are prevalent within the LGBTQ community, often exacerbated by challenges in accessing care and the perceived stigma and discrimination tied to disclosing one's identity. Digital health interventions that offer psychosocial self-help present a promising platform to reach individuals at risk of STB, especially those who may not engage with conventional health services. This review aimed to assess the role of digital-based intervention in reducing STBs among LGBTQ individuals.\nMethods: We conducted a systematic literature search from three databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINHAL, from 1st Jan 1990 to 31st December 2023. The review encompassed studies investigating the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of digital interventions on STBs, employing randomized control trials (RCTs), pseudo-RCTs, observational pre-posttest designs, and qualitative studies. Potential bias was evaluated using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).\nResults: Five non-overlapping studies were included, reporting data from 777 participants. The studies featured diverse types of digital interventions, including videos, online writing, and mobile applications. The studies included three RCTs, and two qualitative studies. Across most of these studies, notable enhancements or reductions in the proportion of participants reporting STBs were observed post-intervention, alongside improvements in help-seeking intentions. The findings underscored that the applications used in the studies were engaging, acceptable, and deemed feasible in effectively addressing suicide prevention among the LGBTQ community.\nConclusion: Overall, digital interventions were found to be feasible and acceptable in suicide prevention among LGBTQ communities, demonstrating preliminary efficacy in increasing help-seeking behavior when experiencing suicidal thoughts and in reducing STBs. Therefore, advocating for widespread promotion and dissemination of digital health interventions is crucial, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited access to health services and heightened barriers to obtaining such services.  Further research using fully powered RCT is imperative to assess the efficacy of these interventions.","PeriodicalId":488418,"journal":{"name":"Health prospect","volume":"73 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health prospect","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/hprospect.v23i1.62795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) are prevalent within the LGBTQ community, often exacerbated by challenges in accessing care and the perceived stigma and discrimination tied to disclosing one's identity. Digital health interventions that offer psychosocial self-help present a promising platform to reach individuals at risk of STB, especially those who may not engage with conventional health services. This review aimed to assess the role of digital-based intervention in reducing STBs among LGBTQ individuals. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search from three databases, PsycINFO, PubMed, and CINHAL, from 1st Jan 1990 to 31st December 2023. The review encompassed studies investigating the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of digital interventions on STBs, employing randomized control trials (RCTs), pseudo-RCTs, observational pre-posttest designs, and qualitative studies. Potential bias was evaluated using the McGill Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Five non-overlapping studies were included, reporting data from 777 participants. The studies featured diverse types of digital interventions, including videos, online writing, and mobile applications. The studies included three RCTs, and two qualitative studies. Across most of these studies, notable enhancements or reductions in the proportion of participants reporting STBs were observed post-intervention, alongside improvements in help-seeking intentions. The findings underscored that the applications used in the studies were engaging, acceptable, and deemed feasible in effectively addressing suicide prevention among the LGBTQ community. Conclusion: Overall, digital interventions were found to be feasible and acceptable in suicide prevention among LGBTQ communities, demonstrating preliminary efficacy in increasing help-seeking behavior when experiencing suicidal thoughts and in reducing STBs. Therefore, advocating for widespread promotion and dissemination of digital health interventions is crucial, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with limited access to health services and heightened barriers to obtaining such services.  Further research using fully powered RCT is imperative to assess the efficacy of these interventions.
预防女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者自杀的数字健康干预措施:叙述性综述
背景:自杀想法和行为(STBs)在女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者(LGBTQ)群体中十分普遍,而获得医疗服务方面的挑战以及与披露个人身份相关的耻辱感和歧视往往加剧了这种情况。提供社会心理自助的数字健康干预是一个很有前景的平台,可以帮助有 STB 风险的人,尤其是那些可能不会参与传统健康服务的人。本综述旨在评估基于数字化的干预措施在减少 LGBTQ 个人 STB 方面的作用:我们在 PsycINFO、PubMed 和 CINHAL 三个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间为 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日。综述包括调查数字干预对 STB 的可行性、可接受性和影响的研究,其中采用了随机对照试验 (RCT)、伪 RCT、观察性预试验设计和定性研究。采用麦吉尔混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对潜在的偏差进行了评估:结果:共纳入了五项非重叠研究,报告了 777 名参与者的数据。这些研究采用了不同类型的数字干预方法,包括视频、在线写作和移动应用程序。这些研究包括三项 RCT 研究和两项定性研究。在大多数这些研究中,都观察到干预后报告 STB 的参与者比例明显增加或减少,同时寻求帮助的意愿也有所改善。研究结果表明,这些研究中使用的应用程序具有吸引力、可接受性,并且在有效预防 LGBTQ 群体自杀方面被认为是可行的:总之,研究发现数字干预在 LGBTQ 群体自杀预防中是可行的、可接受的,在增加自杀念头时的求助行为和减少 STB 方面显示出初步的有效性。因此,倡导广泛推广和传播数字健康干预措施至关重要,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMIC),因为这些国家的医疗服务有限,获得此类服务的障碍也更多。 为了评估这些干预措施的效果,必须利用完全有效的 RCT 开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信