Evolution of ride-hailing platforms regulations in India: a multi-level perspective

R. Verma, P. Ilavarasan, A. Kar
{"title":"Evolution of ride-hailing platforms regulations in India: a multi-level perspective","authors":"R. Verma, P. Ilavarasan, A. Kar","doi":"10.1108/dprg-06-2023-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDigital platforms (DP) are transforming service delivery and affecting associated actors. The position of DPs is impacted by the regulations. However, emerging economies often lack the regulatory environment to support DPs. This paper aims to explore the regulatory developments for DPs using the multi-level perspective (MLP).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper explores regulatory developments of ride-hailing platforms (RHPs) in India and their impacts. This study uses qualitative interview data from platform representatives, bureaucrats, drivers, experts and policy documents.\n\n\nFindings\nRegulatory developments in the ride-hailing space cannot be explained as a linear progression. The static institutional assumptions, especially without considering the multi-actors and multi-levels in policy formulation, do not serve associated actors adequately in different times and spaces. The RHPs regulations must consider the perspective of new RHPs and the support available to them. Non-consideration of short- and long-term perspectives of RHPs may have unequal outcomes for established and new RHPs.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research has implications for the digital economy regulatory ecosystem, DPs and implications for policymakers. Though the data from legal documents and qualitative interviews is adequate, transactional data from the RHPs and interviews with judiciary actors would have been insightful.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study provides insights into critical aspects of regulatory evolution, governance and regulatory impact on the DPs’ ecosystem. The right balance of regulations according to the business models of DPs allows DPs to have space for growth and development of the platform ecosystem.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis research shows the interactions in the digital space and how regulations can impact various actors. A balanced policy can guide the paths of DPs to have equal opportunities.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nDP regulations have a complex structure. The paper studies regulatory developments of DPs and the impacts of governance and controls on associated players and platform ecosystems.\n","PeriodicalId":515139,"journal":{"name":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","volume":"100 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-06-2023-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Digital platforms (DP) are transforming service delivery and affecting associated actors. The position of DPs is impacted by the regulations. However, emerging economies often lack the regulatory environment to support DPs. This paper aims to explore the regulatory developments for DPs using the multi-level perspective (MLP). Design/methodology/approach The paper explores regulatory developments of ride-hailing platforms (RHPs) in India and their impacts. This study uses qualitative interview data from platform representatives, bureaucrats, drivers, experts and policy documents. Findings Regulatory developments in the ride-hailing space cannot be explained as a linear progression. The static institutional assumptions, especially without considering the multi-actors and multi-levels in policy formulation, do not serve associated actors adequately in different times and spaces. The RHPs regulations must consider the perspective of new RHPs and the support available to them. Non-consideration of short- and long-term perspectives of RHPs may have unequal outcomes for established and new RHPs. Research limitations/implications This research has implications for the digital economy regulatory ecosystem, DPs and implications for policymakers. Though the data from legal documents and qualitative interviews is adequate, transactional data from the RHPs and interviews with judiciary actors would have been insightful. Practical implications The study provides insights into critical aspects of regulatory evolution, governance and regulatory impact on the DPs’ ecosystem. The right balance of regulations according to the business models of DPs allows DPs to have space for growth and development of the platform ecosystem. Social implications This research shows the interactions in the digital space and how regulations can impact various actors. A balanced policy can guide the paths of DPs to have equal opportunities. Originality/value DP regulations have a complex structure. The paper studies regulatory developments of DPs and the impacts of governance and controls on associated players and platform ecosystems.
印度打车平台法规的演变:多层次视角
目的数字平台(DP)正在改变服务的提供,并影响着相关的参与者。数字平台的地位受到法规的影响。然而,新兴经济体往往缺乏支持数字平台的监管环境。本文旨在利用多层次视角(MLP)探讨网络平台的监管发展。本文探讨了印度打车平台(RHPs)的监管发展及其影响。本研究使用了来自平台代表、官僚、司机、专家的定性访谈数据和政策文件。研究结果打车领域的监管发展不能被解释为线性发展。静态的制度假设,尤其是在政策制定过程中不考虑多角色和多层次的假设,并不能充分服务于不同时空的相关参与者。区域水文计划条例必须考虑到新的区域水文计划的视角及其可获得的支持。如果不考虑区域保健计划的短期和长期视角,可能会对已有的和新的区域保健计划产生不平等的结果。研究局限性/影响本研究对数字经济监管生态系统、发展伙伴关系和政策制定者都有影响。虽然来自法律文件和定性访谈的数据是充分的,但如果能获得来自区域保健计划的交易数据,并与司法人员进行访谈,则会更有见地。社会影响这项研究显示了数字空间中的互动以及法规如何影响不同的参与者。一项平衡的政策可以引导 DP 的发展道路,使其拥有平等的机会。本文研究了 DP 的监管发展以及治理和控制对相关参与者和平台生态系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信