Comparison of the effectiveness of project-based 6E learning and problem-based quantum learning: Solomon four-group design

Şeyma Şahin, Abdurrahman Kılıç
{"title":"Comparison of the effectiveness of project-based 6E learning and problem-based quantum learning: Solomon four-group design","authors":"Şeyma Şahin, Abdurrahman Kılıç","doi":"10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeResearchers have previously utilized the project-based 6E learning model and the problem-based quantum learning model in various courses, such as the instructional principles and methods course and the character and values education course. These models were evaluated for their impact on students in different subjects, including developing skills, values, democracy perceptions, attitudes towards cooperative learning, metacognitive thinking skills and teacher self-efficacy perceptions. In 2023, Ökmen, Sahin and Kiliç reported positive outcomes, while Sahin and Kiliç reported similar findings in 2023a, 2023b and 2023c. There has been no investigation into how the models affect students' critical thinking and academic literacy. This study seeks to determine the impact of both models on these skills, gain more insight into their effectiveness and determine which is more beneficial. The results will guide the decision-making process for the character and values education course and other courses in the future. Specifically, this research aims to compare the effects of the project-based 6E learning model and problem-based quantum learning model on critical thinking and academic literacy.Design/methodology/approachThis research employed the Solomon four-group experimental design to assess the efficacy of the applications. Prior knowledge and experience of the participants were evaluated through pretests. However, it should be noted that pretests may impact posttest scores either positively or negatively. For instance, participants taking the test multiple times may become more interested or attentive to the subject matter. The Solomon four-group design was deemed appropriate to analyze the influence of pretesting. This design enables the investigation of the application effect, pretest effect and interactive effect of pretest and application (van Engelenburg, 1999).FindingsIt was concluded that the project-based 6E learning model was effective in developing critical thinking in students, but not significantly. It was concluded that the problem-based quantum learning model significantly improved students' critical thinking skills. It was concluded at the end of the study that the project-based 6E learning model notably enhanced students' academic literacy. It was concluded that the problem-based quantum learning model had a significant positive impact on students' academic literacy. According to research, it has been determined that the problem-based quantum learning model is superior in enhancing critical thinking abilities compared to the project-based 6E learning model. Nevertheless, there seems to be no detectable disparity in the academic literacy advancement of pupils between the problem-based quantum learning model and the project-based 6E learning model.Originality/valueThere has been no investigation into how the models affect students' critical thinking and academic literacy. This study seeks to determine the impact of both models on these skills, gain more insight into their effectiveness and determine which is more beneficial. The results will guide the decision-making process for the character and values education course and other courses in the future.","PeriodicalId":244951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","volume":"27 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeResearchers have previously utilized the project-based 6E learning model and the problem-based quantum learning model in various courses, such as the instructional principles and methods course and the character and values education course. These models were evaluated for their impact on students in different subjects, including developing skills, values, democracy perceptions, attitudes towards cooperative learning, metacognitive thinking skills and teacher self-efficacy perceptions. In 2023, Ökmen, Sahin and Kiliç reported positive outcomes, while Sahin and Kiliç reported similar findings in 2023a, 2023b and 2023c. There has been no investigation into how the models affect students' critical thinking and academic literacy. This study seeks to determine the impact of both models on these skills, gain more insight into their effectiveness and determine which is more beneficial. The results will guide the decision-making process for the character and values education course and other courses in the future. Specifically, this research aims to compare the effects of the project-based 6E learning model and problem-based quantum learning model on critical thinking and academic literacy.Design/methodology/approachThis research employed the Solomon four-group experimental design to assess the efficacy of the applications. Prior knowledge and experience of the participants were evaluated through pretests. However, it should be noted that pretests may impact posttest scores either positively or negatively. For instance, participants taking the test multiple times may become more interested or attentive to the subject matter. The Solomon four-group design was deemed appropriate to analyze the influence of pretesting. This design enables the investigation of the application effect, pretest effect and interactive effect of pretest and application (van Engelenburg, 1999).FindingsIt was concluded that the project-based 6E learning model was effective in developing critical thinking in students, but not significantly. It was concluded that the problem-based quantum learning model significantly improved students' critical thinking skills. It was concluded at the end of the study that the project-based 6E learning model notably enhanced students' academic literacy. It was concluded that the problem-based quantum learning model had a significant positive impact on students' academic literacy. According to research, it has been determined that the problem-based quantum learning model is superior in enhancing critical thinking abilities compared to the project-based 6E learning model. Nevertheless, there seems to be no detectable disparity in the academic literacy advancement of pupils between the problem-based quantum learning model and the project-based 6E learning model.Originality/valueThere has been no investigation into how the models affect students' critical thinking and academic literacy. This study seeks to determine the impact of both models on these skills, gain more insight into their effectiveness and determine which is more beneficial. The results will guide the decision-making process for the character and values education course and other courses in the future.
基于项目的 6E 学习与基于问题的量子学习的效果比较:所罗门四组设计
目的研究人员曾在不同课程(如教学原理与方法课程和品德与价值观教育课程)中使用基于项目的 6E 学习模式和基于问题的量子学习模式。研究人员评估了这些模式对不同学科学生的影响,包括培养技能、价值观、民主观念、合作学习态度、元认知思维能力和教师自我效能感。2023 年,Ökmen、Sahin 和 Kiliç 报告了积极的成果,而 2023a、2023b 和 2023c 年,Sahin 和 Kiliç 报告了类似的结果。目前还没有研究这些模式如何影响学生的批判性思维和学术素养。本研究旨在确定两种模式对这些技能的影响,更深入地了解它们的有效性,并确定哪种模式更有益。研究结果将为今后品德与价值观教育课程和其他课程的决策过程提供指导。具体而言,本研究旨在比较基于项目的 6E 学习模式和基于问题的量子学习模式对批判性思维和学术素养的影响。通过前测评估了参与者的先前知识和经验。但需要注意的是,前测可能会对后测成绩产生积极或消极的影响。例如,多次参加测试的参与者可能会对测试主题更感兴趣或更专注。所罗门四组设计被认为是分析前测影响的合适方法。研究结果得出结论,基于项目的 6E 学习模式对培养学生的批判性思维有效,但效果并不显著。结论是基于问题的量子学习模式明显提高了学生的批判性思维能力。研究最后得出结论,基于项目的 6E 学习模式明显提高了学生的学术素养。最后得出结论,基于问题的量子学习模式对学生的学术素养产生了显著的积极影响。研究表明,与基于项目的 6E 学习模式相比,基于问题的量子学习模式在提高批判性思维能力方面更具优势。然而,基于问题的量子学习模式和基于项目的 6E 学习模式在提高学生学术素养方面似乎没有明显的差异。本研究旨在确定两种模式对这些技能的影响,更深入地了解它们的有效性,并确定哪种模式更有益。研究结果将为今后的品德与价值观教育课程和其他课程的决策过程提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信