Can natural scenes cue attention to multiple locations? Evidence from eye-movements in contextual cueing

Josefine Albert, Werner X. Schneider, Christian H. Poth
{"title":"Can natural scenes cue attention to multiple locations? Evidence from eye-movements in contextual cueing","authors":"Josefine Albert, Werner X. Schneider, Christian H. Poth","doi":"10.3389/fcogn.2024.1352656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans find visual targets more quickly when the target appears at the same location in a repeated configuration of other stimuli. However, when the target alternates between two locations in the repeated configuration, the benefit for visual search is smaller. This reduction of benefits has been explained as the result of an averaging of a benefit for one location and a cost for the other location. In two experiments, we investigated this two-target-locations effect in real-world scenes using high-resolution eye-tracking. Experiment 1 adapted a study in which subjects searched for a small “T” or “L” superimposed on real-world photographs. Half of the trials showed repeated scenes with one possible target location each; half showed novel scenes. We replicated the pronounced contextual cueing effect in real-world scenes. In Experiment 2, two conditions were added. In one of them, targets appeared in repeated scenes alternating between two possible locations per scene. In the other condition, targets appeared in repeated scenes but at new locations, constrained to one side of the screen. Subjects were faster to search for and identify a target in repeated scenes than in novel scenes, including when the scene was paired with two alternating target locations and (after extensive training) even when the scene only predicted the hemifield. Separate analyses on the two possible target locations resulted in rejection of the suggestion of costs for the additional target location, since the contextual cueing effect was present in the second half of the experiment for both the favored and the less favored target location. The eye-tracking data demonstrated that contextual cueing influences searching fixations, characteristic of attentional guidance, rather than responding fixations, characteristic of facilitation of response processes. Further, these data revealed that adding another possible target location leads to less guidance, rather than impeding response processes. Thus, this study delivers evidence for a flexible and attentional guidance mechanism that is able to prioritize more than one location in natural contexts.","PeriodicalId":513511,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cognition","volume":"44 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2024.1352656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans find visual targets more quickly when the target appears at the same location in a repeated configuration of other stimuli. However, when the target alternates between two locations in the repeated configuration, the benefit for visual search is smaller. This reduction of benefits has been explained as the result of an averaging of a benefit for one location and a cost for the other location. In two experiments, we investigated this two-target-locations effect in real-world scenes using high-resolution eye-tracking. Experiment 1 adapted a study in which subjects searched for a small “T” or “L” superimposed on real-world photographs. Half of the trials showed repeated scenes with one possible target location each; half showed novel scenes. We replicated the pronounced contextual cueing effect in real-world scenes. In Experiment 2, two conditions were added. In one of them, targets appeared in repeated scenes alternating between two possible locations per scene. In the other condition, targets appeared in repeated scenes but at new locations, constrained to one side of the screen. Subjects were faster to search for and identify a target in repeated scenes than in novel scenes, including when the scene was paired with two alternating target locations and (after extensive training) even when the scene only predicted the hemifield. Separate analyses on the two possible target locations resulted in rejection of the suggestion of costs for the additional target location, since the contextual cueing effect was present in the second half of the experiment for both the favored and the less favored target location. The eye-tracking data demonstrated that contextual cueing influences searching fixations, characteristic of attentional guidance, rather than responding fixations, characteristic of facilitation of response processes. Further, these data revealed that adding another possible target location leads to less guidance, rather than impeding response processes. Thus, this study delivers evidence for a flexible and attentional guidance mechanism that is able to prioritize more than one location in natural contexts.
自然场景能否将注意力引向多个地点?眼动在情境提示中的作用
当目标出现在其他刺激重复配置的同一位置时,人类能更快地找到视觉目标。然而,当目标在重复配置中的两个位置交替出现时,视觉搜索的收益就会减少。这种收益的减少被解释为一个位置的收益和另一个位置的成本平均化的结果。在两个实验中,我们利用高分辨率眼动跟踪技术研究了真实世界场景中的双目标位置效应。实验一改编了一项研究,受试者在真实世界的照片上寻找叠加的小 "T "或 "L"。一半的试验显示的是重复场景,每个场景都有一个可能的目标位置;一半的试验显示的是新场景。我们在真实场景中复制了明显的情境提示效应。实验 2 增加了两个条件。在其中一个条件中,目标出现在重复场景中,每个场景交替出现两个可能的位置。在另一个条件中,目标出现在重复的场景中,但在新的位置,被限制在屏幕的一侧。与新场景相比,受试者在重复场景中搜索和识别目标的速度更快,包括当场景与两个交替的目标位置配对时,甚至当场景只预测半视野时(经过大量训练后)。对两个可能的目标位置进行单独分析的结果,是否定了额外目标位置的成本的说法,因为在实验的后半段,无论是对偏爱的目标位置还是对不太偏爱的目标位置,都存在情境提示效应。眼动跟踪数据表明,情境提示影响的是具有注意引导特征的搜索定点,而不是具有反应过程促进特征的反应定点。此外,这些数据还显示,增加另一个可能的目标位置会导致较少的引导,而不是阻碍反应过程。因此,这项研究为一种灵活的注意引导机制提供了证据,这种机制能够在自然情境中优先考虑多个位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信