Enabling robustness to failure with modular field robots

Troy Cordie, Jonathan Roberts, Matthew Dunbabin, Ross Dungavell, Tirthankar Bandyopadhyay
{"title":"Enabling robustness to failure with modular field robots","authors":"Troy Cordie, Jonathan Roberts, Matthew Dunbabin, Ross Dungavell, Tirthankar Bandyopadhyay","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1225297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Actuator failure on a remotely deployed robot results in decreased efficiency or even renders it inoperable. Robustness to these failures will become critical as robots are required to be more independent and operate out of the range of repair. To address these challenges, we present two approaches based on modular robotic architecture to improve robustness to actuator failure of both fixed-configuration robots and modular reconfigurable robots. Our work uses modular reconfigurable robots capable of modifying their style of locomotion and changing their designed morphology through ejecting modules. This framework improved the distance travelled and decreased the effort to move through the environment of simulated and physical robots. When the deployed robot was allowed to change its locomotion style, it showed improved robustness to actuator failure when compared to a robot with a fixed controller. Furthermore, a robot capable of changing its locomotion and design morphology statistically outlasted both tests with a fixed morphology. Testing was carried out using a gazebo simulation and validated in multiple tests in the field. We show for the first time that ejecting modular failed components can improve the overall mission length.","PeriodicalId":504612,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1225297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actuator failure on a remotely deployed robot results in decreased efficiency or even renders it inoperable. Robustness to these failures will become critical as robots are required to be more independent and operate out of the range of repair. To address these challenges, we present two approaches based on modular robotic architecture to improve robustness to actuator failure of both fixed-configuration robots and modular reconfigurable robots. Our work uses modular reconfigurable robots capable of modifying their style of locomotion and changing their designed morphology through ejecting modules. This framework improved the distance travelled and decreased the effort to move through the environment of simulated and physical robots. When the deployed robot was allowed to change its locomotion style, it showed improved robustness to actuator failure when compared to a robot with a fixed controller. Furthermore, a robot capable of changing its locomotion and design morphology statistically outlasted both tests with a fixed morphology. Testing was carried out using a gazebo simulation and validated in multiple tests in the field. We show for the first time that ejecting modular failed components can improve the overall mission length.
利用模块化野外机器人实现故障鲁棒性
远程部署机器人的执行器故障会导致效率降低,甚至无法运行。随着机器人需要更加独立,并在维修范围之外运行,这些故障的鲁棒性将变得至关重要。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了两种基于模块化机器人架构的方法,以提高固定配置机器人和模块化可重构机器人对致动器故障的鲁棒性。我们的工作使用模块化可重构机器人,这种机器人能够通过弹出模块来改变运动方式和设计形态。这一框架提高了机器人的移动距离,减少了机器人在模拟环境和物理环境中移动的难度。与使用固定控制器的机器人相比,当部署的机器人可以改变运动方式时,它对致动器故障的鲁棒性得到了提高。此外,能够改变运动和设计形态的机器人在统计上超过了采用固定形态的两种测试。测试是通过凉亭模拟进行的,并在现场的多次测试中得到了验证。我们首次展示了弹射模块化故障组件可以改善整体任务长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信