Cost analysis of different medical oxygen sources for a healthcare facility in India

Varun Manhas, Mahipal Rawat, Yogesh S. Kaurav, Sanjay Goyal, Sanjay Dhir, Kalyani Sangineni
{"title":"Cost analysis of different medical oxygen sources for a healthcare facility in India","authors":"Varun Manhas, Mahipal Rawat, Yogesh S. Kaurav, Sanjay Goyal, Sanjay Dhir, Kalyani Sangineni","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_335_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Multiple sources of medical oxygen, namely liquid medical oxygen (LMO) tanks, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) plants, concentrators, and gaseous cylinders, are available at different healthcare facilities. These sources of oxygen have varying installation and operational costs. In low-resource settings, it is imperative to utilise these assets optimally. This study investigated the operational costs of multiple oxygen sources available at a healthcare facility.\n \n \n \n A Microsoft (MS) Excel-based model was developed to analyse and compare the oxygen manufacturing costs (in ₹/m3) using PSA plants and procurement costs (in ₹/m3) of LMO and third-party vendor-refilled cylinders.\n \n \n \n The oxygen manufacturing costs for PSA plants of different capacities and running times on electricity and diesel generators (DGs) as a power source were calculated. This study highlights the cost-benefit of using PSA plants over LMO and third-party vendor-refilled cylinders as a source of oxygen. PSA plants are most economical when they are of higher capacity and used to their maximum capacity on electricity as the power source. On the contrary, they are most expensive when used on a DG set as a power source. Furthermore, this study provides evidence of PSA plants being more cost-effective for refilling cylinders using a booster compressor unit when compared to third-party vendor-cylinder refilling.\n \n \n \n Given their cost-effectiveness and low third-party dependence, they should be utilised to their maximum capacity as medical oxygen sources at healthcare facilities.\n","PeriodicalId":510762,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_335_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sources of medical oxygen, namely liquid medical oxygen (LMO) tanks, pressure swing adsorption (PSA) plants, concentrators, and gaseous cylinders, are available at different healthcare facilities. These sources of oxygen have varying installation and operational costs. In low-resource settings, it is imperative to utilise these assets optimally. This study investigated the operational costs of multiple oxygen sources available at a healthcare facility. A Microsoft (MS) Excel-based model was developed to analyse and compare the oxygen manufacturing costs (in ₹/m3) using PSA plants and procurement costs (in ₹/m3) of LMO and third-party vendor-refilled cylinders. The oxygen manufacturing costs for PSA plants of different capacities and running times on electricity and diesel generators (DGs) as a power source were calculated. This study highlights the cost-benefit of using PSA plants over LMO and third-party vendor-refilled cylinders as a source of oxygen. PSA plants are most economical when they are of higher capacity and used to their maximum capacity on electricity as the power source. On the contrary, they are most expensive when used on a DG set as a power source. Furthermore, this study provides evidence of PSA plants being more cost-effective for refilling cylinders using a booster compressor unit when compared to third-party vendor-cylinder refilling. Given their cost-effectiveness and low third-party dependence, they should be utilised to their maximum capacity as medical oxygen sources at healthcare facilities.
印度一家医疗机构不同医用氧源的成本分析
不同的医疗机构有多种医用氧气来源,即液态医用氧气(LMO)罐、变压吸附(PSA)设备、浓缩器和气瓶。这些氧气来源的安装和运营成本各不相同。在资源匮乏的环境中,必须优化利用这些资产。本研究调查了一家医疗机构的多种氧气源的运营成本。 研究人员开发了一个基于 Microsoft (MS) Excel 的模型,用于分析和比较使用 PSA 工厂的氧气制造成本(单位:₹/m3)以及 LMO 和第三方供应商灌装气瓶的采购成本(单位:₹/m3)。 研究还计算了以电力和柴油发电机 (DG) 作为动力源的不同产能和运行时间的 PSA 工厂的制氧成本。这项研究强调了使用 PSA 设备比使用 LMO 和第三方供应商充气钢瓶作为氧气来源的成本效益。当 PSA 设备的产能较高并以电力为动力源使用到最大产能时,其成本效益最高。相反,以 DG 机组为电源时, PSA 设备的成本最高。此外,本研究还证明,与第三方供应商气瓶加注相比,使用增压压缩机装置进行气瓶加注的 PSA 设备更具成本效益。 鉴于 PSA 设备的成本效益和对第三方的低依赖性,医疗保健设施应最大限度地利用 PSA 设备作为医用氧气源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书