The Auditor’s Responsibility is to Apply the Concept of Materiality in Accordance with the Standard (ISA.320) in Determining Analytical Audit Procedures to Reduce Audit Risks

Jaafar Abdulhussein, Hilo Aljabi
{"title":"The Auditor’s Responsibility is to Apply the Concept of Materiality in Accordance with the Standard (ISA.320) in Determining Analytical Audit Procedures to Reduce Audit Risks","authors":"Jaafar Abdulhussein, Hilo Aljabi","doi":"10.47577/business.v7i.10787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to clarify the auditor’s responsibility for applying the concept of materiality in accordance with the (ISA.320) standard in determining the analytical audit procedures represented by the process of assessing audit risks. To achieve the research aims, the descriptive analytical approach was used to deal with data collection and classification. The main study tool, represented by the questionnaire form, was used to collect data from the study sample, which was analyzed through the SPSS program. The questionnaire was distributed to a number of sample members, and the number was suitable for conducting statistical analysis, as it reached 45 questionnaires, of which 40 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. The most important conclusions were that there is a statistically significant effect of the auditor’s analytical procedures when applying the International Auditing Standard Materiality (ISA.320) in assessing audit risks. The study recommended the need for the Accounting and Auditing Council to take measures to verify the compliance of Iraqi audit offices with audit risk assessment procedures through the use of analytical procedures by the auditor in accordance with International Auditing Standard 320 Materiality","PeriodicalId":341074,"journal":{"name":"Technium Business and Management","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technium Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/business.v7i.10787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aims to clarify the auditor’s responsibility for applying the concept of materiality in accordance with the (ISA.320) standard in determining the analytical audit procedures represented by the process of assessing audit risks. To achieve the research aims, the descriptive analytical approach was used to deal with data collection and classification. The main study tool, represented by the questionnaire form, was used to collect data from the study sample, which was analyzed through the SPSS program. The questionnaire was distributed to a number of sample members, and the number was suitable for conducting statistical analysis, as it reached 45 questionnaires, of which 40 questionnaires were suitable for analysis. The most important conclusions were that there is a statistically significant effect of the auditor’s analytical procedures when applying the International Auditing Standard Materiality (ISA.320) in assessing audit risks. The study recommended the need for the Accounting and Auditing Council to take measures to verify the compliance of Iraqi audit offices with audit risk assessment procedures through the use of analytical procedures by the auditor in accordance with International Auditing Standard 320 Materiality
审计师的责任是根据准则(ISA.320)运用重要性概念确定分析性审计程序,以降低审计风险
本研究旨在阐明审计师在确定以审计风险评估过程为代表的分析性审计程序时,根据(ISA.320)标准应用重要性概念的责任。为实现研究目的,采用了描述性分析方法来处理数据收集和分类。以调查问卷为代表的主要研究工具用于从研究样本中收集数据,并通过 SPSS 程序进行分析。问卷发放给了一定数量的样本成员,问卷数量达到了 45 份,其中 40 份适合进行统计分析。最重要的结论是,在应用国际审计准则重要性(ISA.320)评估审计风险时,审计师的分析程序在统计学上有显著影响。研究建议,会计和审计委员会有必要采取措施,核实伊拉克审计局是否遵守了审计风险评估程序,审计师是否根据《国际审计准则》第 320 条 "重要性 "使用了分析程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信