ANALISIS KESELAMATAN UNTUK MENCEGAH KECELAKAAN PADA PROSES EVAPORASI DI INSTALASI ELEMEN BAKAR EKSPERIMENTAL DENGAN METODE HAZOPS

Putra Oktavianto, Noor Anis Kundari, A. Saputra, Imam Abdurrosyid, Andri Saputra
{"title":"ANALISIS KESELAMATAN UNTUK MENCEGAH KECELAKAAN PADA PROSES EVAPORASI DI INSTALASI ELEMEN BAKAR EKSPERIMENTAL DENGAN METODE HAZOPS","authors":"Putra Oktavianto, Noor Anis Kundari, A. Saputra, Imam Abdurrosyid, Andri Saputra","doi":"10.55981/gnd.2023.6844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SAFETY ANALYSIS TO PREVENT ACCIDENTS IN THE EVAPORATION PROCESS AT EXPERIMENTAL FUEL ELEMENT INSTALLATION WITH THE HAZOPS METHOD. The Experimental Fuel Element Installation (IEBE) DPFK-BRIN has implemented safety standards as a safety reference using Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Determining Control (HIRADC). The HIRADC method has several lacks, so its application is not optimal. In this study, as a complement to the HIRADC method, a risk analysis was carried out using the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOPS). The hazard identification was carried out during the evaporation process of the uranyl nitrate solution in the E-601 evaporator tank. The HAZOPS method is based on process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) to determine the potential hazards during evaporation. It is carried out by determining the nodes and parameters, analyzing deviations from each node or the potential danger of each node, the possible causes of deviations and their consequences, determining the likelihood scale and the level of risk, and making recommendations. Based on the assessment, six nodes were obtained, resulting in 11 deviations caused by 13 equipment malfunctions or failures. The risk assessment of 13 damages resulted in 1 potential low-hazard risk and 12 potential medium-hazard risks. The low-hazard risk category can be overcome by routine handling, such as preventive maintenance and regular equipment calibration. For the medium-hazard risk category, recommendations such as those for the low-hazard risk category and others are necessary to overcome deviations that may occur according to deviation type. According to safety assessment results, it can be concluded that HAZOPS can complement HIRADC to ensure safety is maintained during the process.","PeriodicalId":32551,"journal":{"name":"Ganendra Majalah IPTEK Nuklir","volume":"294 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ganendra Majalah IPTEK Nuklir","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55981/gnd.2023.6844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SAFETY ANALYSIS TO PREVENT ACCIDENTS IN THE EVAPORATION PROCESS AT EXPERIMENTAL FUEL ELEMENT INSTALLATION WITH THE HAZOPS METHOD. The Experimental Fuel Element Installation (IEBE) DPFK-BRIN has implemented safety standards as a safety reference using Hazard Identification Risk Assessment Determining Control (HIRADC). The HIRADC method has several lacks, so its application is not optimal. In this study, as a complement to the HIRADC method, a risk analysis was carried out using the Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOPS). The hazard identification was carried out during the evaporation process of the uranyl nitrate solution in the E-601 evaporator tank. The HAZOPS method is based on process and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) to determine the potential hazards during evaporation. It is carried out by determining the nodes and parameters, analyzing deviations from each node or the potential danger of each node, the possible causes of deviations and their consequences, determining the likelihood scale and the level of risk, and making recommendations. Based on the assessment, six nodes were obtained, resulting in 11 deviations caused by 13 equipment malfunctions or failures. The risk assessment of 13 damages resulted in 1 potential low-hazard risk and 12 potential medium-hazard risks. The low-hazard risk category can be overcome by routine handling, such as preventive maintenance and regular equipment calibration. For the medium-hazard risk category, recommendations such as those for the low-hazard risk category and others are necessary to overcome deviations that may occur according to deviation type. According to safety assessment results, it can be concluded that HAZOPS can complement HIRADC to ensure safety is maintained during the process.
用危害分析法对实验燃烧元件厂蒸发过程中的事故预防进行安全分析
在实验燃料元件装置的蒸发过程中采用危害分析方法预防事故的安全分析。燃料元件实验装置(IEBE)DPFK-BRIN 采用危害识别风险评估确定控制法(HIRADC),将安全标准作为安全参考。HIRADC 方法存在一些缺陷,因此其应用效果并不理想。在本研究中,作为对 HIRADC 方法的补充,使用了危险和可操作性研究(HAZOPS)进行风险分析。危险识别是在 E-601 蒸发罐中硝酸铀酰溶液的蒸发过程中进行的。HAZOPS 方法基于工艺和仪表图 (P&ID),用于确定蒸发过程中的潜在危险。它通过确定节点和参数、分析每个节点的偏差或每个节点的潜在危险、偏差的可能原因及其后果、确定可能性标度和风险等级,并提出建议。根据评估结果,获得了 6 个节点,导致 13 个设备故障或失灵造成 11 个偏差。对 13 项损害进行风险评估后,得出 1 项潜在低危害风险和 12 项潜在中等危害风险。低危害风险类别可通过日常处理来克服,如预防性维护和定期设备校准。对于中度危险风险类别,有必要根据偏差类型提出低度危险风险类别的建议和其他建议,以克服可能出现的偏差。根据安全评估结果,可以得出 HAZOPS 可以作为 HIRADC 的补充,确保工艺过程中的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信