Evolution of Regulatory Governance for Human Research in Costa Rica

Karol Ramírez
{"title":"Evolution of Regulatory Governance for Human Research in Costa Rica","authors":"Karol Ramírez","doi":"10.15517/ijds.2024.59202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory governance of human research derives from historical abuses of people participating in health related and non-health relates studies.  Costa Rica was no exception and nowadays counts with a Regulatory Law of Biomedical Research (Law 9234) that guarantees the protection of research participants’ human rights.  The aim of this narrative review is to overview the gradual development and state of the art of protections and oversight of research with humans in Costa Rica. A recapitulation of why regulatory governance for biomedical human research was enacted in 2014 will be discussed. Even so, there is no legal requirement in Costa Rica, as in other developing nations, for non-health related protocols with human participants, to undergo the scrutiny of research boards. Nonetheless, even before Law 9234 was passed, the University of Costa Rica made efforts to compel compliance with research ethics when studying humans. Therefore, another objective is to review the current ethical guidelines dictated by the University of Costa Rica and Scientifical Ethics Committee of the University of Costa Rica to conduct responsible human research. The University of Costa Rica’s institutional regulatory framework on human research, can serve as a model to other national and international institutions from developing nations, where ethical assessment of sociocultural research is relatively neglected, compared to the review of biomedical and clinical studies.","PeriodicalId":509192,"journal":{"name":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"381 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.59202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulatory governance of human research derives from historical abuses of people participating in health related and non-health relates studies.  Costa Rica was no exception and nowadays counts with a Regulatory Law of Biomedical Research (Law 9234) that guarantees the protection of research participants’ human rights.  The aim of this narrative review is to overview the gradual development and state of the art of protections and oversight of research with humans in Costa Rica. A recapitulation of why regulatory governance for biomedical human research was enacted in 2014 will be discussed. Even so, there is no legal requirement in Costa Rica, as in other developing nations, for non-health related protocols with human participants, to undergo the scrutiny of research boards. Nonetheless, even before Law 9234 was passed, the University of Costa Rica made efforts to compel compliance with research ethics when studying humans. Therefore, another objective is to review the current ethical guidelines dictated by the University of Costa Rica and Scientifical Ethics Committee of the University of Costa Rica to conduct responsible human research. The University of Costa Rica’s institutional regulatory framework on human research, can serve as a model to other national and international institutions from developing nations, where ethical assessment of sociocultural research is relatively neglected, compared to the review of biomedical and clinical studies.
哥斯达黎加人类研究监管治理的演变
对人类研究的监管源于历史上对参与健康相关和非健康相关研究的人员的虐待。 哥斯达黎加也不例外,如今已制定了《生物医学研究监管法》(第 9234 号法律),保障研究参与者的人权。 本综述旨在概述哥斯达黎加在保护和监督人类研究方面的逐步发展和现状。此外,还将讨论 2014 年颁布人类生物医学研究监管条例的原因。尽管如此,哥斯达黎加与其他发展中国家一样,没有法律规定与人类参与者无关的健康协议必须接受研究委员会的审查。尽管如此,甚至在第 9234 号法律通过之前,哥斯达黎加大学就已做出努力,要求在研究人类时遵守研究伦理。因此,另一个目标是审查哥斯达黎加大学和哥斯达黎加大学科学伦理委员会规定的现行伦理准则,以开展负责任的人类研究。哥斯达黎加大学关于人类研究的机构监管框架可以为发展中国家的其他国家和国际机构树立榜样,因为与审查生物医学和临床研究相比,这些国家和国际机构相对忽视对社会文化研究的伦理评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信