Quantifying BIM investment value: a systematic review

Lina Gharaibeh, Kristina Eriksson, Bjorn Lantz
{"title":"Quantifying BIM investment value: a systematic review","authors":"Lina Gharaibeh, Kristina Eriksson, Bjorn Lantz","doi":"10.1108/jedt-06-2023-0259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nPerceived benefits of building information modelling (BIM) have been discussed for some time, but cost–benefit benchmarking has been inconsistent. The purpose of this paper is to investigate BIM feasibility and evaluate investment worth to elucidate and develop the current understanding of BIM merit. The aim of the study is to propose a research agenda towards a more holistic perspective of BIM use incorporating quantifying investment return.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn in-depth examination of research patterns has been conducted to identify challenges in the assessment of the investment value and return on investment (ROI) for BIM in the construction industry. A total of 75 research articles were considered for the final literature review. An evaluation of the literature is conducted using a combination of bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews.\n\nFindings\nThis study, which analysed 75 articles, unveils key findings in quantifying BIM benefits, primarily through ROI calculation. Two major research gaps are identified: the absence of a standardized BIM ROI method and insufficient exploration of intangible benefits. Research focus varies across phases, emphasizing design and construction integration and exploring post-construction phases. The study categorizes quantifiable factors, including productivity, changes and rework reduction, requests for information reduction, schedule efficiency, safety, environmental sustainability and operations and facility management. These findings offer vital insights for researchers and practitioners, enhancing understanding of ’BIM’s financial benefits and signalling areas for further exploration in construction.\n\nOriginality/value\nThe ’study’s outcomes offer the latest insights for researchers and practitioners to create effective approaches for quantifying ’BIM’s financial benefits. Additionally, the proposed research agenda aims to improve the current limited understanding of BIM feasibility and investment worth evaluation. Results of the study could assist practitioners in overcoming limitations associated with BIM investment and economic evaluations in the construction industry.\n","PeriodicalId":514531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","volume":"143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-06-2023-0259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Perceived benefits of building information modelling (BIM) have been discussed for some time, but cost–benefit benchmarking has been inconsistent. The purpose of this paper is to investigate BIM feasibility and evaluate investment worth to elucidate and develop the current understanding of BIM merit. The aim of the study is to propose a research agenda towards a more holistic perspective of BIM use incorporating quantifying investment return. Design/methodology/approach An in-depth examination of research patterns has been conducted to identify challenges in the assessment of the investment value and return on investment (ROI) for BIM in the construction industry. A total of 75 research articles were considered for the final literature review. An evaluation of the literature is conducted using a combination of bibliometric analysis and systematic reviews. Findings This study, which analysed 75 articles, unveils key findings in quantifying BIM benefits, primarily through ROI calculation. Two major research gaps are identified: the absence of a standardized BIM ROI method and insufficient exploration of intangible benefits. Research focus varies across phases, emphasizing design and construction integration and exploring post-construction phases. The study categorizes quantifiable factors, including productivity, changes and rework reduction, requests for information reduction, schedule efficiency, safety, environmental sustainability and operations and facility management. These findings offer vital insights for researchers and practitioners, enhancing understanding of ’BIM’s financial benefits and signalling areas for further exploration in construction. Originality/value The ’study’s outcomes offer the latest insights for researchers and practitioners to create effective approaches for quantifying ’BIM’s financial benefits. Additionally, the proposed research agenda aims to improve the current limited understanding of BIM feasibility and investment worth evaluation. Results of the study could assist practitioners in overcoming limitations associated with BIM investment and economic evaluations in the construction industry.
量化 BIM 投资价值:系统回顾
目的建筑信息模型(BIM)的预期效益已经讨论了一段时间,但成本效益基准却不一致。本文旨在调查 BIM 的可行性和评估投资价值,以阐明和发展当前对 BIM 优点的理解。本研究的目的是提出一个研究议程,以便从更全面的角度看待 BIM 的使用,并将投资回报量化。设计/方法/方法对研究模式进行了深入研究,以确定在评估建筑行业 BIM 的投资价值和投资回报(ROI)方面存在的挑战。最终的文献综述共考虑了 75 篇研究文章。本研究分析了 75 篇文章,揭示了量化 BIM 效益(主要通过投资回报率计算)方面的主要发现。发现了两大研究空白:缺乏标准化的 BIM 投资回报率方法和对无形效益的探索不足。不同阶段的研究重点各不相同,既强调设计和施工一体化,也探讨施工后阶段。研究对可量化因素进行了分类,包括生产率、变更和返工减少、信息需求减少、进度效率、安全性、环境可持续性以及运营和设施管理。这些研究结果为研究人员和从业人员提供了重要的见解,增强了对'BIM'财务效益的理解,并预示着在建筑业中需要进一步探索的领域。原创性/价值该研究成果为研究人员和从业人员提供了最新的见解,为量化'BIM'财务效益提供了有效的方法。此外,建议的研究议程旨在改善目前对 BIM 可行性和投资价值评估的有限理解。研究结果可帮助从业人员克服与建筑行业 BIM 投资和经济评估相关的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信