Evaluation of risk level assessment strategies in life Insurance: A review of the literature

Vijayakumar Varadarajan, Vijaya Kumar Kakumanu
{"title":"Evaluation of risk level assessment strategies in life Insurance: A review of the literature","authors":"Vijayakumar Varadarajan, Vijaya Kumar Kakumanu","doi":"10.32629/jai.v7i5.1147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The viability of every insurance company depends on risk assessment of new life policy proposals. Machine learning techniques are increasingly shown to double case processing speed, reducing manual evaluation time. The underwriter evaluates the risk in several ways, including financial and medical evaluations and category classification based on customer data and other factors like previous insurance information, clinical history, and financial data. This research examines different academics’ publications on risk prediction while offering a new insurance policy to an applicant. Multiple machine learning models developed by researchers have been extensively investigated. The researchers’ model evaluation criteria were analyzed to understand and discover study gaps. The article additionally analyses how researchers found an accurate machine-learning model. This report also analyses various scholars’ future work proposals to identify what could possibly be modified for further research. This study details the measures used by other academics to evaluate machine learning models. This study describes the criteria used by other scholars to evaluate machine learning models. The criteria used by investigators to assess the produced models were carefully evaluated to understand and spot any untapped potential for advancement. Researchers’ methods for finding an accurate machine-learning model are also examined in this article. In addition, this study analyses several researchers’ future work proposals to discover what may be changed for further research. Using previous academics’ work, this review suggests ways to enhance insurance manual procedures.","PeriodicalId":508223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32629/jai.v7i5.1147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The viability of every insurance company depends on risk assessment of new life policy proposals. Machine learning techniques are increasingly shown to double case processing speed, reducing manual evaluation time. The underwriter evaluates the risk in several ways, including financial and medical evaluations and category classification based on customer data and other factors like previous insurance information, clinical history, and financial data. This research examines different academics’ publications on risk prediction while offering a new insurance policy to an applicant. Multiple machine learning models developed by researchers have been extensively investigated. The researchers’ model evaluation criteria were analyzed to understand and discover study gaps. The article additionally analyses how researchers found an accurate machine-learning model. This report also analyses various scholars’ future work proposals to identify what could possibly be modified for further research. This study details the measures used by other academics to evaluate machine learning models. This study describes the criteria used by other scholars to evaluate machine learning models. The criteria used by investigators to assess the produced models were carefully evaluated to understand and spot any untapped potential for advancement. Researchers’ methods for finding an accurate machine-learning model are also examined in this article. In addition, this study analyses several researchers’ future work proposals to discover what may be changed for further research. Using previous academics’ work, this review suggests ways to enhance insurance manual procedures.
评估人寿保险的风险水平评估策略:文献综述
每家保险公司的生存能力都取决于对新人寿保单提案的风险评估。越来越多的事实表明,机器学习技术可将案件处理速度提高一倍,减少人工评估时间。承保人通过多种方式进行风险评估,包括财务和医疗评估,以及基于客户数据和其他因素(如以前的保险信息、临床病史和财务数据)的类别划分。本研究审查了不同学术机构发表的关于向申请人提供新保险单时的风险预测的论文。对研究人员开发的多种机器学习模型进行了广泛调查。通过分析研究人员的模型评估标准,了解并发现了研究中的不足。文章还分析了研究人员如何找到准确的机器学习模型。本报告还分析了不同学者的未来工作建议,以确定进一步研究中可能需要修改的内容。本研究详细介绍了其他学者用于评估机器学习模型的措施。本研究介绍了其他学者用来评估机器学习模型的标准。研究人员对所制作模型的评估标准进行了仔细评估,以了解和发现任何尚未开发的进步潜力。本文还研究了研究人员寻找精确机器学习模型的方法。此外,本研究还分析了几位研究人员的未来工作建议,以发现进一步研究可能需要改变的地方。本综述利用以往学者的工作成果,提出了改进保险人工程序的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信