A comparison of two obesity-related hypoventilation disorders – impact on sleep, quality of life and neurocognitive outcomes and the effects of PAP therapy

Yizhong Zheng, Brendon J. Yee, Keith Wong, R. Grunstein, Amanda Piper
{"title":"A comparison of two obesity-related hypoventilation disorders – impact on sleep, quality of life and neurocognitive outcomes and the effects of PAP therapy","authors":"Yizhong Zheng, Brendon J. Yee, Keith Wong, R. Grunstein, Amanda Piper","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Symptom burden and neurocognitive function have not been previous compared between patients with obesity-associated hypoventilation disorders (obesity hypoventilation syndrome, OHS) and hypoventilation in the setting of obesity and obstructive airways disease (OHAD). The aim of this study is to compare baseline sleep-related symptoms, health-related quality of life and neurocognitive function between OHS and OHAD and the impact of PAP therapy on these outcomes.\n \n \n \n ESS, PSQI, SF36, and various neurocognitive tests, in addition to anthropometric, polysomnography, lung function and blood gas data from participants with OHS and participants with OHAD, were included in the analysis. This data was originally collected in their respective randomised clinical trials, comparing the efficacy of different PAP modes (bilevel PAP versus CPAP) in resolving hypercapnia. Between groups (OHS vs OHAD), pre- and post-treatment (with 3 months of positive airway pressure) comparisons were made using linear mixed modelling.\n \n \n \n 45 OHS participants (mean age 51yo, 33% female, BMI 52kg/m2, FER 0.81, PaCO2 54mmHg, AHI 87/hr) and 32 OHAD participants (mean age 61yo, 31% female, BMI 43kg/m2, FER 0.60, PaCO2 54mmHg, AHI 59/hr) were included in the analysis. Both OHS and OHAD had similar baseline ESS (14(5.6) vs. 12(5.4)), Global PSQI (10(3.2) vs 11(4.8)), SF36 and neurocognitive test performances (other than OHAD had lower digit symbol substitution test performance). Treatment with PAP therapy resulted in similar ESS, Global PSQI, and SF36 improvements in both groups. Neurocognitive performance did not significantly improve after PAP therapy in either group.\n \n \n \n The symptom burden between two separate hypoventilation disorders (OHS and OHAD), in terms of sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life and cognitive function, were similar. OHS and OHAD had similar treatment responses in these parameters after 3 months of PAP therapy.\n","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Symptom burden and neurocognitive function have not been previous compared between patients with obesity-associated hypoventilation disorders (obesity hypoventilation syndrome, OHS) and hypoventilation in the setting of obesity and obstructive airways disease (OHAD). The aim of this study is to compare baseline sleep-related symptoms, health-related quality of life and neurocognitive function between OHS and OHAD and the impact of PAP therapy on these outcomes. ESS, PSQI, SF36, and various neurocognitive tests, in addition to anthropometric, polysomnography, lung function and blood gas data from participants with OHS and participants with OHAD, were included in the analysis. This data was originally collected in their respective randomised clinical trials, comparing the efficacy of different PAP modes (bilevel PAP versus CPAP) in resolving hypercapnia. Between groups (OHS vs OHAD), pre- and post-treatment (with 3 months of positive airway pressure) comparisons were made using linear mixed modelling. 45 OHS participants (mean age 51yo, 33% female, BMI 52kg/m2, FER 0.81, PaCO2 54mmHg, AHI 87/hr) and 32 OHAD participants (mean age 61yo, 31% female, BMI 43kg/m2, FER 0.60, PaCO2 54mmHg, AHI 59/hr) were included in the analysis. Both OHS and OHAD had similar baseline ESS (14(5.6) vs. 12(5.4)), Global PSQI (10(3.2) vs 11(4.8)), SF36 and neurocognitive test performances (other than OHAD had lower digit symbol substitution test performance). Treatment with PAP therapy resulted in similar ESS, Global PSQI, and SF36 improvements in both groups. Neurocognitive performance did not significantly improve after PAP therapy in either group. The symptom burden between two separate hypoventilation disorders (OHS and OHAD), in terms of sleepiness, sleep quality, quality of life and cognitive function, were similar. OHS and OHAD had similar treatment responses in these parameters after 3 months of PAP therapy.
两种与肥胖有关的换气不足疾病的比较--对睡眠、生活质量和神经认知结果的影响以及 PAP 治疗的效果
肥胖相关低通气障碍(肥胖低通气综合征,OHS)患者的症状负担和神经认知功能与肥胖和阻塞性气道疾病(OHAD)时的低通气患者的症状负担和神经认知功能以前从未进行过比较。本研究旨在比较 OHS 和 OHAD 的基线睡眠相关症状、健康相关生活质量和神经认知功能,以及 PAP 治疗对这些结果的影响。 除人体测量、多导睡眠图、肺功能和血气数据外,ESS、PSQI、SF36 和各种神经认知测试也被纳入分析范围,这些数据分别来自 OHS 患者和 OHAD 患者。这些数据最初是在各自的随机临床试验中收集的,这些试验比较了不同的气压通气模式(双水平气压通气与 CPAP)在解决高碳酸血症方面的疗效。采用线性混合模型对各组之间(OHS vs OHAD)、治疗前后(使用 3 个月的气道正压)进行了比较。 45 名 OHS 患者(平均年龄 51 岁,33% 为女性,体重指数 52kg/m2,FER 0.81,PaCO2 54mmHg,AHI 87/小时)和 32 名 OHAD 患者(平均年龄 61 岁,31% 为女性,体重指数 43kg/m2,FER 0.60,PaCO2 54mmHg,AHI 59/小时)被纳入分析。OHS 和 OHAD 的基线 ESS(14(5.6) vs. 12(5.4))、Global PSQI(10(3.2) vs. 11(4.8))、SF36 和神经认知测试成绩(OHAD 的数字符号替换测试成绩较低除外)均相似。接受 PAP 治疗后,两组患者的 ESS、Global PSQI 和 SF36 改善情况相似。两组患者在接受 PAP 治疗后,神经认知能力均无明显改善。 就嗜睡、睡眠质量、生活质量和认知功能而言,两种不同的换气不足疾病(OHS 和 OHAD)的症状负担相似。在使用呼吸机治疗 3 个月后,OHS 和 OHAD 对这些参数的治疗反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信