Issues of accounting for intangible assets under the new standard at the stage of their identification

Tatiana Yurievna Serebryakova, Elena V. Karpova
{"title":"Issues of accounting for intangible assets under the new standard at the stage of their identification","authors":"Tatiana Yurievna Serebryakova, Elena V. Karpova","doi":"10.24891/ia.27.3.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subject. Since 2024, the new Federal Accounting Standard (FSBU) 14/2022 – Intangible Assets is mandatory. This article examines the categorical framework of this Standard, as well as the past and international standards in comparison with legal norms.\nObjectives. The article aims to identify the types of intangible assets to be accounted for in accordance with the new Standard, based on the essence and generic features, the legal content of the types of intangible assets mentioned in the accounting standards in order to identify them, based on their importance in generating economic benefits and participating in the processes of the organization.\nMethods. For the study, we used the general scientific methods of cognition, a systems approach, logical generalization, analysis and synthesis, and analogy.\nResults. The study shows that the new Standard is not much different from the old one in terms of defining categories. In contrast to the international similar standard, the domestic standard lacks detailed explanations that are essential for identifying costs as expenses of the period or intangible assets.\nConclusions and Relevance. For the reasonable recognition of intangible assets in accounting, it is necessary that the Standard takes into account the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other laws that make it possible to distinguish between generic and essential features of intangible assets, which are the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. The presented results are intended to further develop the methodology and practice of accounting for intangible assets of organizations.","PeriodicalId":507452,"journal":{"name":"International Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.27.3.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subject. Since 2024, the new Federal Accounting Standard (FSBU) 14/2022 – Intangible Assets is mandatory. This article examines the categorical framework of this Standard, as well as the past and international standards in comparison with legal norms. Objectives. The article aims to identify the types of intangible assets to be accounted for in accordance with the new Standard, based on the essence and generic features, the legal content of the types of intangible assets mentioned in the accounting standards in order to identify them, based on their importance in generating economic benefits and participating in the processes of the organization. Methods. For the study, we used the general scientific methods of cognition, a systems approach, logical generalization, analysis and synthesis, and analogy. Results. The study shows that the new Standard is not much different from the old one in terms of defining categories. In contrast to the international similar standard, the domestic standard lacks detailed explanations that are essential for identifying costs as expenses of the period or intangible assets. Conclusions and Relevance. For the reasonable recognition of intangible assets in accounting, it is necessary that the Standard takes into account the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other laws that make it possible to distinguish between generic and essential features of intangible assets, which are the results of intellectual activity and means of individualization. The presented results are intended to further develop the methodology and practice of accounting for intangible assets of organizations.
新准则下无形资产确认阶段的会计问题
主题自 2024 年起,新的《联邦会计准则》(FSBU)14/2022 - 无形资产必须执行。本文研究了该准则的分类框架,以及过去和国际准则与法律规范的比较。本文旨在根据无形资产在产生经济效益和参与组织流程方面的重要性,从本质和一般特征、会计准则中提及的无形资产类型的法律内容出发,确定按照新准则进行核算的无形资产类型。在研究中,我们采用了认知、系统方法、逻辑概括、分析和综合以及类比等一般科学方法。研究表明,新标准在定义类别方面与旧标准并无太大区别。与国际同类标准相比,国内标准缺乏详细解释,而这些解释对于将成本确定为期间费用或无形资产至关重要。为了在会计核算中合理确认无形资产,该标准必须考虑到《俄罗斯联邦民法典》和其 他法律的规范,以便区分无形资产的一般特征和基本特征,即智力活动成果和个性化手段。所介绍的结果旨在进一步发展各组织无形资产会计的方法和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信