Theorising Digital Dispossession: An Enquiry into the Datafication of Accumulation by Dispossession

Aishik Saha
{"title":"Theorising Digital Dispossession: An Enquiry into the Datafication of Accumulation by Dispossession","authors":"Aishik Saha","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the question of work and labour was being deeply pondered upon. The demarcations that emerged out of this juncture led to a bifurcation of labour into ‘essential workers’, who are pushed into precarity from the threat of disease and contractual uncertainty in employment, and those who ‘work from home’. While geo-spatial segregation of these distinctions is contingent upon the specific relation of the nature of work with datafication, we are impelled to ponder upon the role that the accumulation of surplus value plays in this process. More specifically we must ask, what role does digital labour play in the datafication and datafied reorganization of work and workplaces? The inadequateness of data colonialism as a theoretical tool that accounts for the historical-materialist and dialectical roots of extraction and accumulation of user data requires a retheorization of the process. In this paper, I shall examine the ontological inadequacies of the metaphors of colonialism, and its extractivist logic, being transposed and mapped onto the studies of datafication. Following this I shall explore ‘digital dispossession’ as a convergence of Digital Capitalism and the neoliberal reorganization of digitized social labour, alongside its necropolitical implications. Drawing upon David Harvey’s theorization of ‘Accumulation by Dispossession’, I argue for a classical Marxist interpretation of datafication as a new reorganization of capitalist accumulation that acts and appropriates surplus generated by prosumers through the unpaid and discursive digital labour performed on digital platforms.","PeriodicalId":517173,"journal":{"name":"tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","volume":"41 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, the question of work and labour was being deeply pondered upon. The demarcations that emerged out of this juncture led to a bifurcation of labour into ‘essential workers’, who are pushed into precarity from the threat of disease and contractual uncertainty in employment, and those who ‘work from home’. While geo-spatial segregation of these distinctions is contingent upon the specific relation of the nature of work with datafication, we are impelled to ponder upon the role that the accumulation of surplus value plays in this process. More specifically we must ask, what role does digital labour play in the datafication and datafied reorganization of work and workplaces? The inadequateness of data colonialism as a theoretical tool that accounts for the historical-materialist and dialectical roots of extraction and accumulation of user data requires a retheorization of the process. In this paper, I shall examine the ontological inadequacies of the metaphors of colonialism, and its extractivist logic, being transposed and mapped onto the studies of datafication. Following this I shall explore ‘digital dispossession’ as a convergence of Digital Capitalism and the neoliberal reorganization of digitized social labour, alongside its necropolitical implications. Drawing upon David Harvey’s theorization of ‘Accumulation by Dispossession’, I argue for a classical Marxist interpretation of datafication as a new reorganization of capitalist accumulation that acts and appropriates surplus generated by prosumers through the unpaid and discursive digital labour performed on digital platforms.
数字剥夺理论化:对剥夺积累数据化的探究
在 COVID-19 大流行之后,人们开始深入思考工作和劳动的问题。在这一关键时刻出现的分界导致劳动力被分为 "基本工人 "和 "在家工作 "两种,前者因疾病威胁和就业合同的不确定性而陷入不稳定状态。虽然这些区分的地理空间分隔取决于工作性质与数据化的具体关系,但我们不得不思考剩余价值的积累在这一过程中所扮演的角色。更具体地说,我们必须要问,数字劳动在工作和工作场所的数据化和数据化重组中扮演了什么角色?数据殖民主义作为一种理论工具,不足以解释用户数据提取和积累的历史唯物主义和辩证根源,因此需要对这一过程进行重新理论化。在本文中,我将探讨将殖民主义的隐喻及其萃取逻辑移植和映射到数据化研究中的本体论缺陷。随后,我将探讨 "数字剥夺 "作为数字资本主义和新自由主义对数字化社会劳动重组的汇合点,以及其对死亡政治的影响。借鉴戴维-哈维(David Harvey)的 "剥夺式积累 "理论,我主张用经典马克思主义解释数据化,将其视为资本主义积累的新重组,即通过在数字平台上从事无偿和话语性的数字劳动,作用和占有由消费者产生的剩余。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信