After a few months, what are the uses of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in medicine? A Scopus-based systematic review

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jeel Moya-Salazar, Carmen R Salazar, Stephany S Delzo, Eliane A. Goicochea-Palomino, Victor Rojas-Zumaran
{"title":"After a few months, what are the uses of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in medicine? A Scopus-based systematic review","authors":"Jeel Moya-Salazar, Carmen R Salazar, Stephany S Delzo, Eliane A. Goicochea-Palomino, Victor Rojas-Zumaran","doi":"10.29333/ejgm/14354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute ChatGPT, an artificial inteeligence-powered chatbot, presents a potential influence on healthcare and research in medicine. In this investigation, we systematically reviewed medical literature regarding the utilization of ChatGPT, utilizing the Scopus database.\nMethods: This systematic review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and according to the search in Scopus, 11,219 articles were identified. Original studies, clinical trials, correspondence articles, letters, notes, and research protocols were included, resulting in 14 studies.\nResults: All studies were published in 2023, among them 35.7% (5/14) were editorials and 14.3% (2/14) were opinion or perspective articles. Only one study (19) conducted a pilot study on the application of ChatGPT in medical diagnosis. Furthermore, 64.3% of the studies were published in quartile 1 journals according to Scimago rankings, and the USA had the highest production of articles on ChatGPT in medicine (35.7%). The included studies highlighted the potential and challenges of ChatGPT in various domains of healthcare. Ethical concerns, such as data privacy and bias, were also analyzed. Various fields of health were evaluated with ChatGPT, including nuclear medicine, gynecology, nuclear medicine, and emergency medicine. ChatGPT was considered a tool to improve patient education. ChatGPT has a promising role in scientific writing, emphasizing the need for human involvement, ethical guidelines, and addressing concerns related to bias, fabrication, and plagiarism.\nConclusions: Scopus-retrieved articles underscored the potential advantages and ethical dilemmas associated with the integration of ChatGPT in healthcare. While ChatGPT demonstrated promising applications in various medical domains, caution, further evaluation, and ethical considerations are needed for responsible implementation in real-world clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":44930,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of General Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/14354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ChatGPT, an artificial inteeligence-powered chatbot, presents a potential influence on healthcare and research in medicine. In this investigation, we systematically reviewed medical literature regarding the utilization of ChatGPT, utilizing the Scopus database. Methods: This systematic review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and according to the search in Scopus, 11,219 articles were identified. Original studies, clinical trials, correspondence articles, letters, notes, and research protocols were included, resulting in 14 studies. Results: All studies were published in 2023, among them 35.7% (5/14) were editorials and 14.3% (2/14) were opinion or perspective articles. Only one study (19) conducted a pilot study on the application of ChatGPT in medical diagnosis. Furthermore, 64.3% of the studies were published in quartile 1 journals according to Scimago rankings, and the USA had the highest production of articles on ChatGPT in medicine (35.7%). The included studies highlighted the potential and challenges of ChatGPT in various domains of healthcare. Ethical concerns, such as data privacy and bias, were also analyzed. Various fields of health were evaluated with ChatGPT, including nuclear medicine, gynecology, nuclear medicine, and emergency medicine. ChatGPT was considered a tool to improve patient education. ChatGPT has a promising role in scientific writing, emphasizing the need for human involvement, ethical guidelines, and addressing concerns related to bias, fabrication, and plagiarism. Conclusions: Scopus-retrieved articles underscored the potential advantages and ethical dilemmas associated with the integration of ChatGPT in healthcare. While ChatGPT demonstrated promising applications in various medical domains, caution, further evaluation, and ethical considerations are needed for responsible implementation in real-world clinical settings.
几个月后,OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 在医学领域有哪些用途?基于 Scopus 的系统综述
简介Acute ChatGPT 是一种人工智能驱动的聊天机器人,对医疗保健和医学研究具有潜在影响。在这项调查中,我们利用 Scopus 数据库系统回顾了有关使用 ChatGPT 的医学文献:本系统综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,根据 Scopus 的搜索结果,共识别出 11219 篇文章。原始研究、临床试验、通讯文章、信件、笔记和研究方案均被纳入其中,最终得出 14 项研究结果:所有研究均发表于 2023 年,其中 35.7%(5/14)为社论,14.3%(2/14)为观点或视角文章。只有一项研究(19)对 ChatGPT 在医疗诊断中的应用进行了试点研究。此外,根据Scimago排名,64.3%的研究发表在第一四分位数的期刊上,而美国的ChatGPT医学文章产量最高(35.7%)。收录的研究强调了 ChatGPT 在医疗保健各个领域的潜力和挑战。此外,还对数据隐私和偏见等伦理问题进行了分析。使用 ChatGPT 对各个医疗领域进行了评估,包括核医学、妇科、核医学和急诊医学。ChatGPT 被认为是一种改善患者教育的工具。ChatGPT 在科学写作中大有可为,它强调了人类参与的必要性、道德准则,并解决了与偏见、捏造和剽窃有关的问题:Scopus 检索到的文章强调了将 ChatGPT 整合到医疗保健中的潜在优势和伦理困境。虽然 ChatGPT 在各个医疗领域的应用前景广阔,但要在真实的临床环境中负责任地实施,还需要谨慎、进一步评估和伦理方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of General Medicine
Electronic Journal of General Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
79
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信