Why we need to decolonize the biosciences curriculum

Lovleen Tina Joshi, Catherine Mansfield, Isaiah J. Ting, Katharine Hubbard
{"title":"Why we need to decolonize the biosciences curriculum","authors":"Lovleen Tina Joshi, Catherine Mansfield, Isaiah J. Ting, Katharine Hubbard","doi":"10.1042/bio_2024_102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bioscience has a history linked to exploitation, colonialism and marginalization. Biology has been dominated by white European perspectives, and pseudoscientific ‘biological’ arguments have been used to justify discrimination and oppression, particularly on the basis of disability and ethnicity. Addressing this legacy within bioscience education is challenging, particularly as many bioscientists are unaware of this history and its on-going influence on the discipline. In this article, we explore what decolonization of the curriculum means within the context of bioscience. To demystify terminology for those new to the subject, we first consider the differences between diversification and decolonization. We then explore the historical connections between colonial activity and bioscience, including scientific racism, bioprospecting and eugenics. Additionally, we highlight where white western biases are still present in bioscience, from the dominance of European samples in genomic studies to the lack of Black and Asian academics in UK bioscience. Multiple barriers to decolonization are also considered, from individual lack of knowledge to structural and societal issues. We call on bioscience educators to actively decolonize their curricula, ensuring the discipline is presented in its appropriate historical and cultural context and is inclusive for all.","PeriodicalId":510527,"journal":{"name":"The Biochemist","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Biochemist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1042/bio_2024_102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bioscience has a history linked to exploitation, colonialism and marginalization. Biology has been dominated by white European perspectives, and pseudoscientific ‘biological’ arguments have been used to justify discrimination and oppression, particularly on the basis of disability and ethnicity. Addressing this legacy within bioscience education is challenging, particularly as many bioscientists are unaware of this history and its on-going influence on the discipline. In this article, we explore what decolonization of the curriculum means within the context of bioscience. To demystify terminology for those new to the subject, we first consider the differences between diversification and decolonization. We then explore the historical connections between colonial activity and bioscience, including scientific racism, bioprospecting and eugenics. Additionally, we highlight where white western biases are still present in bioscience, from the dominance of European samples in genomic studies to the lack of Black and Asian academics in UK bioscience. Multiple barriers to decolonization are also considered, from individual lack of knowledge to structural and societal issues. We call on bioscience educators to actively decolonize their curricula, ensuring the discipline is presented in its appropriate historical and cultural context and is inclusive for all.
为什么我们需要使生物科学课程非殖民化?
生物科学的历史与剥削、殖民主义和边缘化有关。生物学一直由欧洲白人主导,伪科学的 "生物学 "论点被用来为歧视和压迫,特别是基于残疾和种族的歧视和压迫辩护。在生物科学教育中解决这一遗留问题具有挑战性,尤其是许多生物科学家并不知道这段历史及其对该学科的持续影响。在本文中,我们将探讨课程非殖民化在生物科学领域的意义。为了让初涉该学科的人了解术语的含义,我们首先考虑了多样化和非殖民化之间的区别。然后,我们探讨殖民活动与生物科学之间的历史联系,包括科学种族主义、生物勘探和优生学。此外,我们还强调了西方白人偏见在生物科学中依然存在的地方,从基因组研究中欧洲样本的主导地位到英国生物科学中黑人和亚裔学者的缺乏。我们还考虑了非殖民化的多重障碍,从个人缺乏知识到结构和社会问题。我们呼吁生物科学教育工作者积极实现其课程的非殖民化,确保该学科在适当的历史和文化背景下呈现,并对所有人具有包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书